Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Wylie Lucas John Thurman appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 20-year supervised release term imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for abusive sexual contact, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153(a) and 2243(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Thurman contends that the district court erred by (i) failing to calculat

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, District Judge. The Government has made pretrial motions for the admissibility of certain recorded jailhouse telephone conversations and for the testimony of a confidential source. All of which is to be used against Defendants in this case. The Court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge who has produced a comprehensive seventy-four (74) page report and

625 F.3d 1053 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Dale Franklin THURMAN, Appellant. No. 09-3545. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 17, 2010. Filed: November 22, 2010. *1054 Aaron D. Hamrock, West Des Moines, IA, for appellant. Craig Payton Gaumer, AUSA, Des Moines, I

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Andrew Thurman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Andrew Thurman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

MEMORANDUM *** Charles Andrew Thurman appeals from a court order of restitution imposed after he pleaded guilty to failure to pay child support. Thurman argues the district court erred in (1) failing to deduct a pending lien from its award of restitution, and (2) refusing to order Nevada motor vehicle officials to reinstate his Nevada driver’s license. We conclude Thurman waived his rig

MEMORANDUM *** Charles Andrew Thurman appeals from a court order of restitution imposed after he pleaded guilty to failure to pay child support. Thurman argues the district court erred in (1) failing to deduct a pending lien from its award of restitution, and (2) refusing to order Nevada motor vehicle officials to reinstate his Nevada driver’s license. We conclude Thurman waived his rig

MEMORANDUM * Thurman appeals from his conviction and sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) for possessing a controlled substance with intent to distribute. We have jurisdiction over Thurman’s timely filed appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Giving due deference to the district court’s factual findings, see United States v. Morning, 64 F.3d 531, 532 (9th Cir.1995) (“

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-1253 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Dist

LOKEN, Chief Judge. A jury convicted Thurman Griffin, Sr., of assault with a deadly weapon in Indian country in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153. The district court 1 sentenced him to 54 months in prison. Griffin appeals, arguing that the prosecutor’s improper cross-examination and closing argument were so prejudicial as t

903 F.2d 829 U.S.v.Thurman*** NO. 89-7425 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. APR 26, 1990 1 Appeal From: S.D.Ala. 2 AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

914 F.2d 1500 U.S.v.Thurman*** NO. 90-8131 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. AUG 28, 1990 1 Appeal From: M.D.Ga. 2 AFFIRMED.

48 F.3d 1217NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Thurman Edward DORTCH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5759. United States Co

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2022 MSPB 21 Docket No. AT-0752-17-0162-I-1 Gary L. Thurman, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1598 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. BRIAN THURMAN, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for t

Ripple, Circuit Judge. Law enforcement executed a search warrant at Brian Thurman's residence after a cooperating informant purchased heroin inside. They discovered drug paraphernalia, two handguns, and a large amount of money. Mr. Thurman was arrested and later charged in a three-count superseding indictment with (1) maintaining a drug-involved premises, in violation of

OPINION GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: Thurman Reed, Jr. appeals his guilty plea conviction, arguing that the district court erred in denying his motions to suppress. United States v. Reed, 810 F.Supp. 1078 (DAlaska 1992). We agree that the district court erred in suggesting that the Fourth Amendment permits police officers, without a war

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

TACHA, Circuit Judge. Thurman Harlem Jones appeals his sentence on the ground that the district court erred in applying the career offender provision of the Sentencing Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. section 994(h). We affirm. I. On January 9, 1989, Jones pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. sect