Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 21-203 (JDB) ALEXANDER SHEPPARD, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Following the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Fischer v. United States, defendant Alexander Sheppard filed a renewed motion for release pending appeal. S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 21-203 (JDB) ALEXANDER SHEPPARD, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION On November 1, 2023, the Court issued an Order denying defendant Alexander Sheppard’s motion for release pending appeal. This Memorandum Opinion explains th

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 21-203 (JDB) ALEXANDER SHEPPARD, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Before the Court is defendant Alexander Sheppard’s motion to delay his self-surrender date. Mot. to Delay Self-Surrender Date [ECF No. 112] (“Mot.”). Sheppard reque

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 21-203 (JDB) ALEXANDER SHEPPARD, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Alexander Sheppard is charged via indictment with six offenses related to the breach of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. Sheppard h

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bradley Shane Sheppard seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of his sentence. The order is not ap-pealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (

PER CURIAM: Tyrone Sheppard seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and, in the alternative, under Fed. R.Crim.P. 35. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed

129 F.3d 615 U.S.v.Sheppard* NO. 96-3033 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Oct 21, 1997 Appeal From: N.D.Fla. ,No.9503082LAC 1 Affirmed.

879 F.Supp. 80 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Scott D. SHEPPARD, Defendant. No. 92-30042. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. February 24, 1995. *81 James E. Beckman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Springfield, IL, for plaintiff. George F. Taseff, Bloomington, IL, for defendant.

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 20-3088 ___________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JASON SHEPPARD, Appellant _________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 2-13-cr-0

983 F.2d 1063 U.S.v.Sheppard** NO. 91-7387 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Jan 21, 1993 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2

DECISION MURDOCK, Judge: The appellant was found guilty, contrary to his pleas, of discharging a firearm in the *860direction of a pickup truck under circumstances to endanger human life, in violation of Article 134, 10 U.S.C. § 934. He had originally been charged with assault with a loaded firearm, in violation of Article 128, 10 U.S.C. § 928. The adj

925 F.2d 1472 U.S.v.Sheppard (Jeremiah) NOS. 89-50294, 89-50268 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. FEB 14, 1991 1 Appeal From: C.D.Cal. 2 AFFIRMED.

Sheppard v United States Tennis Assn. Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 06204) Sheppard v United States Tennis Assn. Inc. 2021 NY Slip Op 06204 Decided on November 10, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New Yor

810 F.2d 207 *U.S.v.Sheppard 86-5202 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. 1/16/87 1 S.D.Fla. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------

784 F.2d 403 **U.S.v.Sheppard 85-5686 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. 2/7/86 1 S.D.Fla. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------

612 F.Supp. 194 (1985) UNITED STATES of America v. Donald J. SHEPPARD. Crim. Nos. 84-50012-03, 5:85-00001. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia. June 24, 1985. *195 *196 Mary S. Feinberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charleston, W.Va., for U.S. Douglas J. Kinz, Clifton, N.J., for defen

762 F.2d 1001 U.S.v.Sheppard 84-5187 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. 4/24/85 1 E.D.Va. AFFIRMED

621 F.Supp. 706 (1985) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. William SHEPPARD, Defendant. No. 82 Cr. 464 (MP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 15, 1985. *707 Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty., S.D. N.Y., New York City, for U.S. of America. Jon M. Kaufman, P.C., New York City, for defendant.

OPINION MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge. The defendant, William Sheppard, moves pursuant to Rule 33, Fed.R.Crim.P., to set aside his conviction on grounds of new evidence and fault of the government in producing documents before trial. He was convicted in September, 1982, of partnership in a scheme whereby $1,256,356.80 was embezzled from Bankers Trust Company by employees of the bank and laundered thr

738 F.2d 433 U.S.v.Sheppard 83-5183 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. 6/22/84 1 E.D.Va. AFFIRMED