Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “United States v. VESSELLA”
Peter J. Vessella v. United Statespublic domain
BUTZNER, Circuit Judge: Peter J. Vessella, a marine electrician employed by Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation, appeals a judgment of the district court denying his claim against the United States, owner of the U.S.S. LUZERNE COUNTY, for injuries sustained while performing work on board the ship. Vessella based his claim on the unseaworthiness of the ship, and, alter
Vessella v. Dept. of Airforcepublic domain
USCA1 Opinion June 28, 1993 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ___________________ No. 92-2195 STEPHEN J. VESSELLA,
Randolph Wolfson v. Colleen Concannonpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RANDOLPH WOLFSON, No. 11-17634 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:08-cv-08064- FJM COLLEEN CONCANNON, in her official capacity as member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial ORDER Conduct; LOUIS FRANK DOMINGUEZ, in his official c
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ARIZONA ATTORNEYS FOR No.22-16729 CRIMINAL JUSTICE; CHRISTOPHER BAIRD DUPONT; D.C. No. RICH ROBERTSON; RICHARD L. 2:17-cv-01422- LOUGEE; RICHARD D. RANDALL; SPL JEFFREY A. KIRCHLER; JOHN CANBY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. KRISTEN K. MAYES, in her officia
Glunk v. Noonepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Savage, District Judge. Richard P. Glunk, acting pro se, brings this § 1983 action alleging all defendants *457deprived him of his substantive and procedural due process rights in connection with the suspension of his medical license which resulted in the loss of his hospital staff privileges. He also asserts
Glunk v. Pennsylvania State Board of Medicinepublic domain
OPINION * PER CURIAM Richard P. Glunk, M.D., appeals from orders of the District Court dismissing his second amended complaint. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm. Dr. Glunk, a Board-certified plastic surgeon, was a defendant in a medical malpractice case filed by the parents of 18 year-old Amy Fledderman, who died following liposuction performed b
Randolph Wolfson v. Colleen Concannonpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RANDOLPH WOLFSON, No. 11-17634 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:08-cv-08064- FJM COLLEEN CONCANNON; LOUIS FRANK DOMINGUEZ; PETER J. ECKERSTROM; GEORGE H. FOSTER; OPINION GUSTAVO ARAGON, JR.; ROGER BARTON; S’ LEE HINSHA
Randolph Wolfson v. Colleen Concannonpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RANDOLPH WOLFSON, No. 11-17634 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:08-cv-08064- FJM COLLEEN CONCANNON, in her official capacity as member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial OPINION Conduct; LOUIS FRANK DOMINGUEZ, in his official
Board of Professional Responsibility v. Moriaritypublic domain
ORDER OF PUBLIC CENSURE [T1] This matter came before the Court upon a "Report and Recommendation for Public Censure," filed herein January 14, 2015, by the Board of Professional Responsibility for the Wyoming State Bar. The Court, after a careful review of the Board of Professional Responsibility's Report and Recommendation, and the file, finds that the Report and Recommendation should be approved, confirmed, and adopted by the Court, a
In Re Abramspublic domain
257 P.3d 167 (2011) In the Matter of Honorable Theodore ABRAMS Tucson Municipal Court Pima County, State of Arizona, Respondent. No. JC-11-0001. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. August 4, 2011. *168 Osborn Maledon PA by Mark I. Harrison, Mark P. Hummels, Phoenix, Attorneys for Theodore C. Abrams. Commission on Judicial Conduct b
Moore v. Ashland Oil & Refining Co.public domain
CHRISTIE, District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action for damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the unseaworthiness of defendant’s vessel. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship and an amount in controversy in excess of $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs. The case is presently before the Court upon motion of the defendant for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civi
Mildred A. Pickney, Personal Representative of Joe Pickney, Deceased v. Oro Dam Constructors, Etc.public domain
FREY, District Judge: Appellants are here complaining of the judgment of the trial court dismissing the complaint following a preliminary hearing pursuant to Rule 12(d), Rules of Civil Procedure. The trial court dismissed on finding lack of jurisdiction of the Federal District Court. Appellants, plaintiffs be
Corrao v. M/V ACT IIIpublic domain
359 F.Supp. 1160 (1973) Salvatore CORRAO v. M/V ACT III, her engines, etc., and Adrian Allard, her owner v. HANSEN CHRIS CRAFT SALES, INC. Civ. No. 72-1850. United States District Court, S. D. Florida. June 4, 1973. *1161 *1162 Walter C. Lehmann, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs. R.
National Labor Relations Board v. Brownpublic domain
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, after a hearing before a Trial Examiner, found that respondent employers and’ respondent Brown Employees Association were guilty of unfair labor practices in violation of Section 8 of the-National Labor Relations Act (29 U. S.C. § 158), hereafter referred to as the-Act. Respondents were ordered to cease- and desist from such practices and in addition to take certain
National Labor Relations Board v. Rubin Brownpublic domain
310 F.2d 539 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.Rubin BROWN, an Individual, d/b/a Ace Wholesale Electrical Supply Co.; Brown Wholesale Electrical Co.; Excel Electrical Supply Co.; and Brown Employees Association, Respondents. No. 17757. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. November 14, 1962. Stu