Cases

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Carmelo Rodriguez-Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Vasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT SUSAN ILLSTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On October 18, 2013, the Court heard argument on a motion to dismiss the indictment brought by defendant Carlos Roberto Rodriguez-Vasquez. The defendant seeks to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that his prior deportation violated due process, and therefore cannot serve as a predicate deportation in this case. H

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Rodriguez-Vasquez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 127-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii), and possession with intent to *136distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetam

MEMORANDUM ** Eduardo Rodriguez-Vazquez appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawfully entering the United States after having been previously deported in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Rodriguez-Vazquez’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his sentencing enhancement based on a prior felony conviction remains foreclosed after United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 12

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

978 F.2d 867 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Luis VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-2341, 91-2821. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Nov. 19, 1992. 1 Roland E. Dahlin, II, Federal Public Defender, David B. Gerger, Thomas S. Berg,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JONNY SAVIER VASQUEZ- No. 19-71445 RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, Agency No. A098-489-762 v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney ORDER General, Respondent. Filed February 10, 2022 Before: Eric D.

543 U.S. 878 BELTRAN-RODRIGUEZv.UNITED STATES.MENDEZ-MARTINEZv.UNITED STATES.VASQUEZ-CIDv.UNITED STATES. andVILLASENOR-PEREZv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-5013. Supreme Court of United States. October 4, 2004. 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

LITTLE, District Judge: Relying on a double jeopardy defense, Jose Luis Vasquez-Rodriguez asks this court to reverse his conviction for conspiracy to possess, with intent to distribute, more than five kilograms of cocaine. Finding the appellant’s challenge baseless, we affirm the conviction. BACKGROUND

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 10, 2013 NO. 03-12-00580-CV Francisco Ivarra, Rebecca Lugo, Juan Villareal, Neal Zabicki, Anahli Vasquez, Willie Galvan, Helen Galvan, and Lee Rivas, Appellants v. American GI Forum of the United States, Inc.; Gilberto Rodriguez; Antonio G. Morales

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00580-CV Francisco Ivarra, Rebecca Lugo, Juan Villareal, Neal Zabicki, Anahli Vasquez, Willie Galvan, Helen Galvan, and Lee Rivas, Appellants v. American GI Forum of the United States, Inc.; Gilberto Rodriguez; Antonio G. Morales and Paul Herrera, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

SUMMARY ORDER Co-defendants-appellants Manuel Geral-do, Hargelis Vargas, and Jugo Cespedes (collectively, “defendants”) appeal from sentences and final judgments of conviction entered on October 30, 2015, November 25, 2015, and December 3, 2015, respectively, each by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Engelmayer, J.). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: Defendant-Appellant Raul Reyes pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113. The district court sentenced Reyes as a “career offender” under United States Sentencing Guideline (“U.S.S.G.” or “Guidelines”) § 4Bl.l(a). In doing so, however, the district court adopted inconsistent findings in the Probation Department’s Presentence Report (“

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Angel Rodriguez-Vazquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rodriguez-Vazquez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

NUMBER 13-00-348-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI __________________________________________________________________ RAMIRO VASQUEZ RODRIGUEZ , Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee. _________