Cases

Case: 14-11298 Date Filed: 02/12/2015 Page: 1 of 34 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-11298 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:12-cv-00179-M

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: In our nation’s recent history, active military personnel and their families have faced severe difficulties exercising their fundamental right to vote. For affected service members, the decision to serve their country was the very act that frequently deprived them of a voice in selecting its government. Congress responded to this real problem by passing the

WILSON, Circuit Judge: On June 9, 2011, Governor Robert Bentley signed into law House Bill 56, titled the “Beason-Hammon Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act” (H.B. 56). The stated purpose of the legislation is to discourage illegal immigration within the state and maximize enforcement of federal immigration laws through cooperation with federal authorities. S

HILL, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs claim that certain tax provisions of the Alabama Constitution violate the United States Constitution. They assert that these tax provisions so seriously underfund public education in Alabama that they have a segregative effect on Alabama’s colleges and universities. The district court denied the claim, and this appeal followed.

Slip Op. 25 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE HANON SYSTEMS ALABAMA CORP., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Joseph A. Laroski, Jr., Judge Defendant, Court No. 24-00013 and, ALUMINUM ASSOCIATION TRADE ENFORCEMENT WORKING GROUP AND ITS INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS, Defendant-Intervenors.

628 F.Supp. 1137 (1985) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, John F. Knight, Jr., et al., individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, Board of Trustees of Alabama State University and Alabama A & M University, Realigned Plaintiffs, v. The STATE OF ALABAMA; George C. Wallace, Governor of the State of Alabama; the Alabama State Board of Education; Wayne Teague, State Superintendent of Education; Aubu

OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. In this lawsuit, plaintiff United States of America named as defendants the State of Alabama and its Secretary of State and asserted claims based on the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act of 1986 (“UOCAVA”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff. The United States sought to enforce the right of military members, their families, and other United State

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-1480 C (E-Filed: March 26, 2018) ) ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(6); ) Collateral Estoppel; Covenant of Good v.

Justice SCALIA dissents.

OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. On February 24, 2012, plaintiff United States of America (“the United States”) filed this lawsuit against defendants State of Alabama and Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman (collectively “Alabama” or “the State”). Relying on the *1238Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act of 1986 (“UO

LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town ("AQTT") appeals several orders entered in favor of the United States, the Secretary and Associate Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior ("DOI"), the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and the Muscogee (Creek) Nation (the "Creek Nation"). Exercising jurisdiction under

434 F.Supp. 64 (1977) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, Charles A. Boswell, Commissioner of Alabama Department of Revenue, and Ralph P. Eagerton, Jr., Secretary of Alabama Department of Revenue, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 77-58-N. United States District Court, M. D. Alabama, N. D. July 13, 1977. *65 Ira DeMen

*1292 MEMORANDUM OPINION SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN, Chief Judge. I. SUMMARY On June 2, 2011, the Alabama Legislature approved House Bill 56 (H.B. 56), the “Beason-Hammon Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act,” Ala. Laws Act 2011-535, hereinafter H.B. 56. On June 9, 2011, Governor Robert Bentley signed

Plaintiff as Proper Party; Future Damages. ORDER Merow, Senior Judge This ease is the third round of litigation between the parties with regard to the government’s breach of its obligation to dispose of plaintiffs’ spent nuclear fuel. See Doc. 1 (filed Mar. 4, 2014); Alabama Power Co., et a

Spent Nuclear Fuel; Standard Contract Requirements; Breach of Contract Damages; Proof of Causation; Loading Costs; Equipment and Plant Modifications Costs; and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Fees. Merow, Senior Judge OPINION Plaintiffs Alabama Power Company (“Alabama Power”), Georgia Power Company (“Georgia Power”), and

630 F.Supp.2d 1320 (2008) State of ALABAMA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-0182-WS-C. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. November 24, 2008. *1322 Cheairs M. Porter, Office of the Attorney General, State of Alabama, Montgomery, AL, Kenneth S. Steely, Kirk

PER CURIAM: The Georgia Parties,1 Gwinnett County, Georgia, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps”) appeal from the Middle District of Florida’s grant of summary judgment in this consolidated suit. The appeal arises from more than 20 years of litigation involving the above parties as well as the States of Alabama and Florida, Alabama Power Company, the City of Apalachicola, Fl

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. This case is presently before the Court on Defendant Alabama Power Company’s (“Alabama Power”) Motion to Strike Paragraph 5 of Dr. Ranajit Sahu’s (“Sahu”) Declaration and Exclude This New Opinion From Evidence (Doc. 312). The United States filed a response (Doc. 331) to which Alabama Power replied (Doc. 335). A hearing on this matter

773 F.Supp.2d 1250 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Alabama Environmental Council, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. ALABAMA POWER COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:01-CV-152-VEH. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. March 14, 2011. *1251 Alice H. Martin, U.S. Attorney, Lloyd C. Peeples, III, U

JOHNSON, District Judge (specially concurring): The evidence in this case fully justifies and requires a declaration that the Alabama poll tax in its original purpose and effect and in its continued application and effect disfranchised and disfranchises Negroes in the exercise of their right to vote; the tax clearly violates the Fifteenth Amendment. I do, there