Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, STEWART, and HACKEL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jordan A. SERRANO Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1457 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. FÉLIX A. SERRANO-BERRÍOS, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1652 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CRISTIAN SERRANO-DELGADO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before STEPHENS, DEERWESTER, and BONNER Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Maria C. SERRANO-LOPEZ Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: Defendant Pedro Serrano appeals from two orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (William H. Pauley III, Judge). Serrano, who was convicted of possessing ammunition as a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C § 922(g)(1), successfully moved for a new trial based on erroneous jury instructions pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33,

16‐4321(L) United States v. Serrano In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2016 Nos. 16‐4321(L); 17‐461(CON) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, United States District Judge: On March 1,2016, Defendant Pedro Serrano was charged in a two-count indictment with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which, inter alia, prohibits felons from possessing ammunition shipped or transported in interstate commerce; and 18 U.S.C. § 981(a), which prohibits a felon convicted of a “crime of violence” from possessing body armo

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *862The Superseding Indictment in this case was filed on November 16, 2017. (Doc. No. 29.) The case is set for trial on September 11, 2018. On September 5, 2018, the same day as the final pretrial conference, the Government filed a Motion to Amend the Indictment (Doc. No. 125) that is

BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is defendant Cristian Serrano-Delgado ("Serrano")'s post-trial motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29 (" Rule 29"). (Docket No. 229.) For the reasons set forth below, Serrano's Rule 29 motion is DENIED . I. Background The Court summarizes the key facts in the light most favorable to

OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge: Defendant Pedro Serrano moves separately for a judgment of acquittal and a new trial under Rules 29 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. For the reasons that follow, Serrano’s motion for a judgment of acquittal is denied and his motion for a new trial is granted. BACKGROUND A two-count indictme

MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, United States District Judge: In its June 9, 2016 Memorandum and Order, this Court reserved- judgment on various motions in limine. (ECF No. 37.) On June 12, 2016, Defendant filed two additional motions in limine and renewed his motion to suppress evidence. (ECF No. 44-45.) At the June 13, 2016 final pretrial conference, the parties made additional arguments re

BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court are several motions in limine by defendant Cristian Serrano-Delgado ("Serrano") and the United States in preparation for the trial scheduled for December 6, 2018. (Docket Nos. 153, 156, 158, 159.) I. United States' Motion Seeking Preclusion of Self-Serving Hearsay The United States moves to preclude Serrano from "eliciting his self-s

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.A. FISCHER, B.T. PALMER, T.H. CAMPBELL Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RENATO M. SERRANO FIRE CONTROLMAN FIRST CLASS (E-6), U.S. NAVY NMCCA 20150

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *920The Court makes the following rulings on two pending motions in this case. I. Motion to Exclude References to Gang Activity and Affiliation in Government's Case in Chief Defendant moves to exclude any reference to his alleged gang activit

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. We address in this case important questions of Fourth Amendment protections in a person's home. As we did in United States v. Delgado-Pérez , 867 F.3d 244 (1st Cir. 2017), we conclude that the governmen

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Serrano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Serrano has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflecte

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Saul Newton Serrano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Serrano has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record r

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ II, District Judge. By indictment filed December 1, 2011, Isfrain Jose Serrano (“Defendant”) is charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possession with intent to distribute cocaine and heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Defendant moves this Court pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedu

BARRON, Circuit Judge. Wilson Serrano-Mercado contends the District Court made two mistakes in sentencing him for a federal gun crime. First, he argues the District Court erred in counting more than one of his prior convictions for Puerto Rico criminal offenses as a conviction for a “crime of violence” under the Sentencing Guidelines. Second, he contends the District Court gave too much significance under those same guidelin

798 F.Supp.2d 634 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Joseph SERRANO. Criminal Action No. 05-67-1. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 18, 2011. *636 Joseph T. Labrurri, III, U.S. Attorney's Office, Philadelphia, PA, for United States of America. Peter C. Bowers, Peter C. Bowers & Assoc., Rossman D. Th