Cases

SUSZAN, Judge: On 20 December 2002, a military judge, sitting as a special court-martial, convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of unauthorized absence, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 886. The military judge sentenced the appellant to a bad-conduct discharge. On 13 May 2003, the convening authority (CA) approved the sentence as adjudged. We have careful

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Case below, 734 F.3d 1290.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: After a criminal jury trial, DefendanN Appellant Morgan Siler appeals his conviction and sentence for assaulting a corrections officer with a deadly or dangerous weapon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(b). After careful review, and with the benefit of oral argument, we affirm Siler’s conviction and sentence. I. BACKGROUND

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certio-­rari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied. Same case below, 416 Fed. Appx. 907.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See M

C. A. 11-th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Stoll, Circuit Judge. The Environmental Protection Agency removed Mr. Matthew Siler from his position *1294 following an administrative investigation. On appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Board sustained the agency's attorney-client privilege claim as to certain draft

153 F.3d 729 98 CJ C.A.R. 4193 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,

PER CURIAM. Jonathan M. Siler appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint alleging a violation under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Siler v. Katta, No. CA-03-100 (E.D.Va. N

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Ct. App. Ohio, Ashland County. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (2004).

538 U.S. 982 SILERv.VAVROSKY. No. 02-8966. Supreme Court of United States. April 21, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. 2 C. A. 9th Cir

399 Submitted October 19, 2020, affirmed February 18, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARY ELLEN INGRAM SILER, aka Mary Siler, Defendant-Appellant. Lincoln County Circuit Court 18CR42161; A169312 481 P3d 1030 Thomas O. Branford, Judge. Erne

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA 23-474 Filed 6 August 2024 Chatham County, Nos. 21 CRS 51035-51036 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS CLEMON SILER, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from two judgments entered 4 August 2022 by Judge R. Allen Baddour, Jr. in Chatham County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 2 May 2024. Attorn

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge. I concur, without qualification, in the accompanying per curiam opinion, but, because of certain disquieting aspects of the case, consider it proper to express a personal view with respect to the nature of the proofs, and the applicable law. Mr. Perry H. Siler, the owner of Siler Drug Company, Inc., appealed from a judgmen