Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

OPINION DAVID W. HOUSTON, III, Bankruptcy Judge. On consideration before the court is a complaint filed by Dianne Shankle, (“plaintiff’), against the debtor, Michael Vernon Shankle, (“defendant”), seeking to deny the dischargeability of certain marital obligations that were judicially established in a divorce decree when the plaintiff and the defendant were divorced in Benton County, Arkansas; an

[Cite as Shankle v. Egner, 2012-Ohio-2027.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACQUELINE SHANKLE JUDGES: Hon. John W. Wise, P. J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. Julie A. Edwards, J. Hon. Patricia A. Delane

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. *1085As a result of a physical altercation involving petitioner and two correction officers, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior repo

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered March 23, 2005, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and identification testimony. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

CCA 20100307. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE SPECIFICATION OF CHARGE IV FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXPRESSLY ALLEGE OR NECESSARILY IMPLY THE TERMINAL ELEMENTS OF ARTICLE 134, UCMJ. No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

CCA 20100307. Review granted on the following specified issue: WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. RESENDIZ-PONCE AND RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, AND THIS COURT’S RECENT OPINIONS IN MEDINA, MILLER AND JONES. No briefs

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BOARD OF COUNTY ROAD FOR PUBLICATION COMMISSIONERS FOR THE COUNTY OF March 19, 2019 WASHTENAW, 9:00

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. 2031-01 BRUCE WA

119 S.W.3d 808 (2003) Bruce Wayne SHANKLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. 2031-01. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. November 5, 2003. *809 Bob D. Odom, Belton, for Appellant. James T. Russell, Assistant District Attorney, Belton, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State. Before the court

59 S.W.3d 756 (2001) Bruce Wayne SHANKLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 03-01-00200-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. September 13, 2001. *758 Odom & Hurley, Bob D. Odom, Belton, for appellant. James T. Russell, Administrative Assistant, Belton, for appellee. Before Chief Justice ABOUSSIE,

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 26, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DWIGHT A. SHANKLE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for McMinn County No. 09-086 Carroll L. Ross, Judge No. E2010-01046-CCA-R3-CD - FILED APRIL 21, 2011 The defendant, Dwight A. Shankle, was convicted of facilitation of promotion of the manufactu

Whitbeck, J. The prosecutor appeals, by leave granted, a circuit court order affirming a district court order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence and dismiss the case. We reverse. Defendant Wayne A. Shankle, Jr., was charged with one count of carrying a concealed weapon under MCL 750.227(2); MSA 28.424(2). The evidence at the preliminary examination showed that at 1:40 A.M. on June 18, 1996, Eat

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00200-CR Bruce Wayne Shankle, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 50,368, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING Appellant Bruce Wayne Shankle pleaded guilty

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00200-CR Bruce Wayne Shankle, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee<

885 F.Supp. 996 (1995) Aaron and Yvette SHANKLE, Henry L. and Bobbie Rhodes, Rhonda Alcorn, Gary Paul Rhodes, Anthony Gayden, Alvin Phillips Milton Bowers, Beverly Spencer, Sheree Ford, John Drisdale, Zaki Saleh, Rodney Turpin, Ronald Marshall and Thomas Hayes v. TEXAS CITY and the following persons individually and in their official capacities, Mayor Chuck Doyle, Police Chief Jerry Purdon, and other Unknown Police Officers.

827 S.W.2d 642 (1992) 309 Ark. 40 Jack B. SHANKLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 91-229. Supreme Court of Arkansas. March 30, 1992. *643 Charles L. Honey, Prescott, for appellant. Kent G. Holt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee. GLAZE, Justice. Appellant r

SALMON, Judge. Under Maryland Workers Compensation law, state and municipal police officers (and others) who have heart disease that results in partial or total disability are entitled to a presumption that they have a compensable occupational disease that was suffered in the line of duty. See Md.Code Ann., Lab. & Empl. (“LE”) § 9-503 (1999 Repl.Vol. & Supp.2000).1

414 F.Supp. 160 (1976) UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of SHANKLE-CLAIRDAY, INC. and Norvell & Wallace, Inc. v. J. Harvey CROW and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company. No. 75-68-NA-CV. United States District Court, M. D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. January 9, 1976. *161 H. Frederick Humbracht, Jr

647 P.2d 959 (1982) 58 Or.App. 134 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Ronald James SHANKLE, Appellant. No. 81-07867; CA A22257. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted February 17, 1982. Decided July 8, 1982. *960 Robert N. Peters, Public Defender Services of Lane County, Inc., Eugen