Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Soriano-Rojas”
103 F.3d 114 U.S.v.Gustavo O. Sanchez, Diogenes Rojas, Segundo I. Landazuri,Santiago Gil, Guillermo Soriano, Fermin Nunez NO. 96-7257 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Nov 21, 1996 Appeal From: D.V.I., No. 95-cr-00075 1 VACATED.
United States v. Johnsonpublic domain
Opinion by Judge RICHARD C. TALLMAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by JUDGE MILAN D. SMITH, JR. TALLMAN, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Todd Johnson pled guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(a)(1). On appeal Johnson argues (1) that the district court improperly denied his motion to suppress and (2) that the district c
Parra-Rojas v. Attorney General United Statespublic domain
OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Carlos Parra-Rojas was convicted of Bringing In or Harboring Aliens for Financial Gain, in violation of section 274(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Petitioner subsequently applied for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a). The Immigrati
United States v. Todd Johnsonpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA No. 08-30094 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. 3:07-cr-00047-TMB TODD DOUGLAS JOHNSON, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States Distric
United States v. Ringgoldpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Defendant-Appellant John Devin Ring-gold appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized as the result of a search of his vehicle during a routine traffic stop. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. “[T]he scope of an investigative detention must be carefully tailored to its underlying justification, and may last no longer
United States v. Yanez-Hernandezpublic domain
*235MEMORANDUM * Raul Elisio Yanez-Hernandez appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(ii). He challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized in a search conducted during a prolonged traffic stop. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
United States v. Hernandez-Torrespublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Bernardo Hernandez-Torres appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during a prolonged traffic stop and from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(ii). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.1 Because the facts of this case a
United States v. Roman Rojaspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 02-3652 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court
United States v. Cory Kamerudpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 02-2232 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Cory Baker Kamerud, * *
United States v. Roman A. Rojaspublic domain
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Roman A. Rojas appeals from the judgment of conviction entered and the sen *878 tence imposed by the district court 1 on the jury’s finding of guilt on the numerous counts of distribution of cocaine, marijuana and me
United States v. Cory Baker Kamerud, United States of America v. Brett Christian Kamerudpublic domain
*1012 BYE, Circuit Judge. A jury found Cory and Brett Kamerud guilty of conspiring to distribute and possessing with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), and 846. The jury
Dimova v. Holder, Jr.public domain
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Sometimes one ill-considered decision is all it takes. Unfortunately, this is so for our petitioner, Milena Dimova (“Dimova”). Dimova seeks review of a decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) finding her removable under the alien smuggling provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and ordering her removed to her native Bulgaria. Alt
Center for Biological Diversity v. Sam Hamiltonpublic domain
PER CURIAM: The Center for Biological Diversity appeals the dismissal of its complaint as untimely under the six-year statute of limitations for suits against the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a). This appeal raises an issue of first impression for the Courts of Appeals: whether the failure of the Secretary of the Department of the Interior to perform t
Anh Le v. Loretta Lynchpublic domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge. IT IS ORDERED that the opinion previously filed in this case, Le v. Lynch, 810 F.3d 314 (5th Cir.2016), is WITHDRAWN. The following opinion is substituted therefor: Petitioner Anh Le (“Le”) appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA” or the “Board”) decision to uphold an immigration judge’s finding that
Anh Le v. Loretta Lynchpublic domain
Case: 13-60664 Document: 00513337232 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2016 REVISED January 11, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
Anh Le v. Loretta Lynchpublic domain
Case: 13-60664 Document: 00513332687 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-60664 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ANH LE, Ja
Craig Lyons v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods Lpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I
State v. Rojas-Martinezpublic domain
73 P.3d 967 (2003) 2003 UT App 203 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Tomas G. ROJAS-MARTINEZ, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20020706-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. June 19, 2003. *968 Hakeem Ishola, Ishola & Associates PC, Katy, Texas, for Appellant. Craig T. Peterson, Deputy Davis County
Rubio v. Statepublic domain
194 P.3d 1224 (2008) Manuela RUBIO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. No. 48459. Supreme Court of Nevada. October 30, 2008. *1225 Law Offices of Reza Athari and Seth L. Reszko, Las Vegas, for Appellant. Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General, Carson City; David J. Roger, District Attorney, Nancy A. Becker an
State v. Rojas-Martinezpublic domain
*931NEHRING, Justice: ¶ 1 This case presents the question of whether the court of appeals correctly determined that Mr. Rojas-Martinez’s defense counsel provided ineffective assistance by advising him, an undocumented foreign national, that he “might or might not” be deported if he pleaded guilty to a sexual battery charge, even though the offense was automatic cause for d