Cases

ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class *376Representatives. (Doc. 54). Also before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Appoint Class Counsel. (Doc. 56). For the reasons discussed below, the Motions will be granted. BACKGROUND On

656 F.Supp.2d 1106 (2009) SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. CV-08-1005-PHX-ROS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. September 3, 2009. *1107 Ronda R. Fisk, Geoffrey M.T. Sturr, Osborn Maledon PA, Phoenix, AZ, A. Stephens Clay, Craig Edward Ber

133 U.S. 541 (1890) STURR v. BECK. No. 1172. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted December 9, 1889. Decided March 3, 1890. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF DAKOTA. *545 Mr. Daniel McLaughlin and Mr. William R. Steele for appellant. Mr. R.A. Burton for appellee.

237 F.2d 135 56-2 USTC P 9954 Joseph A. BRUST, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of GeorgeSokoloff, individually, and doing business asConcourse Music Company, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Walter R. STURR, Collector of Internal Revenue for the 14thDistrict of New York, Defendant-Appellant. No. 374, Docket 23920. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

128 F.Supp. 188 (1955) Joseph A. BRUST, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of George Sokoloff, individually, and doing business as Concourse Music Company, Plaintiff, v. Walter R. STURR, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Fourteenth District of New York, Defendant. United States District Court, S. D. New York. February 8, 1955. Reich, Peller, Guadagno & Caine, New York City, for plaint

HINCKS, Circuit Judge. This is an action brought by a trustee in bankruptcy against the Collector of Internal Revenue to require him to pay *136over the surplus of moneys in his hands derived from a sale of distrained property of the bankrupt. The facts have been stipulated and are as follows: The bankrupt owed $39,627.75 in income, withholding, soc

52 Cal.2d 125 (1959) GEORGE B. T. STURR, Petitioner. v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. L. A. No. 25274. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. May 8, 1959. George B. T. Sturr, in pro. per., and George O. West for Petitioner. Garrett H. Elmore and Francis M. Wheat for Respondent. THE COURT. This is a proceeding to review the recommend

BOLDT, District Judge. By a contract with the United States dated June 19,1947 Radkovich Co. agreed to construct one hundred poured concrete houses for the Army Airfield at Muroc, California. The appellee insurance companies issued for Radkovich Co. a payment bond conditioned as required by the Miller Act, 49 Stat. 793, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a. By a subcontract dated July 30, 1947 Woolley contracted with Radkovich to perform the el

221 F.2d 264 Oscar K. DIAMOND and Helen J. Diamond, Plaintiffs,v.Walter R. STURR, Collector of Internal Revenue, Defendant.Charles BRUEN and Anna Bruen, Plaintiffs,v.Walter R. STURR, Collector of Internal Revenue, Defendant. No. 102. No. 103. Docket 23217-23218. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

PER CURIAM: This withholding tax case concerns the excludability of the fair market value of meals and lodging furnished by plaintiff Bob Jones University to many members of its faculty and staff. Trial Judge Bernhardt, after a trial, held for the Government. The case comes before us on the University’s exceptions to the trial judge’s opinion, findings, and result. Defendant supports the trial judge. Oral argument has been had an

• The .opinion of the court was delivered by Valentine, J.: The judgment of the court below in this case will be affirmed for the following, among other reasons, and upon the following, among other authorities: First: Error, is never presumed, but must always be affirmatively shown. (Hall v. Jenness, 6 Kas. 357; Winsor v. Cole, 10 K

Hill, P. J., (dissenting). This is a review under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act of decisions made by the Water Power and Control Commission of the State concerning the Wallkill Talley Drainage Improvement District located in Orange County, N. Y. It is a consolidation of many proceedings brought for the same purpose. An earlier assessment which was identical with this one wa.s annulled by this court (Matter of Stoltz

Mr. Justice Fortas delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents the question whether a federal tax lien, unrecorded as of the time of bankruptcy, is valid as against the trustee in bankruptcy. On June 3, 1960, a District Director of Internal Revenue assessed more than $14,000 in withholding taxes and interest against the Kurtz Roofing Company. Demand for payment was made, and the

Me. Justice Fobtas delivered the opinion of the court. This case presents the question whether a federal tax lien, unrecorded as of the time of bankruptcy, is valid as against the trustee in bankruptcy. On June 3, 1960, a District Director of Internal Revenue assessed more than $14,000 in withholding taxes and interest against, the Kurtz Roofing Company. Demand for payment was made, and the ta

JONES, Senior Judge. This is a suit by The United States Junior Chamber of Commerce to recover $747.89 as alleged erroneously assessed withholding and F.I.C.A. taxes, 1 together with interest thereon, for the years 1959 and 1960. The principal issue for our determination is

ROBERT P. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: On June 14, 1965, Warren and Virginia Horton and Charles and Mary Ann Musk were killed when the car in which they were riding exploded after being struck by a tractor-trailer truck, owned by HMH Motor Service, while traveling *762the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel in Virginia. The estate of Mrs. Horton is not involved in this litigatio

MEANEY, District Judge. These three actions were brought by the various plaintiffs to recover alleged excess amounts assessed against them for income taxes for the years 1951 and 1952. . The plaintiffs, J. Berkeley Gordon, Charles J. Audesirk and Margaret Rose McKeon, were employees of the State of New Jersey. Isabel Gordon joins as plaintiff with her husband, J. Berkeley Gordon, as they filed a joint ret

155 B.R. 44 (1993) In re FEDERATION OF PUERTO RICAN ORGANIZATIONS OF BROWNSVILLE, INC., Debtor. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. FEDERATION OF PUERTO RICAN ORGANIZATIONS OF BROWNSVILLE, INC.; Finkel, Goldstein, Berzow & Rosenbloom, Attorneys for the Creditors Committee, Defendants. No. CV 92-4807. United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 2, 1993.

139 F.Supp. 883 (1956) Lesile R. BEN, doing business as Ben Construction Company, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. No. 5528. United States District Court N. D. New York. January 9, 1956. I. Gerald Pliskin, Syracuse, N. Y., for plaintiff. Theodore F. Bowes, U. S. Atty., Syracuse, N. Y., H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Andrew D. Sharp

218 F.Supp. 240 (1963) The S. S. KRESGE COMPANY, a Michigan corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 21886. United States District Court E. D. Michigan, S. D. June 4, 1963. *241 Paul R. Trigg, Jr., Allan Neef, Dykema, Wheat, Spencer, Goodnow & Trigg, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff. Don