Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Manuel Torres-Martinez appeals from the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960(a)(1), (b)(2)(G), and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(vii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. T

PER CURIAM: * Jose Luis Torres-Martinez (Torres) pleaded guilty to count 1 of an indictment charging him with being found illegally in the United States after deportation. Torres was sentenced to a 30-month term of imprisonment and to a three-year period of supervised release. Torres has appealed his sentence. Torres’s guideline offense level was increased by eight levels because

594 F.2d 243 U. S.v.Torres-Martinez No. 78-1850 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 2/26/79 1 D.Ariz. AFFIRMED

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

HARTZ, Circuit Judge. The most important thing at sentencing is determining whether the defendant will be incarcerated and, if so, for how long. Other matters, such as restitution and conditions of supervised release, are, appropriately, of secondary concern. But they are not inconsequential and deserve focused attention. Readily avoidable errors regarding these “secondary” matters appear too frequently on our docket. Partic

C. A. 1st. Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 1st. Cir. Certiorari denied.

540 U.S. 935 MARTINEZ-TORRESv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-6045. Supreme Court of United States. October 6, 2003. 1 Appeal from the C. A. 1st Cir. 2 Certiorari denied.

ORDER OF THE EN BANC COURT On July 31, 1991, we issued an order directing the appellants to show cause why this court’s orders of August 20, 1990, vacating and remanding for a new trial but staying mandate, see United States v. Martinez-Torres, 912 F.2d 1552, 1556 (1st Cir.1990) (en banc), should not now be vacated in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Peretz v. United States, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2661, 115 L.Ed.2d 8

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge, with whom SELYA, Circuit Judge, joins (dissenting). I join completely in Judge Selya’s well-reasoned dissent, and write separately only to emphasize further the court’s erroneous reliance (as I see it) on the “futility” exception to the raise-or-waive rule. See ante at 1553-55. As Judge Selya asserts, “[ejven in circuits where courts of appeals had authorized

BEA, Circuit Judge. Today we decide a district court need not and may not take into account Hispanics who are ineligible for jury service to determine whether Hispanics are underrepresented on grand jury venires. To establish a prima facie violation of the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee that grand juries reflect a fair cross-section of the community, a defendant must prove in part

537 U.S. 901 GENAO, AKA MARTINEZ, AKA TORRES SANDRIA, AKA SANABRIAv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-5201. Supreme Court of United States. October 7, 2002. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.

944 F.2d 51 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Santos Jesus MARTINEZ-TORRES, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Luis Alfredo MARTINEZ-TORRES, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Epifanio MARTINEZ-TORRES, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 87-2006 to 87-2008. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit.

841 F.2d 1117 Martinez-Torresv.U.S. NO. 87-2311 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. JAN 08, 1988 1 Appeal From: S.D.N.Y. 2 AFFIRMED.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

912 F.2d 1552 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Santos Jesus MARTINEZ-TORRES, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Luis Alfredo MARTINEZ-TORRES, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Epifanio MARTINEZ-TORRES, a/k/a "Fanny," Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 87-2006 to 87-2008. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit.

556 F.Supp. 1255 (1983) UNITED STATES of America v. Jose MARTINEZ-TORRES, et al., Defendants. No. SSS 82 CR. 489 (CBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 11, 1983. *1256 John S. Martin, Jr., U.S. Atty. by James R. DeVita, Marc J. Gottridge, Asst. U.S. Attys., New York City, for U.S. Goldberger, Feldman,

556 F.Supp. 1275 (1983) UNITED STATES of America v. Jose MARTINEZ-TORRES, and Nancy Medina, Defendants. No. SSS 82 CR. 489 (CBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 19, 1983. *1276 John S. Martin, Jr., U.S. Atty. by James R. DeVita, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, for U.S. Howard L. Jacobs, New York City

556 F.Supp. 1236 (1982) UNITED STATES of America v. Jose MARTINEZ-TORRES, et al., Defendants. No. SSS 82 CR. 489 (CBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 5, 1982. *1237 *1238 *1239 John S. Martin, Jr., U.S. Atty. by James R. DeVita, Marc

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 12, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-00362-CR EX PARTE JORGE TORRES-MARTINEZ On Appeal from the County Court at Law Washington County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-204 MEMORANDUM OPINION In a single issue, appellant, Jorge To