Cases

SUTTON, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Tareq Shalash and his brother, Ziyad, of numerous criminal counts stemming from their operation of a family business that served as a fence for stolen goods. On appeal, the Shalashes argue that: (1) the district court erroneously admitted evidence related to their race and ethnicity; (2) the Government engaged in prosecutorial misconduct during the closing argument; (3) the district co

36 F.Supp.2d 1013 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jamil Mustafa SHALASH, Defendant. No. CR-2-98-175. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 17, 1999. *1014 Sharon J. Zealey, United States Attorney, Deborah A. Solove Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Colu

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

544 U.S. 978 SHALASHv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-1262. Supreme Court of United States. April 18, 2005. 1 C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 108 Fed. Appx. 269.

576 F.Supp.2d 902 (2008) Fares SHALASH, Plaintiff, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, et al., Defendants. No. 07 C 298. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 12, 2008. *904 Kevin Andrew Raica, Azulay, Horn & Seiden, LLC, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. *905 Kurt N

[Cite as State v. Shalash, 2021-Ohio-1034.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 19AP-757 (C.P.C. No. 19CR-2092) v. :

[Cite as State v. Shalash, 2014-Ohio-5006.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NOS. C-130748 C-130749 Plaintiff-Appellee, : TRIAL NOS. B-1207436B B-1208349 vs.

[Cite as State v. Shalash, 2014-Ohio-2584.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2013-06-052 : OPINION - vs -

[Cite as State v. Shalash, 2015-Ohio-3836.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2014-12-146 : OPINION - vs -

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0354p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │

591 F.3d 491 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathaniel BENSON (08-1131) and Cynthia Shank (08-1358), Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 08-1131, 08-1358. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: August 6, 2009. Decided and Filed: January 12, 2010. *494 ARGUED: Brian R. Laxton, Merte

560 F.3d 566 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick CARSON (05-1812); Robert Hey (05-1889); Peter Jacquemain (05-2143), Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Robert Jacquemain, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. 05-1812, 05-1889, 05-2143, 05-2294, 05-2295. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.<

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0122p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - Nos. 05-1812/1889/2143 Pla

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 10a0004p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

ORDER HEWITT, Chief Judge. I. Background Before the court are: Plaintiffs Application for Fees and Other Expenses Under the Equal Access to Justice Act [(EAJA)] (plaintiffs Original Application or Pl.’s App.) first filed July 6, 2005, Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 122 and re-filed August 18, 2009, Dkt. No. 1601 pursuant to the court’s order of July 28, 20

OPINION HEWITT, Chief Judge. Before the court are Plaintiffs Application for Fees and Other Expenses Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (plaintiffs Original Application or Pl.’s Original Appl.), originally submitted to the court on July 5, 2005 and resubmitted and filed on January 2, 2011, Docket Number (Dkt. No.) 181-2; De*756fendant

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted defendant, Reda Ghaza-leh, of conspiracy to possess cocaine and marijuana with the intent to distribute, a violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Defendant now appeals, raising several assignments of error: whether the District Court erred by denying his motion to sever his trial from that of his co-defendant, whether the District C

KEITH, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which SUHRHEINRICH, J., joined. MERRITT, J. (pp. 956-957), delivered a separate concurring opinion. OPINION KEITH, Circuit Judge. ■ Defendant-Appellant Charles H. Foster (Foster) appeals his jury conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base and engaging in monetary t

[J-124-2016] [MO:Saylor, C.J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 74 MAP 2016 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the York : County Court of Common Pleas, :