Cases

640 F.Supp.2d 983 (2009) Mary J. PATERNOSTER, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. 2:08-cv-388. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 22, 2009. *984 Timothy' S. Rankin, Craig J. Spadafore, Onda Labuhn Rankin & Boggs Co. LPA, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff. Bethany J

OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge. This action, filed by Francis Spadafore and his wife, Carol Spadafore, stems from an incident just outside their home in Detroit where gunshots were fired at Francis Spadafore by two Detroit police officers. The Spadafores sued a total of nine offi *851

220 S.E.2d 655 (1975) STATE of West Virginia v. John Richard SPADAFORE. No. 13503. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. December 16, 1975. *657 Paul E. Parker, Jr., Fairmont, for plaintiff in error. Chauncey H. Browning, Jr., Atty. Gen., Betty Caplan, Fredric J. George, Asst. Attys. Gen., Charleston, for defendant in

OPINION AND ORDER S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on three different motions to dismiss. We consider below Defendant the United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss Claims of Plaintiff JoAnn Snyder (doc. 11), Plaintiff JoAnn Snyder’s Memorandum in Opposition (doc. 20) and Defendant’s reply (doc. 21); Defendant Special Agent Chris Giordano’s Motion to Dismiss (doc

149 F.3d 1165 Mt. Airy Insurance Companyv.R. Charles Thomas, Bozic and Thomas, Thomas & Johnson,Thomas, Truax Spadafore & Walker, Thomas, Truax,Spadafore, Walker & Keenan, F. Gordon Watt NOS. 97-3137, 97-3138 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. March 13, 1998 1

535 F.2d 1257 Spadafore Equipment Co.v.Hill No. 75-2133 United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit 5/7/76 1 N.D.Ind. AFFIRMED

1. CRIMINAL LAW — THREE-TERM RULE — Under the provisions of Code, 62-3-21, as amended, the three unexcused regular terms of court that must pass before an accused can be discharged from further prosecution are regular terms occurring subsequent to the ending of the term at which the indictment was returned. The term at which *Page 675 the indictment was returned can not be counted as one of the three

[Cite as State v. Hicks, 2020-Ohio-548.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 18AP-883 v. : (C.P.C. No. 17CR-3130) William L. Hicks, Jr., : (REG

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED State of West Virginia, May 19, 2025 Plaintiff below, Respondent, released at 3:00 p.m.

Daniel S. Opperman, United States Bankruptcy Judge Plaintiff CMH Liquidating Trust ("the Trust") brings this Motion to Alter or Amend ("Motion to Amend") this Court's "Order Granting in Part, And Denying, In *927Part, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint" dated August 13, 2018 (ECF No. 278 ). For the reasons explained below, this

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED Lawyer Disciplinary Board, Petitioner November 13, 2024 released at 3:00 p.m. v.) No. 23-133

LOUGHRY, Justice: The State of West Virginia by petitioner, Mark A. Sorsaia, Prosecuting Attorney for Putnam County, invokes this Court’s original jurisdiction and seeks a writ of prohibition to prohibit the respondent, the Honorable Phillip M. Stowers, Judge of the Circuit Court of Putnam County, from, dismissing two misdemeanor charges against the respondent, Caleb Toparis. Th

128 Cal.Rptr.2d 342 (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 656 Paula R. ZINNEMANN, as Real Estate Commissioner, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Venancio A. BAGNOL et al., Defendants and Appellants; John J. Allison et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. A097383. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Five. December 19, 2002.

ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge. This is a § 1983 case in which the plaintiff, Joseph Michel, claims that defendants James Beutler, Putnam County, Ohio Sheriff and four Putnam County, Ohio, Deputy Sheriffs, Terry Dockery, Brian Siefker, Doug Engel, and George Moser, deprived the plaintiff of his civil rights to be free from unlawful seizure and prosecution. Pending is the defendants’ motion for

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS State of West Virginia, Plaintiff Below, Respondent FILED November 21, 2018 vs.) No. 17-0951 (Cabell County 15-F-337) EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK

GRINE, J, Presently before the court is a petition for modification of current custody order. Zachariah Marshall (Father) asks the court to allow his two sons, Ezekiel Marshall and Kaleb Marshall be allowed to remain with him in his home in Sterling, Virginia where they have lived since approximately August 2009. Penny Mason (Mother) asks the court to award her full custody of the boys so that they can return to Centre

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. 68) AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Kimberly Cox and Heather Claus initiated this putative class action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq„ alleging that Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich

OPINION OF THE COURT (August 13, 2013) Hodge, Chief Justice. Appellant Christopher Simmonds appeals from the Superior Court’s August 15, 2012 Judgment, which adjudicated him guilty of first-degree murder and various other offenses. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. I. STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE On June 29, 2010,

McFarland, Judge. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Stephen B. Johnson, appeals the decision of the Pickaway County Court of Common Pleas denying his Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in that (1) the amount owed on the cognovit note cannot be determined solely by reading the note, (2) the confession of judgment is invalid because it impermissibly involves a consumer transactio

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2023 Term FILED __________________ May 15, 2023 No. 21-0536 released at 3:00 p.m.