Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Susan H Kirkpatrick”
Susan Mellen v. Marcella Winnpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SUSAN MELLEN; JULIE CARROLL; No. 17-55116 JESSICA CURCIO; DONALD BESCH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-03006- v. GW-AJW MARCELLA WINN, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of C
State v. Kirkpatrickpublic domain
161 P.3d 990 (2007) STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Nathan Michael KIRKPATRICK, Petitioner. No. 77719-5. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued October 17, 2006. Decided July 12, 2007. *991 Dana M. Lind, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner. Carla Barbieri Carlstrom, Cather
United States v. Alcoa Inc.public domain
98 F.Supp.2d 1031 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ALCOA INC., Defendants. No. 4:99CV61AS. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. May 26, 2000. Clifford D. Johnson, United States Attorney's Office, South Bend, IN, Joseph Williams, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Regional Counsel, Chicago, IL, Lois J. S
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This is a qui tam action brought by Relator Edward West pursuant to the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33, and state law. Relator claims that Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical and its parent corporation, Johnson & Johnson, pursued a marketing strategy that gave kickbacks and unlawful remuner
People v. Kirkpatrickpublic domain
7 Cal.4th 988 (1994) 874 P.2d 248 30 Cal. Rptr.2d 818 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM KIRKPATRICK, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. S004642. Crim. No. 23921. Supreme Court of California. June 13, 1994. *998 COUNSEL Harvey R. Zall and Fern M. Laethem, State
EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co. v. United Statespublic domain
297 F.Supp.2d 740 (2003) E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Conoco Inc., and Sporting Goods Properties, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, United States Department of Commerce, United States Department of Defense, United States Department of the Army, United States Department of Energy, United States Department of the Interior, and United States Department of the Navy, Defendants. Civil Action No. 97-497 (WJM).
PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge. The issue in this case is how to measure the damages sustained by savings and loan institutions as a result of the breach by the *1376 United States of contracts it made with these organizations during the savings and loan crisis of the late 1970s and early 1980s. In
United States v. Daryle Sellerspublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-50061 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:12-cr-00722-TJH-3 DARYLE LAMONT SELLERS, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Centra
164 P.3d 500 (2007) FEATURE REALTY, INC. a Nevada corporation; Mission Springs, Inc., a Washington corporation, now d/b/a Canyon Construction Nw, Inc.; Jack Krystal, as trustee of the KM Family Trust; and Russell V. Lugli, individually and as co-trustee of the Lugli Family Trust, the Nikki Trust, and the Alpha Trust, Appellants, v. KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLIS, LLP; Jerry R. Neal and Jane Doe Neal, his wife, and the marital comm
United States v. Keystone Sanitation Co., Inc.public domain
885 F.Supp. 672 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. KEYSTONE SANITATION COMPANY, INC.; Kenneth F. Noel, Individually and f/d/b/a Keystone Sanitation Company; Anna M. Noel, Individually and f/d/b/a Keystone Sanitation Company; Arcata Graphics Fairfield, Inc.; C & J Clark, America, Inc.; The Esab Group, Inc.; The Genlyte Group, Inc.; Hanover Bronze and Aluminum Foundry, Inc.; Kemper Industries, Inc.; R.H. Sheppard Company, Inc.; and
United States v. Keystone Sanitation Co., Inc.public domain
867 F.Supp. 275 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. KEYSTONE SANITATION COMPANY, INC.; Kenneth F. Noel, individually and f/d/b/a Keystone Sanitation Company; Anna M. Noel, individually and f/d/b/a Keystone Sanitation Company; Arcata Graphics Fairfield, Inc.; C & J Clark, America, Inc.; The Esab Group, Inc.; The Genlyte Group, Inc.; Hanover Bronze and Aluminum Foundry, Inc.; Kemper Industries, Inc.; R.H. Sheppard Company, Inc.; and
Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Crosspublic domain
415 F.3d 130375 U.S.P.Q.2d 1321 Edward H. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AWH CORPORATION, Hopeman Brothers, INC., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross Appellants. 03-1269, -1286 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT July 12, 2005, DecidedAs Amended July 14, 2005.Cert. denied by AWH Corp. v. Phillips, (Feb. 21, 2006)Appealed from Philli
United States ex rel. Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.public domain
ORDER RE: SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW SARIS, District Judge. In this qui tarn action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq. and *38state law,1 the government has submitted twelve documents for in camera review which it contends are protected by the deliberative proces
252 B.R. 8 (2000) In re Jared B. STAMELL Debtor. Jared B. Stamell, Plaintiff, v. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, LLP and Gerald A. Novack and W. Shaw McDermott, Trustees of the Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nominee Trust, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 196-10614-260. Adversary No. 197-1471-260. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York. August 17, 2000.
United States ex rel. Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. INTRODUCTION The United States brings this action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 and state law,1 seeking to recover losses to the Medicare and Medicaid programs caused by the reporting of allegedly excessive and fraudulent prices for certain drugs by defendant Abbott Laboratorie
United States v. Perrypublic domain
548 F.3d 688 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javarlo Lasha PERRY, also known as Earl Junior Hunter, also known as Derrick Lamar Brown, also known as David Harvey, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3732. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted October 15, 2008. Filed November 24, 2008.
United States v. Shukri Bakerpublic domain
KING, Circuit Judge: In this consolidated case, we address the appeals of five individuals and one corporate defendant convicted of conspiracy and substantive offenses for providing material aid and support to a designated terrorist organization. The terrorist organization at issue is Hamas, which in 1995 was named a Specially Designated Terrorist by Presidential Executive Order
Lail v. United States Governmentpublic domain
771 F.Supp.2d 49 (2011) Rodney LAIL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-0210 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 24, 2011. *51 Rodney Lail, Myrtle Beach, SC, pro se. Irene Santacroce, Myrtle Beach, SC, pro se. James B. Spencer, Columb
United States v. Mubayyidpublic domain
476 F.Supp.2d 46 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Muhamed MUBAYYID and Emadeddin Z. Muntasser, Defendants. Criminal No. 05-40026-FDS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 8, 2007. *47 Michael C. Andrews, Law Offices of Michael C. Andrews, Boston, MA, Elizabeth A. Lunt, Malick W. Ghachem, Norman S. Zalkind, Susa
Jonathan H. v. Souderton Area School Districtpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT HARD IMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents a question of first impression concerning the timing of a compulsory counterclaim under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, as amended by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (collectively, IDEA). The District Court held that the Souderton Schoo