Cases

922 F.2d 839 U.S.v.A Single Story Residence* NO. 90-2536 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. DEC 27, 1990 1 Appeal From: S.D.Tex. 2

727 F.Supp. 149 (1989) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. A SINGLE STORY DOUBLE WIDE TRAILER, gray in color with black bars on the windows, located at R.D. 4, Box 382E, Seaford, Delaware, Serial No. 100165ABX; etc., and Charles Peterson, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 89-127-JLL. United States District Court, D. Delaware. December 8, 1989.

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. Single Story House, 2012 IL App (5th) 110562 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Caption SINGLE STORY HOUSE et al., Defendants-Appellees. District & No. Fifth District Docket Nos. 5-11-0562, 5-11-0563 cons. Filed Octo

FILED May 19 2020, 5:53 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

771 F.Supp.2d 1234 (2011) Susan Annette STORY, Plaintiff, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Defendant. No. CV-09-5063-LRS. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. February 11, 2011. *1237 Ronald F. St. Hilaire, Liebler Ivey & Connor PS, Kennewick, WA, for Plaintiff. Rudolf J. Verschoor, United States Attorney's Office, Spoka

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Vermont Unit Docket No. 43-3-14 Vtec Kodis Second Story Addition Application DECISION ON MOTION Rebecca Kodis (“Applicant”) appeals the denial of her application for a permit to add a second story to her single-family dwelling at 14 High Street in the

OPINION AND ORDER MAURICE B. COHILL, JR., Senior District Judge. Plaintiff Pearlina Story (“Ms. Story”), a resident of Wilkinsburg, in the Western District of Pennsylvania, filed a Complaint against Defendant Republic First Bank (“Republic Bank”), a Pennsylvania chartered bank with its principal place of business in Philadelphia, wherein she claims that Republic Bank is liable to her based upon th

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Kendrick C. Story, an African-American inmate in Arkansas, sued four correctional officers pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that they violated his constitutional rights and seeking damages. Story’s pro se complaint and amended complaint focus on a visual body-cavity search that one or more officers allegedly conducted of Story’s person on April 16, 2013. The search occurred after Story returned

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

Case: 24-10126 Document: 84-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/02/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 24-10126 October 2, 2025

Appellate Case: 24-4058 Document: 48-1 Date Filed: 06/03/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 3, 2025

Appellate Case: 24-5068 Document: 69-1 Date Filed: 08/04/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH August 4, 2025

Appellate Case: 24-1119 Document: 70-1 Date Filed: 08/21/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2025

Appellate Case: 23-7087 Document: 71-1 Date Filed: 04/22/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 22, 2025

In the United States Court of Federal Claims JAY ANTHONY DOBYNS, Plaintiff, No. 08-700 v. Filed under seal: August 27, 2025 Reissued: September 11, 2025 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. James B. Reed, Udall Shumway PLC, Mesa, Arizona, for plaintiff. William J

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit