Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. The State of Mississippi”
United States v. State of Mississippipublic domain
Case: 21-60772 Document: 00516902521 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/20/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED September 20, 2023
United States v. State of Mississippipublic domain
WIENER, Circuit Judge *153 Since 1970, the Simpson County School District ("the District") has been under a consent decree to monitor the District's efforts to desegregate its school system. Students attending District schools ("the Intervenors") intervened in the litigation in 1982, contending that the District had
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1415 Filed: December 3, 2024 ) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ) ISSAQUENA COUNTY, ) MISSISSIPPI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1415 Filed: June 9, 2022 ) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ) ISSAQUENA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )
State of Mississippi v. JXN Waterpublic domain
Case: 24-60309 Document: 95-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/10/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 24-60309 April 10, 2025 ____________
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: The Hickory Improvement Association (the “Association”) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to intervene in this school desegregation case. The Association is a racially-integrated group of parents and guardians of children affected by the Newton County, Mississippi School Board’s plan to reorganize the Newton County schools. The reorgani
Mississippi County, Missouri v. United Statespublic domain
Takings; Motion to Dismiss, RCFC 12(b)(6) OPINION CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint. See ECF No. 10. For the following reasons, the *773 court finds that plaintiffs amended complai
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Karlene Gilmore v. State of Mississippipublic domain
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: *783 Karlene Gilmore's lawsuit against the Installation Commander of Camp Shelby Joint Forces Training Center in Mississippi was dismissed and her remand motion denied based on the district court's conclusion that Colonel Michel, a member of the Mississippi Na
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Pitts v. Mississippipublic domain
Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JEFFREY CLYDE PITTS v. MISSISSIPPI ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 24–1159. Decided November 24, 2025 PER CURIAM. Ordinarily, the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause “guarantees the defendant a face-to-face meeting with wit- nesses appearing before the trier of fact.” C
PER CURIAM: This school desegregation case was orally argued in New Orleans on December 16, 1977. We remand for further proceedings. The case involves the desegregation of the elementary schools of the Laurel Municipal School District, Laurel, Mississippi. The most recent order of the District Court discussed in detail the ra
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. United States Environmental Protection Agencypublic domain
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Per Curiam Plaintiffs filed these actions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma to challenge a regulation issued by the Environmental Protection Agency defining the term “waters of the United States” for purposes of the Clean Water Act. The district court dismissed both cases, concluding
Mississippi v. Tennesseepublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Jones v. Mississippipublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Jackson v. Mississippipublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.
State of Mississippi v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims ) STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Consolidated ) Nos. 19-231L/19-258L/19-1968L/ v. ) 19-1812L/20-30L/21-820L
Johnson v. Mississippipublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mississippi State Conference of the National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Barbourpublic domain
Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U. S. 333 (2011).