Cases

457 F.Supp. 307 (1978) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Richard THALMAN, Defendant. No. 78-Cr-29. United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin. September 5, 1978. *308 Joan F. Kessler, U. S. Atty. by Stephen E. Kravit, Asst. U. S. Atty., Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff. Herbert L. Usow and Timothy K. Tollaksen, Milw

OPINION AND ORDER REYNOLDS, District Judge. The defendant, James Michael Foran, is charged with willfully and knowingly refusing induction into the Armed Forces of the United States in violation of § 462, Title 50 App. of the United States Code. The principal question presented in this case is whether the defendant, an avowed atheist, should have been classified by his local draft board as a conscientio

Nelson, J. The complaint, in form, contains'two causes of action. In the first cause of action so called it is alleged in substance and in fact as follows: That the Badger Raincoat Company is a Wisconsin corporation; that A. D. Usow, Jacob Briskin, and Oscar Rozoff were and are the president-treasurer, vice-president, and secretary respectively of said company; that on March 1, 1929, the plaintiff and de

68 Wis.2d 321 (1975) 228 N. W. 2d 702 MARIUZZA, Appellant, v. KENOWER, Individually and as Special Administratrix, and others, Respondents. No. 388. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued April 7, 1975. Decided May 6, 1975. *325 For the appellant there was a brief by Herbert L. Usow, S. C.<

2018 WI 13 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP1567-D COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against George W. Curtis, Jr., Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. George W. Curtis, Jr.,

785 F.Supp. 1352 (1992) Sammie L. REED, Jr., and Danna L. Reed, Plaintiffs, v. Dr. Thomas FETHERSTON, Dr. Michael Fetherston, St. Michael's Hospital, Glendale Clinic, S.C., Primecare Health Plan of Wisconsin, and Wisconsin Patients' Compensation Fund, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91-C-822. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 13, 1992. Herbert L. Usow, Mil

SCHUDSON, J. {concurring in part; dissenting in part). I join the majority's opinion on all issues except one. I write separately to declare most emphatically that a lawyer who, during a trial, threatens to withdraw from representation if the client elects to exercise the constitutional right to testify, is a lawyer who has provided ineffective assistance of counsel. Con

116 B.R. 665 (1988) In re Thomas P. EHR, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 87-02974. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 27, 1988. *666 Daryl L. Diesing, Milwaukee, Wis., for debtor. Jack U. Shlimovitz, Milwaukee, Wis., trustee. Herbert L. Usow, Milwaukee, Wis., for Foster Pontiac, Inc. DECISION <

88 Wis.2d 740 (1979) 277 N.W.2d 787 CHUCK WAGON CATERING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RADUEGE, Defendant-Respondent. No. 76-449. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs February 28, 1979. Decided May 1, 1979. *744 For the appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Timo

41 Wis.2d 416 (1969) 164 N.W.2d 281 FAHRENKRUG and wife, Respondents, v. D. M. BUILDERS, INC., and another, Appellants. No. 103. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued January 7, 1969. Decided February 4, 1969. *417 For the appellants there was a brief by Usow, Teper & Weiss of Milw

443 F.Supp. 908 (1978) WALES HOME REMODELING CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. ALSIDE ALUMINUM CORP., a/k/a Alside, Inc., and Tri-State Home Improvement Company, Inc., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 75-C-682. United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin. January 30, 1978. *909 *910 Herbert L. Usow, Timothy K

DECISION AND ORDER REYNOLDS, Chief Judge. This is an action to enforce the personal guarantee of the defendant David C. *571Schaack for the payment of a certain corporate obligation more fully described below. This court’s jurisdiction is invoked upon the diverse citizenship of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the amount in controversy bei

85 Wis.2d 246 (1978) 270 N.W.2d 397 SHERMAN, and another, Appellants, v. HEISER, Respondent. No. 76-135. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs September 6, 1978. Decided October 3, 1978. *248 For the appellants the cause was submitted on the brief of Robert E. Sutton of Mi

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WARREN, District Judge. This is a civil action in which the plaintiff seeks recovery from the defendants for losses plaintiff allegedly sustained as a result of the dishonest conduct of some of its employees. Defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (St. Paul) issued a savings and loan blanket bond to the plaintiff to protect it against such losses. The plaintiff made a claim

DECISION Before FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge, REYNOLDS and GORDON, District Judges. MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge. Notwithstanding the plaintiff’s claim that he is a conscientious objector, his local selective service board ordered him to report for induction into the military service. In this civil action, the plaintiff challenges the constitutionality of § 460(b) (3) of Title 5

Hanley, J. The following issues are presented on this appeal: (1) How many causes of action are stated in the complaint ; and (2) Is this a proper case for summary judgment? The village contends on this appeal that its documentary evidence positively establishes that the plaintiff was not a party to contract “C.” Since the plaintiff’s claim was based on the contract, th

71 Wis.2d 504 (1976) 239 N.W.2d 9 DALTON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MEISTER and others, Defendants: AMERICAN CITY BANK & TRUST COMPANY, national association, Appellant. No. 593 (1974). Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Submitted January 7, 1976. Decided March 2, 1976. *507 For the appella

46 Wis.2d 172 (1970) 174 N.W.2d 528 POSNANSKI, Respondent, v. HOOD, Appellant. No. 79. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued February 5, 1970. Decided March 3, 1970. *174 For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Louis J. Mestre of Milwaukee. For the respondent th

446 F.Supp. 959 (1978) Dr. Milton MARGOLES, Plaintiff, v. WISCONSIN STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, Doctor F. A. Ross, Doctor Thomas E. Henney, Doctor Robert G. Zach, Doctor G. Stanley Custer, Doctor John J. Satory, Doctor David J. Twohig, Doctor H. G. Withrow, Doctor Benjamin Lawton, and Doctor Thomas W. Tormey, Jr., Individually and as members of the Wisconsin State Board of Medical Examiners, Leroy L. Dalton, Individually as counsel to the W

38 Wis.2d 589 (1968) D'AMATO, Respondent, v. FREEMAN PRINTING COMPANY and others, Appellants. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. February 29, 1968. April 9, 1968. *591 For the appellants there was a brief by Lowry, Hunter & Tikalsky, and oral argument by Richard N. Hunter and Thomas E. Anderson, all of Waukesha.