Cases

PER CURIAM: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

636 F.3d 190 (2011) In re: AMY UNKNOWN, Petitioner. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, *191 Doyle Randall Paroline, Defendant-Appellee, v. Amy Unknown, Movant-Appellant. Nos. 09-41238, 09-41254. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 22, 2011. *192 James R. Ma

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge, concurring: I agree with the en banc court’s holding that the constitutional rights asserted by 15-year-old Sergio Hernández and his family were not clearly established in 2010, when Agent Mesa fired his fatal shots across the international border. However, I am compelled to write separately in response to Judge Jones’s concurring opinion, which, in my view, sets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 04-128-18 (RMC) ) GEORGE WILSON, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________

2. At about 4:15 a.m. on December 3, 2015, Garcia was arrested at his home on drug dealing charges and placed in the back of a police car. See Redacted Superseding Indictment at 1-2, filed March 16, 2016 (Doc. 49)("Garcia Indictment"); Transcript of Motion Proceedings at 138:20-21 (held April 13, 2017)(Lerner), filed May 3, 2017 (Doc. 254)("April Tr."); Transcript of Motion Proceedings at May Tr. at 22:23-25 (held May 4, 2017)(Adams, Sainato), file

III. GARDNER'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY Gardner moves to exclude the defendants' joint expert, Dr. Moulton, under *1324Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, Gardner asserts that Dr. Moulton's opinions are not "the product of reliable principles and methods" because he did not examine Gardner befor

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge HILTON wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge MICHAEL joined. OPINION HILTON, District Judge: This case comes before the Court on plaintiff-appellant’s appeal of the district court’s order dismissing her case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and la

567 F.3d 348 (2009) AMERICAN BOAT COMPANY, INC.; Underwriters Insurance Company; Navigators Insurance Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNKNOWN SUNKEN BARGE; Unknown Owner of Unknown Sunken Barge; Unknown Tower of Unknown Sunken Barge, Defendants, United States of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-2166. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: February

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. The Appellants (“American Boat”) brought this action for negligence and the district court granted summary judgment. American Boat filed a Motion to Amend Judgment, or in the Alternative for Reconsideration, and the district court denied the motion. The time to appeal the denial expired without action by American Boat. American Boat then moved to reopen th

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GENE EDWARD SCOTT, II, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 24-3646 (UNA) )

[Cite as U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Unknown Heirs of Miller, 2021-Ohio-2344.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HARRISON COUNTY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ND., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNKNOWN HEIRS AND DEVISE

Per Curiam: Plaintiff Daniel McGowan appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Cogan, /.), entered on April 7, 2015, dismissing his complaint. As relevant here, McGowan asserted claims for violation of his First Amendment rights under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and for false imprisonment and negligenc

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. *965 In the third iteration of this unfortunate case of mistaken identity, Plaintiff Stuart Wright (" Wright ") appeals the district court's 1 grant of summary judgment to the Un

OPINION PETER G. SHERIDAN, District Judge. Before the Court are Motions for Summary Judgment brought by four groups of defendants referred to in this opinion as the Federal Defendants, the Camden City Defendants, the Camden County Defendants, and the Camden County Prosecutor’s Office Defendants (collectively, “Defendants”). This suit arises out of events that occurred primarily on the morning of January 8

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Larry and Linda Barnes appeal from the dismissal of their Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) suit. The district court dis *1137 missed the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), based on its finding that the Barneses

Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting. This Court has long recognized the grave "physiological, emotional, and mental" injuries suffered by victims of child pornography. New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747, 758, 102 S.Ct. 33

OPINION NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. Raising an issue of first impression in this circuit, this case requires that we determine whether the Attorney General’s consent is required before a private plaintiff may settle or otherwise dismiss an action under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(

492 F.3d 1158 (2007) John NASIOUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TWO UNKNOWN B.I.C.E. AGENTS, AT ARAPAHOE COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, George W. Bush, President of the United States; Tom Ridge, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security; Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney General; United States Department of Justice; Jeff Copp, Regional Director (Denver), United States Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcem

418 F.3d 910 AMERICAN BOAT COMPANY, INC.; Underwriters Insurance Company; Navigators Insurance Company, Plaintiffs—Appellants,v.UNKNOWN SUNKEN BARGE; Unknown Owner of Unknown Sunken Barge; Unknown Tower of Unknown Sunken Barge, Defendants,United States of America, Defendant—Appellee. No. 04-3388. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitt