Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Skelton”
United States v. Skeltonpublic domain
514 F.3d 433 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John C. SKELTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-51528. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 17, 2008. *434 *435 Mara A. Blatt (argued), Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, TX, for U.S. Dav
United States v. Skeltonpublic domain
ORDER Kerry Skelton appeals a district court sentence imposed after his conviction on charges of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. The parties have waived oral argument in this case. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
United States v. Skeltonpublic domain
ORDER Adam Uell Skelton, represented by-counsel, appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). In May 2002, Skelton pleaded guilty to wielding a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm in v
United States v. Skeltonpublic domain
ORDER Fred Skelton and Vickie Duckett pleaded guilty to drug offenses and now challenge their sentences on appeal. We affirm. On December 17, 1999, police received reports that Skelton and Duckett were using Duckett’s house as a methamphetamine lab. According to the reports, Skelton and Duckett provided another man, Jack Garrett, with supplies to manufacture methamphetamine. Garrett gave them a portion of the finishe
United States v. Skeltonpublic domain
888 F.2d 1383 U.S.v.Skelton (Robert Thomas), a/k/a Skelton (Tommy), a/k/aSkelton (Tommy Hayes), Tozzi (Donna), a/k/aSkelton (Donna E.), Tozzi (DeanAnthony), Frank (Alan), a/k/aRoy (A.), Koval (John A., Sr.) NO. 88-3570 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. OCT 12, 1989 Appeal From: W.D
United States v. Skeltonpublic domain
893 F.2d 40 The UNITED STATESv.Robert Thomas SKELTON a/k/a Tommy Skelton, a/k/a Tommy HayesSkelton, Donna Tozzi a/k/a Donna E. Skelton, DeanAnthony Tozzi, Alan Frank a/k/a A. Roy,John A. Koval, Sr.Appeal of UNITED STATES of America. No. 89-3456. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Dec. 12, 1989.Decided Jan. 8, 1990.Reheari
United States v. Skeltonpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. The United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731, appeals from an order of May 31, 1989, granting appellee, Donna C. Tozzi, a new trial following her conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 371, for conspiring to defraud the United States of income tax due and owing. The circumstances leading to this appeal are as follows. An indictment was returned i
United States v. Skelton (Richard L.)public domain
897 F.2d 531 U.S.v.Skelton (Richard L.) NO. 89-1081 United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. FEB 05, 1990 1 Appeal From: S.D.Ill. 2 AFFIRMED.
Skelton v. United States Supreme Courtpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James B. Skelton appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
United States v. Skeltonpublic domain
605 F.2d 557 U. S.v.Skelton No. 78-5409 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit 8/9/79 1 M.D.Tenn. AFFIRMED
Skelton v. United Statespublic domain
543 U.S. 1109 SKELTONv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-6299. Supreme Court of United States. January 24, 2005. 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 89; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases
Skelton v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Skelton v. United Statespublic domain
535 U.S. 1008 SKELTONv.UNITED STATES. No. 01-8963. Supreme Court of the United States. April 15, 2002. 1 C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 25 Fed. Appx. 443.
Skelton v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
ORDER Petitioner having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination it is ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED. Respondent should compute the due date for filing its brief of the date of filing of this order.
Skelton v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Skelton v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Skelton v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
ORDER Order vacated, see 2005 WL 1654882. The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, *839for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Skelton v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Skelton v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Skelton v. United Statespublic domain
48 F.3d 1225NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action. Art SKELTON, Appellant,Don Hecke; L. D. Macjunkin; Richard Phillips; MichaelCarboner; M.A. Abrie, Plaintiffs,v.UNITED STATES of America, doing business as Farmers HomeAdminis