Cases

PER CURIAM: William Shorter, Jr., seeks to appeal from the district court’s order dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion for which authorization had not been obtained. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

PER CURIAM. William Shorter, Jr. appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motions for sealed records and transcripts. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Shorter, No. CR-98-192-A (E.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2001; filed Oct. 11, 2001 & entered Oct. 15, 2001). We dispense with o

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 01-4942 EARL SHORTER, Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

PER CURIAM. William Shorter, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for stenographic notes and records relating to three of his co-conspirators: Lebby, *829Brown, and Roberts. He also appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s Aug. 27, 2001, order denying access to records. We have reviewed the record

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Appellant Frelimo Shorter was convicted of possessing a controlled substance with intent to deliver in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(c). The District Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and since Shorter is appealing a final judgment, we have jurisdiction

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 20-2554 ____________ CHRISTOPHER “CHRISSY” SHORTER, Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH, Warden; CHRISTINE DYNAN, Associate Warden; ROBERT HAZZLEWOOD, Associate Warden; DR. MARANTZ, Ch

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2091 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONTE SHORTER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

CONLEY, District Judge. In 2014, following investigations by the Indiana Attorney General and FBI, a grand jury issued a four-count indictment for Medicaid fraud against defendants Wanda Shorter and her company, Empowerment Non-Emergency Medical Transport, Inc. (“Empowerment”). Specifically, Shorter and Empowerment were charged with one count

MEMORANDUM ORDER HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge. Defendant, an attorney appearing pro se, was convicted after a twenty-one day trial of one count of tax evasion and six counts of willful failure to pay income taxes. By motion filed before the verdict was rendered on Count 1, defendant moved for a mistrial as to that count and to vacate the verdict on Counts 2 through 7, on the ground of prosecutor

618 F.Supp. 255 (1985) UNITED STATES of America v. John A. SHORTER, Jr. Crim. No. 84-0421. United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 13, 1985. *256 Carol E. Bruce, Darryl W. Jackson, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., for Government. Plato Cacheris, Larry S. Gondelman, Hundley & Cacheris, Washingt

608 F.Supp. 871 (1985) UNITED STATES of America v. John A. SHORTER, Jr. Crim. No. 84-00421. United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 26, 1985. *872 *873 Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., Carol E. Bruce, Darryl W. Jackson, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., for prosecution.

MEMORANDUM HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge. Defendant's motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33 for a new trial raises four matters, three of which have previously been addressed in writing by the Court.1 Defendant raises no new issues with respect to those three matters, and the Court will not disturb its prior rulings for the reasons given at length when those rulings were made.</

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Same case below, 356 Fed. Appx. 660.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

343 A.2d 569 (1975) UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Michael K. SHORTER, Appellee. No. 9076. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued July 17, 1975. Decided August 26, 1975. As Amended September 29, 1975. Rehearing en Banc Denied October 29, 1975. *570 Richard A. Graham, Asst. U

541 U.S. 1005 SHORTERv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-9479. Supreme Court of United States. April 19, 2004. 1 C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.