Cases

MEMORANDUM ** The district court did not err by denying Larry Stockett’s (“Stockett”) oral request to represent himself without prejudice and instructing him to consult with his newly-appointed counsel first. Stockett did not renew his request. On these *602facts, his request was not sufficiently unequivocal. See United States v. Kennedy, 5

MEMORANDUM ORDER BUMB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court upon the appeal by Plaintiff Theresa Pfis-ter Stockett (the “Plaintiff’) of the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying Plaintiffs application for social security benefits [Docket No. 1]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court VACATES the decision of the Administrative

ISHEE, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶1. In 2011, Frank Stockett was involved in a motor-vehicle accident with Roger Morris in Flowood, Mississippi. At the time of the accident, Morris was driving a company vehicle for Classic Manor Builders Inc. (Classic Manor). - Stockett *622 sustained

MEMORANDUM ** Larry A. Stockett appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for relief from summary judgment in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) civil enforcement action against *704Stockett. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, Delay v. Gordon, 475 F.3d 1039,

NO. 07-03-0284-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D MAY 25, 2005 ______________________________ STEVE OLDFIELD, AP

NO. 07-03-0284-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D MAY 25, 2005 ______________________________ STEVE OLDFIELD, APPELLANT

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 99-2692 Huston Stockett, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Muncie Indiana Transit System, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. No. 97 C 645--John P. Godich, Chief Magistrate. Argued May 15, 2000--Decided July 21, 2000 Before Cudahy, Flaum, and Evans, Circuit Judges. Flaum, Circuit Judge. Huston Stockett sued his employer, the

791 F.Supp. 1536 (1992) Michelle Ann STOCKETT, Plaintiff, v. Frank TOLIN, et al., Defendants. No. 88-1550-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 24, 1992. *1537 *1538 *1539 Karen Coolman Amlong, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., for plaintiff. Gr

NO. 07-03-0284-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D MAY 25, 2005 ______________________________ STEVE OLDFIELD, APPELLANT V. D

834 F.2d 1022 Giffordv.Stockett* NO. 87-4195 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. NOV 12, 1987 1 Appeal From: S.D.Miss. 2

20 Cal.Rptr.3d 176 (2004) 34 Cal.4th 441 99 P.3d 500 Jerry STOCKETT et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER AGENCIES JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY, Defendant and Appellant. Jerry Stockett et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Association of California Water Agencies Joint Powers Insurance Authority, Defendant and Respondent. No. S10

249 So.2d 388 (1971) STATE of Mississippi, etc. v. Robert N. STOCKETT et al. No. 45997. Supreme Court of Mississippi. May 17, 1971. Rehearing Denied June 28, 1971. A.F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Delos H. Burks, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Erwin C. Ward, Sp. Counsel, Jackson, for appellant. Taylor & Taylor, Bacon & Smith, Jackson, for appellee

(2008) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ETHYLENE CRENSHAW, ex rel., Plaintiffs, v. NANCY DEGAYNER, DEGAYNER ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT, INC., ELDIST MARIE LEWIS, CAROL BLACKMAN, KASS GENNEKEN, ROYAL PALM COURT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Defendants. Case No. 6:06-cv-1462-Orl-19KRS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. June 13, 2008. ORDER

191 F.Supp.2d 179 (2002) Shauna HELTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. Civ.A.01-0385(JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 21, 2002. Sean R. Day, College Park, MD, for plaintiffs. Kenneth Wainstein, Meredith Manning, Mark Nagle, United States Attorney's Office, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. The second appeal (plus the parallel proceeding for mandamus)1 *in a case filed by the Government in 1961 presents for determination the question whether the District Court, having found flagrant discrimination against Negroes in voter registration in Clarke County, Mississippi, has accorded effective, timely adequate relief. We hold in the negative and reverse with

380 U.S. 128 (1965) UNITED STATES v. MISSISSIPPI ET AL. No. 73. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 26, 1965. Decided March 8, 1965. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. *129 Solicitor General Cox argued the cause for the United States. With him

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 377 U. S. 988.) The motion of American Civil Liberties Union for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge: This proceeding for civil contempt for disobedience of the orders of this Court is an outgrowth of the Government’s suit for injunction forbidding racial discrimination by Respondent Theron C. Lynd, Registrar of Forrest County, in the Registration of Negro citizens, the appeal therein being this, day decided. United States v. Lynd, 5 Cir., 1965, 349 F.2d 785, Docket No. 22477.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 377 U. S. 988.) The motion of the appellees to strike portions of the brief and to strike the appendix to the brief of the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, is denied.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. Probable jurisdiction noted.