⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Tilghman”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-02-20 · Published · cited 0× · 712 F. App'x 458
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Charles Robert Tilghman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Tilghman has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996-09-18 · Published · cited 1× · 44 M.J. 493; 1996 CAAF LEXIS 100; 1996 WL 726488
Opinion of the Court CRAWFORD, Judge: Contrary to his pleas,- appellant was convicted at RAF Bentwaters, England, of rape; assault and battery (2 specifications); aggravated assault; making a false claim; and adultery, in violation of Articles 120,128,132, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 920, 928, 932, and 934, respectively. The members sentenced appellant to a dishonorable
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998-02-03 · Published · cited 20× · 134 F.3d 414; 328 U.S. App. D.C. 258; 48 Fed. R. Serv. 1216; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1429; 1998 WL 36481
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL. TATEL, Circuit Judge: Convicted of lying in order to obtain disability benefits, appellant argues that the trial judge’s repeated questioning of him prejudiced the jury and denied him a fair trial. Because the judge’s questions could have telegraphed to the jury that he disbelieved appellant, and becaus
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985-04-30 · Published · cited 0× · 762 F.2d 138; 246 U.S. App. D.C. 44
762 F.2d 138 246 U.S.App.D.C. 44 U.S.v.Tilghman 84-5789 United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. 4/30/85 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976-08-16 · Published · cited 0× · 539 F.2d 707
539 F.2d 707 U. S.v.Tilghman No. 76-1140 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 8/16/76 1 E.D.Va. AFFIRMED
Tilghman v. Galleypublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-06-28 · Published · cited 0× · 536 U.S. 967
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Tilghman v. Galleypublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-06-28 · Published · cited 0× · 536 U.S. 967
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-12-01 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 718; 190 L. Ed. 2d 441; 83 U.S.L.W. 3327; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 8086; 2014 WL 4795192
Petition for writ of ■ certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 526 U.S. 1153
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-06-28 · Published · cited 0× · 536 U.S. 967; 153 L. Ed. 2d 851
536 U.S. 967 TILGHMANv.GALLEY, WARDEN, ET AL. No. 01-9974. Supreme Court of the United States. June 28, 2002. 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 26 Fed. Appx. 311.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2021-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0676-19 MICHAEL JOSEPH TILGHMAN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS HAYS COUNTY MCCLURE, J., filed a concurring opinion.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 526 U.S. 1153; 119 S. Ct. 2036
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Headley v. Tilghmanpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1995-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 516 U.S. 877; 116 S. Ct. 207
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2021-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0676-19 MICHAEL JOSEPH TILGHMAN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS HAYS COUNTY SLAUGHTER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in w
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2012-05-10 · Published · cited 20× · 470 B.R. 902
470 B.R. 902 (2012) In re Charles J. KANE, Debtor. Stewart Tilghman Fox & Bianchi, P.A., William C. Hearon, P.A., and Todd S. Stewart, P.A., Plaintiffs, v. Charles J. Kane, Defendant. In re Harley N. Kane, Debtor. Stewart Tilghman Fox & Bianchi, P.A., William C. Hearon, P.A., and Todd S. Stewart, P.A., Plaintiffs, v. Harley N. Kane, Defendant. Bankruptcy Nos. 09-15557-EPK, 09-15558-EPK. Adversary
Supreme Court of the United States · 1992-01-13 · Published · cited 0× · 502 U.S. 1029; 112 S. Ct. 8652
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2019-06-07 · Published · cited 0×
> Texas Judicial Branch Texas Judicial
Supreme Court of the United States · 1976-11-29 · Published · cited 0× · 429 U.S. 984; 97 S. Ct. 502
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020-07-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-581 Filed: 21 July 2020 Harnett County, No. 16 CVS 1155 STEPHEN V. JUDD, Plaintiff, v. TILGHMAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant. Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 8 February 2019 by Judge Vince Rozier in Harnett County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 8 January 2020. Ortiz & Schick, PLLC, by Heather E. Conno
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020-07-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-581 Filed: 21 July 2020 Harnett County, No. 16 CVS 1155 STEPHEN V. JUDD, Plaintiff, v. TILGHMAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant. Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 8 February 2019 by Judge Vince Rozier in Harnett County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 8 January 2020. Ortiz & Schick, PLLC, by Heather E. Conno