Cases

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of the position asserted by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed on February 20, 2014.

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. ' Certiorari denied.

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge, dissenting: With due respect, my colleagues’ conclusion that a single technical Rule 11 omission by the district court is not harmless error returns us to the law as it was nine *227years ago, before this court took Rule 11(h) seriously.1 Until the en banc decision in United States v. Johns

*847(Reported below: 8 Fed. Appx. 704); (15 Fed. Appx. 404); (8 Fed. Appx. 712); (8 Fed. Appx. 710); (7 Fed. Appx. 592); (8 Fed. Appx. 709); (8 Fed. Appx. 706); (8 Fed. Appx. 671); (7 Fed. Appx. 599); *848

544 U.S. 1014 DE LA CRUZ-GONZALEZv.UNITED STATESLOPEZ-CRUZv.UNITED STATESARAGUZ-RAMIREZv.UNITED STATESCANTU-RIOSv.UNITED STATESCASTILLO-BUSTAMANTE, AKA GARCIAv.UNITED STATESMENDOZA-SIFUENTESv.UNITED STATESTORRES-AVILAv.UNITED STATESHERNANDEZ-GONZALEZv.UNITED STATESVELA-SALINASv.UNITED STATESNIEVES-ALVAREZv.UNITED STATESRAMIREZ-SAN

Appellate Case: 22-3066 Document: 010110818889 Date Filed: 02/28/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 28, 2023

Case: 24-50213 Document: 82-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/23/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit _____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-50213 consolidated with FILED

Case: 21-40307 Document: 00516229184 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/08/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 8, 2022

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1959 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. EDWARD BROWN, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. George Z. Singal, U.S. District Judge] Be

Case: 21-50524 Document: 00516265056 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/04/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 4, 2022

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0093p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plai

116 F.3d 308 UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Appellee,v.Martin BRIONES-MATA, also known as Martin Brigones, alsoknown as Martin Brigida, also known as Juan Torres, alsoknown as Martin Brinoes, also known as Martin Briones, alsoknown as Juan Castillo, also known as Martin Mata Briones, Appellant. No. 96-3514. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit Sub

ROGER W. TITUS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Advocacy does not begin and end with a trial. Throughout all stages of litigation, attorneys must vigorously advocate for their clients in spite of busy schedules, personality conflicts, or unforeseen circumstances. In particular, attorneys advocating for criminal defendants who face tough odds at trial must tell their clients what they need to hear -not necessarily what they

Case: 18-60497 Document: 00515355768 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/23/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-60497 Marc

Case: 18-11149 Document: 00515243823 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 18-11149 Fifth Circuit FILED

STUART KYLE DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Martin Araiza-Jacobo was caught attempting to cross the United States border carrying two bags of hard candies impregnated with over 5.1 kilograms of methamphetamine. The central issue at Araiza-Jacobo's criminal trial was whether he knew what he was really carrying. The district court instructed the jury it could find Araiza-Jacobo had culpable knowledge if he had been "deliberately ignorant" of t

ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *707Before the Court is Defendant Antonio Armijo-Banda's ("Armijo-Banda") motion to dismiss the pending indictment. (Dkt. 18). Having considered the parties' briefs, the evidence, and the relevant law, the Court enters the following order. I. BACKGROUND