Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2048, 20-2049, 20-2080, 20-2086, 20-2087, 20-2088, 20-2100, 20-2115, 20-2116, 20-2117, 20-2133, 20-2208, 20-2229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENTREVION WATKINS, et al. Defendants-Appell

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Francis David Sherman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen the period to note an appeal from the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Sherman’s motion asserted that he did not receive a copy of the dis

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-2929 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Sherman Johnson, Jr. Defendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 18-3156 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee

'Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Sherman Mitchell (Mitchell) was convicted by jury of multiple counts of drug crimes resulting from his role in a .phency-clidine (PCP) distribution ring. Mitchell challenges his convictions on several grounds, including, inter alia, the. gove

Case: 13-70025 Document: 00512753302 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/02/2014 REVISED September 2, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 30, 2014

797 F.Supp.2d 709 (2011) United States of America v. Francis Davis SHERMAN, Defendant. Case No. 1:10CR00039. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division. July 15, 2011. *710 Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, VA, for United States. Christine Madeleine Lee, Research and Writing At

KING, Circuit Judge: Petitioner-Appellant Sherman Lamont Fields was convicted of murder in a- jury trial in federal district court and sentenced to death. We affirmed his conviction and *450 sentence on direct appeal. Fields unsuccessfully sought habeas relief in the district court on numerous groun

784 F.Supp.2d 618 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Francis David SHERMAN, Defendant. Case No. 1:10CR00039. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division. April 11, 2011. *619 Zachary T. Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, VA, for United States. Nancy Dickenson, Assistant Federal Public Defe

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Angelo Sherman appeals the district court’s summary order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b)(5) motion asking the district court to reconsider the length of his criminal sentence. Because the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not apply to Sherman’s criminal matter, and

PER CURIAM. Fontaine Demmond Sherman appeals the district court’s1 denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. . The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of

PER CURIAM. Fontaine Demmond Sherman appeals the district court’s1 denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. . The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of

551 F.3d 45 (2008) UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Alton SHERMAN, Defendant, Appellant. No. 08-1385. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard November 3, 2008. Decided December 22, 2008. *46 Virginia G. Villa, for appellant. Margaret D. McGaughey, Appellate Chief, with whom Paula D. Silsby, United

MEMORANDUM ** Gerald Alan Sherman appeals from the 84-month sentence imposed, on resentenc-ing, following his jury-trial conviction for wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and securities fraud in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 78ff(a), 783(b), and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Sherma

MEMORANDUM ** Gerald Alan Sherman appeals from the 84-month sentence imposed, on resentenc-ing, following his jury-trial conviction for wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and securities fraud in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 78ff(a), 783(b), and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Sherma

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 08-1385 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. ALTON SHERMAN, Appellant. ERRATA The opinion of this Court issued on December 22, 2008, is amended as follows: On page 12, line 4, change "differs" to "differ".

MEMORANDUM ** Gerald Sherman appeals a wire, mail, and securities fraud conviction, as well as the sentence imposed by the district court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. *721§ 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 8742. We affirm the conviction, vacate the sentence, and remand for resentencing. Sherman raises two issues on ap

MEMORANDUM ** Karen Sherman appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1), after the court quashed a writ of garnishment on property Sherman obtained as part of a divorce settlement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, United States v. Real Property at 2659 Rou

344 F.Supp.2d 223 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, v. Alton SHERMAN, Richard Rodrigue, Defendants. No. CR-04-11-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. November 12, 2004. *225 Wendy D. Hatch, Law Offices of Donald F. Brown, Brewer, Leonard I. Sharon, Sharon, Leary & Detroy, Auburn, for Alton Sherman (1), Richard Rodrigue

OPINION OF THE COURT PRATTER, District Judge. The federal government prosecuted Sherman Bobb, contending that he was a kingpin in a drug trafficking operation in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. Following a seven-day trial, the jury convicted him of (1) conspiracy to distribute in excess of 5 kilograms of cocaine, in excess of 1.5 kilograms of cocaine base

MEMORANDUM** Raymond Sherman, Sr., appeals from the district court’s dismissal, without prejudice, of the federal indictment charging him with four counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Sherman's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motio