⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Soriano-Rojas”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 103 F.3d 114; 1996 WL 714051; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33828
103 F.3d 114 U.S.v.Gustavo O. Sanchez, Diogenes Rojas, Segundo I. Landazuri,Santiago Gil, Guillermo Soriano, Fermin Nunez NO. 96-7257 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Nov 21, 1996 Appeal From: D.V.I., No. 95-cr-00075 1 VACATED.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-09-10 · Published · cited 76× · 581 F.3d 994; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20165; 2009 WL 2883020
Opinion by Judge RICHARD C. TALLMAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by JUDGE MILAN D. SMITH, JR. TALLMAN, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Todd Johnson pled guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(a)(1). On appeal Johnson argues (1) that the district court improperly denied his motion to suppress and (2) that the district c
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014-03-26 · Published · cited 2× · 747 F.3d 164; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 5551; 2014 WL 1230001
OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Carlos Parra-Rojas was convicted of Bringing In or Harboring Aliens for Financial Gain, in violation of section 274(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Petitioner subsequently applied for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a). The Immigrati
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-09-10 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  No. 08-30094 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. 3:07-cr-00047-TMB TODD DOUGLAS JOHNSON, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States Distric
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-04-28 · Published · cited 0× · 132 F. App'x 116
MEMORANDUM * Defendant-Appellant John Devin Ring-gold appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized as the result of a search of his vehicle during a routine traffic stop. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. “[T]he scope of an investigative detention must be carefully tailored to its underlying justification, and may last no longer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 243 F. App'x 234
*235MEMORANDUM * Raul Elisio Yanez-Hernandez appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(ii). He challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized in a search conducted during a prolonged traffic stop. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-07-06 · Published · cited 0× · 234 F. App'x 752
MEMORANDUM * Bernardo Hernandez-Torres appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a prolonged traffic stop and from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(ii). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.1 Because the facts of this case a
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-01-28 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 02-3652 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003-04-23 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 02-2232 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Cory Baker Kamerud, * *
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-03-03 · Published · cited 15× · 356 F.3d 876; 2004 WL 135823
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Roman A. Rojas appeals from the judgment of conviction entered and the sen *878 tence imposed by the district court 1 on the jury’s finding of guilt on the numerous counts of distribution of cocaine, marijuana and me
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003-06-10 · Published · cited 40× · 326 F.3d 1008
*1012 BYE, Circuit Judge. A jury found Cory and Brett Kamerud guilty of conspiring to distribute and possessing with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), and 846. The jury
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015-04-03 · Published · cited 10× · 783 F.3d 30; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5399; 2015 WL 1501616
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Sometimes one ill-considered decision is all it takes. Unfortunately, this is so for our petitioner, Milena Dimova (“Dimova”). Dimova seeks review of a decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) finding her removable under the alien smuggling provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and ordering her removed to her native Bulgaria. Alt
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006-06-28 · Published · cited 114× · 453 F.3d 1331; 62 ERC (BNA) 1641; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16198; 2006 WL 1752139
PER CURIAM: The Center for Biological Diversity appeals the dismissal of its complaint as untimely under the six-year statute of limitations for suits against the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a). This appeal raises an issue of first impression for the Courts of Appeals: whether the failure of the Secretary of the Department of the Interior to perform t
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-02-23 · Published · cited 3× · 819 F.3d 98; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3159; 2016 WL 723298
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge. IT IS ORDERED that the opinion previously filed in this case, Le v. Lynch, 810 F.3d 314 (5th Cir.2016), is WITHDRAWN. The following opinion is substituted therefor: Petitioner Anh Le (“Le”) appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA” or the “Board”) decision to uphold an immigration judge’s finding that
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-01-11 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 13-60664 Document: 00513337232 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2016 REVISED January 11, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-01-06 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 13-60664 Document: 00513332687 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-60664 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ANH LE, Ja
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2003-06-19 · Published · cited 4× · 2003 UT App 203; 73 P.3d 967; 476 Utah Adv. Rep. 3; 2003 Utah App. LEXIS 59; 2003 WL 21402759
73 P.3d 967 (2003) 2003 UT App 203 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Tomas G. ROJAS-MARTINEZ, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20020706-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. June 19, 2003. *968 Hakeem Ishola, Ishola & Associates PC, Katy, Texas, for Appellant. Craig T. Peterson, Deputy Davis County
Rubio v. Statepublic domain
Nevada Supreme Court · 2008-10-30 · Published · cited 32× · 194 P.3d 1224; 124 Nev. 1032; 124 Nev. Adv. Rep. 87; 2008 Nev. LEXIS 103
194 P.3d 1224 (2008) Manuela RUBIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. No. 48459. Supreme Court of Nevada. October 30, 2008. *1225 Law Offices of Reza Athari and Seth L. Reszko, Las Vegas, for Appellant. Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General, Carson City; David J. Roger, District Attorney, Nancy A. Becker an
Utah Supreme Court · 2005-11-22 · Published · cited 4× · 2005 UT 86; 125 P.3d 930; 539 Utah Adv. Rep. 58; 2005 Utah LEXIS 133; 2005 WL 3110677
*931NEHRING, Justice: ¶ 1 This case presents the question of whether the court of appeals correctly determined that Mr. Rojas-Martinez’s defense counsel provided ineffective assistance by advising him, an undocumented foreign national, that he “might or might not” be deported if he pleaded guilty to a sexual battery charge, even though the offense was automatic cause for d