⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

3 opinions for “United States v. Tummins”

District Court, N.D. Florida · 2018-06-02 · Published · cited 0× · 313 F. Supp. 3d 1278
Robert L. Hinkle, United States District Judge This case presents a recurring question: is a person in custody for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602,
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932-12-16 · Published · cited 8× · 55 S.W.2d 287; 331 Mo. 793; 1932 Mo. LEXIS 678
This is an original proceeding in mandamus wherein relators seek to compel respondent as Judge of Division No. 2 of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, to proceed with a retrial of the case of Elizabeth Henry v. Blackmer Post Pipe Company. Our alternative writ was issued, to which respondents made return. Relator's petition reveals the following pertinent facts: On December 16, 1927, Elizabeth Henry, dependant of James Henry, deceased, filed with the Workmen's Co
Pitner v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897-03-03 · Published · cited 8× · 39 S.W. 662; 37 Tex. Crim. 268; 1897 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 87
Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law in a subdivision of said county, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25 and twenty days' imprisonment in the county jail; hence this appeal. While the court ought to have quashed the second count in the indictment, yet the failure to do so was not error. The first count was good as charging a sale, and the conviction will be referred *Page 273 to that count. Appellant also excepted to the ind