Cases

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Motions of American Board of Trial Advocates and Houston Intellectual Property Law Association for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Motions of American Board of Trial Advocates and Houston Intellectual Property Law Association for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc. (Sharp) appeals from the judgment of the Court of International Trade upholding the classification by the United States Customs Service (Customs) of Sharp’s imported glass cells as “[ljiquid crystal devices not constituting articles provided for more specifically in other headings ... Other devices ... Other,” u

246 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2001) CRYSTAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,v.TRITECH MICROELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND TRITECH MICROELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD., DEFENDANTS-CROSS APPELLANTS, AND OPTI, INC., DEFENDANT. Nos. 99-1558,-1559, 00-1006 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Decided March 7, 2001

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER I Introduction Wallach, Judge: Plaintiff, Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc. (“Sharp”), challenges the classification of imported glass cells consisting of two pieces of processed glass with a layer of liquid crystal material injected between them (“display glass”) by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”). Customs classified the m

Slip Op. 24- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE NINESTAR CORPORATION, ZHUHAI NINESTAR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ZHUHAI PANTUM ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ZHUHAI APEX MICROELECTRONICS CO., LTD., GEEHY SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD., ZHUHAI G&G DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ZHUHAI SEINE PRINTING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and ZHUHAI NINESTAR MANAGEMENT CO., LTD., Plaintiffs, v.

Slip Op. 23- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE NINESTAR CORPORATION, ZHUHAI NINESTAR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ZHUHAI PANTUM ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ZHUHAI APEX MICROELECTRONICS CO., LTD., GEEHY SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD., ZHUHAI G&G DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ZHUHAI SEINE PRINTING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and ZHUHAI NINESTAR MANAGEMENT CO., LTD., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES

Slip Op. 24-24 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE NINESTAR CORPORATION, ZHUHAI NINESTAR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ZHUHAI PANTUM ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ZHUHAI APEX MICROELECTRONICS CO., LTD., GEEHY SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD., ZHUHAI G&G DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ZHUHAI SEINE PRINTING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and ZHUHAI NINESTAR MANAGEMENT CO., LTD., Plaintiffs, v.

Slip Op. 24-57 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE KENT DISPLAYS, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge v. Court No. 20-00156 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [ Granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Kent Displays, Inc.’s claim that its imported goods are entitled to exc

156 B.R. 327 (1993) In re BICOASTAL CORPORATION, d/b/a Simuflite, f/k/a The Singer Company, Debtor. BICOASTAL CORPORATION, d/b/a Simuflite, f/k/a The Singer Company, Plaintiff, v. SEMI-TECH MICROELECTRONICS (FAR EAST) LIMITED, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 89-8191-8P1, Adv. No. 90-709. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. June 18, 1993.

149 B.R. 212 (1992) In re BICOASTAL CORPORATION, d/b/a Simuflite, f/k/a the Singer Company, Debtor. BICOASTAL CORPORATION, d/b/a Simuflite, f/k/a the Singer Company, Plaintiff, v. SEMI-TECH MICROELECTRONICS (FAR EAST) LIMITED, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 89-8191-8P1, Adv. No. 90-709. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. November 16, 1992.

Slip Op. 25-46 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge v. Court No. 21-00215 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [Denying in part and granting in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Reco

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered June 3, 2013, which granted petitioner-respondent’s motion to confirm an arbitration award and denied respondent-appellant’s motion to vacate the award, in the total sum of $7,660,993.68, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from the underlying order, entered March 11, 2013, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

130 B.R. 597 (1991) In re BICOASTAL CORPORATION, d/b/a Simuflite, f/k/a the Singer Company, Debtor. BICOASTAL CORPORATION, d/b/a Simuflite, f/k/a the Singer Company, Plaintiff, v. SEMI-TECH MICROELECTRONICS (FAR EAST) LIMITED, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 89-8191-8P1, Adv. No. 90-709. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. August 8, 1991.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered June 3, 2013, which granted petitioner-respondent’s motion to confirm an arbitration award and denied respondent-appellant’s motion to vacate the award, in the total sum of $7,660,993.68, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from the underlying order, entered March 11, 2013, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Slip Op. 23-170 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE NUTRICIA NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge v. Court No. 16-00008 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION [Granting defendant’s cros

In the United States Court of Federal Claims SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, No. 17-cv-825 Defendant, Filed Under Seal: November 29, 2022 and Publication: December 7, 2022 1