Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. State of Idaho”
United States v. State of Idahopublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35440 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35450 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO
United States v. State of Idahopublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 10 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 23-35440, 23-35450 Plaintiff-Appe
United States v. State of Idahopublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 28 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 23-35440
Butte County, Idaho v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims BUTTE COUNTY, IDAHO, Plaintiff, No. 19-cv-00800 v. Filed: January 19, 2021 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Steve L. Stephens, Stephens Law Office PLLC, Arco, Idaho, for Plaintiff. Daniel B. Volk, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. for Defendant. With him on the briefs are Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney
Idaho Stage LLC v. United Statespublic domain
Motion in Limine, Contract Interpretation; Request for Equitable Adjustment. ORDER HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT Before the court is defendant’s motion in limine seeking to bar plaintiff from presenting certain evidence or argument at trial. Plaintiff, Idaho Stage, LLC, (Idaho Stage) filed a complaint in the
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the court on Plaintiffs Idaho Rivers United, Washing*1255ton Wildlife Federation, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources, Sierra Club, Friend
Idaho Power Co. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge. This case concerns a contractual allocation of water for production of power from the upper Snake River in Idaho. In 1923, Idaho Power Company (“Idaho Power”) reached an agreement with the Bureau of Reclamation (“the agency”) concerning construction of the then-proposed American Falls Dam on land partially owned by Idaho Power and with respect to claimed water rights as to wh
Wolf v. Idaho Bd. of Corr.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Idaho Rivers United v. Hudsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge INTRODUCTION The Court has before it cross-motions for summary judgment and a motion1 to dissolve the injunction issued previously by the Court. The motions have been fully briefed and are at issue. For the reasons expressed below, the Court will (1) grant plaintiffs’ request for declaratory relief; (2) d
Shanahan v. Idahopublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Idaho denied.
Lynch v. Idahopublic domain
Petition for rehearing denied.
Sivak v. Idahopublic domain
Petition for rehearing denied.
Garza v. Idahopublic domain
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
Garza v. Idahopublic domain
Motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix granted.
Hall v. Idahopublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Idaho denied.
Little v. Reclaim Idahopublic domain
Today, by jumping ahead of the Court of Appeals, this Court once again forgets that it is " 'a court of review, not of first view,' " id., at ----, 137 S.Ct., at 1170, and undermines the public's expectation that i
Lynch v. Idahopublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Idaho denied.
Idaho Dep't of Corr. v. Edmopublic domain
Application for stay presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court denied. Justice Thomas and Justice Alito would grant the application.
Garza v. Idahopublic domain
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR delivered the opinion of the Court. *742 In Roe v. Flores-Ortega , 528 U.S. 470 ,
Edmo v. Idaho Dep't of Corr.public domain
iv. A strong desire to be of the other gender. v. A strong desire to be treated as the other gender. vi. A strong conviction that one has the typical feelings and reactions of the other gender. b. Second, the individual's condition must be associated with clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important a