⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. United Memorial Hosp”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 240; 205 L. Ed. 2d 149
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-11-25 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 553; 205 L. Ed. 2d 356
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011-03-09 · Published · cited 15× · 634 F.3d 962; 78 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1145; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 4606; 2011 WL 799778
*963 POSNER, Circuit Judge. On February 15, 2011, we issued an order to show cause why the appellants should not be sanctioned for filing an oversized brief without our permission. The appellants have responded and the sanctions proceeding is ripe for decision — as indeed is the appeal itself, which has b
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-02-11 · Published · cited 44× · 915 F.3d 1158
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Stephanie A. Strubbe, Carmen Trader, and Richard Christie sued Crawford County Memorial Hospital (CCMH) as relators in a qui tam action for violations of the False Claims Act. 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (a) . They also
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2022-01-25 · Published · cited 1× · 971 N.W.2d 155; 30 Neb. Ct. App. 520
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 02/01/2022 08:09 AM CST - 520 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 30 Nebraska Appellate Reports WEYERS v. COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSP. Cite as 30 Neb. App. 520 Velma Weyers and Gilb
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-01-13 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 867; 205 L. Ed. 2d 451
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Georgia dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 317 F. Supp. 3d 168
III. DISCUSSION The plaintiffs challenge the 2005 Final Rule on two grounds. First, the plaintiffs argue that the 2005 Final Rule is procedurally deficient under the APA and the Medicare Act because the Rule was not a logical outgrowth of the proposed rules, thereby depriving affected hospitals of fair notice and the ability to submit comments. Pls.' Mem. at 9-19.6 Second, the plaintiffs
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-01-27 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 964; 206 L. Ed. 2d 125
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District denied.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007-12-21 · Published · cited 0× · 46 A.D.3d 1380; 847 N.Y.S.2d 894
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Eugene M. Fahey, J), entered December 15, 2006 in an action for, inter alia, breach of contract. The order denied the motion of defendant United Memorial Medical Center, formerly known as St. Jerome Hospital and Genesee Memorial Hospital, also *1381known as Genesee Memorial Hospital Association, doing business as Genesee Mercy Health Care, and
California Supreme Court · 2017-01-19 · Published · cited 94× · 212 Cal. Rptr. 3d 361; 386 P.3d 1159; 2 Cal. 5th 330; 2017 Cal. LEXIS 80
Liu, J. *333 A jury returned a special verdict finding that Sharp Memorial Hospital (the Hospital) was negligent in its treatment of Eke Wokocha but that this negligence did not cause his quadriplegia. Shortly thereafter, Wokocha died. An autopsy revealed evidence that, according to Wokocha'
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-10-26 · Published · cited 13× · 216 F. Supp. 3d 110; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148197; 2016 WL 6267950
MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge With its enactment of the Medicare Act in 1965, Congress created a complex national system that insures healthcare services for the elderly and the disabled. The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) administers the Medicare program through the Centers for M
Supreme Court of the United States · 2016-10-17 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 336; 196 L. Ed. 2d 265; 85 U.S.L.W. 3175; 2016 WL 4367694; 2016 U.S. LEXIS 6348
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018-04-04 · Published · cited 25× · 887 F.3d 62
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. *66When hospitals treat Medicaid patients, the Medicaid payments received from the government often do not cover the full costs of care. In 1981, Congress authorized the payment of additional sums to lessen the burden on hospitals that treat a high number of indigent patients. Years later, concerned that this payment adju
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004-03-26 · Published · cited 173× · 362 F.3d 923; 64 Fed. R. Serv. 334; 58 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 173; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5724; 2004 WL 601652
MANION, concurring in part, dissenting in part. I agree with the court that HIPPA does not adopt state privilege law in a federal question suit brought in federal court, but rather Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence governs the evidentiary privileges applicable in such suits. Opinion at 925. I also agree that it is not for us to create a federal common law physician-pati
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-08-07 · Published · cited 1× · 866 F.3d 1072; 2017 WL 3379000; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14490
OPINION M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: In 2011, the Secretary of Health ánd Human Services (HHS) implicitly interpreted 42 U.S.C. § 1396(a)(30)(A) (§ 30(A)) to permit approval of a state Medicaid plan rate reduction where the Secretary had not considered evidence comparing beneficiaries’ access to medical services to that of t)ie general public. This appeal
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 210; 190 L. Ed. 2d 131; 83 U.S.L.W. 3189; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 5616
Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2000-04-17 · Published · cited 0× · 529 U.S. 1067; 120 S. Ct. 1672; 68 U.S.L.W. 3655; 146 L. Ed. 2d 482; 2000 U.S. LEXIS 2594
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016-02-04 · Published · cited 16× · 812 F.3d 257
RAKOFF, District Judge: Under the Medicare Act, a hospital’s classification as “rural” or “urban” may affect the amount of reimbursement that the hospital receives for providing medical services, as well as the hospital’s access to certain medical programs. But a hospital can reasonably be viewed as “rural” in some respects {e.g., it is situated in a rural area
Supreme Court of the United States · 2000-04-17 · Published · cited 0× · 529 U.S. 1067
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-02-22 · Published · cited 1× · 875 F.3d 505
LUCERO, J., dissenting. The “Indian right of occupancy of tribal lands, whether declared in a treaty or oth*526erwise created, has been stated to be sacred.” Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, 187 U.S. 553, 564, 23 S.Ct. 216, 47 L.Ed. 299 (1903). Our respect for this right stems, or should stem, from Tribes’ status as “separate sovereigns pre-existing the Constit