Cases

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.R. MCFARLANE, D.C. KING, M.C. HOLIFIELD Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS H. SEITZ LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201400148 SPECIAL

952 F.Supp. 229 (1997) UNITED STATES of America v. Carl SEITZ. Criminal No. 96-272-2. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 29, 1997. *230 Maryanne Donaghy, United States Attorney's Office, Philadelphia, PA, for U.S. Elizabeth Ainslie, Ainslie & Bronson, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant. <

649 F.2d 870 U. S.v.Seitz 80-1694, 80-1695 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 4/30/81 D.Hawaii MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. Same case below, 385 Fed. Appx. 939.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

53 F.3d 332NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee,v.Lee SEITZ, Respondent-Appellant. No. 93-3957. United States Court of Appeals

400 B.R. 707 (2008) In re Austin David SEITZ and Cherie Ann Seitz, Debtors. Charles W. Riske, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Plaintiff, v. The David Austin Seitz Irrevocable Trust, David H. Seitz, Trustee, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 05-59471-399. Adversary No. 07-4452-705. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri. October 30, 2008.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Opinion Stephen Raslavieh, United States Bankruptcy Judge Introduction Gary F. Seitz, Trustee of the above-captioned estate, has filed a Motion under Rule 9019 to Approve a Compromise of this adversary proceeding with Defen*492dants, Peter Frorer, Frorer Partners, L.P., Frorer Associates, LLC, FCF Credit, Inc., and Tripart

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Sup. Ct. N. C. Cer-tiorari denied.

Sup. Ct. N. C. Cer-tiorari denied.

*88Opinion STEPHEN RASLAVICH, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE. Introduction Gary F. Seitz, Trustee of the above-captioned estate, has filed a sixteen count complaint against Peter Frorer, Frorer Partners, L.P., Frorer Associates, LLC, Tripartite, LLC, and the Prothonotary of the Montgomery Court of Common Pleas. The complaint

OPINION ERIC L. FRANK, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this adversary proceeding, the chapter 7 trustee, Gary Seitz (“the Trustee”), seeks to avoid a pre-petition lien held by Defendant Republic First Bank (“the Bank”) in three (3) investment accounts of the debtor, GEM Refrigerator Co. (“the Debtor”). The accounts are held at Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. t/a Charles Schwab Ins

536 U.S. 923 SEITZv.SPEAGLE ET UX. No. 01-1509. Supreme Court of the United States. June 17, 2002. 1 Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 354 N. C. 525, 557 S. E. 2d 83.

OPINION STEPHEN RASLAVICH, Chief Judge. Introduction Before the Court is the Trustee’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. The Motion is opposed by the Defendants. A hearing on the motion was held on May 3, 2012 after which the Court took the matter under advisement. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be granted in part and denied in part. The Trustee may

302 B.R. 144 (2003) In re CITX CORPORATION, Debtor. Gary Seitz, Chapter 7 Trustee, for CitX Corporation, Inc., v. Lewis B. Freeman, Receiver of Professional Resources Systems International, Inc. a/k/a PRSI, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-19604F. Adversary No. 03-0723. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 3, 2003.

PATRICIA A. SEITZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER is before the Court on Movant Ralph Curry's Motion for Relief from Mandate [DE 36], the Government's Response [DE 38], and the parties' supplemental briefing [DE 42; DE 43]. Citing the Eleventh Circuit's recent published opinion in United States v. Pickett , 916 F.3d 960