Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Sealed Search Warrant and Application and Order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE APPLICATION OF THE UNITED l\/lisc. Action No. 17-2682 (BAH) STATES OF Al\/IERICA FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 2703(D) ChiefJudge Beryl A. I-lowell MEMORANDUM OPINION In October 2017, the government sought an order, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) ofthe Stored Communications Act (“SCA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701 et seq., to compel Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. (“RCCL”) “an internet service provider based in l\/liami,
BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge In October 2017, the government sought an order, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2705(b) of the Stored Communications Act ("SCA"), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701, et seq. ,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO No. 19-mc-44 (BAH) CERTAIN SEALED WARRANT MATERIALS Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Associated Press, Cable News Network, Inc., The New York Times Company, POLITICO LLC, and WP Co., LLC, d/b/a the Washington Post (collectively
In re Search Warrant Issued to Google, Inc.public domain
*1207MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HERMAN N. JOHNSON, JR., UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States served on, Google, Inc., a search warrant issued by the Court pursuant to the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. .§ 2703 et seq. Google challenged the warrant’s applicability to information stored in foreign territory, and pursuant to th
Application of Jason Leopold and Buzzfeed, Inc. for Access to Certain Sealed Court Recordspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION OF Miscellaneous Action No. 20-95 (BAH) JASON LEOPOLD AND BUZZFEED, INC. FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN SEALED Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell COURT RECORDS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On September 17, 2020, petitioners Jason Leopold and Buzzfeed, Inc., applied to this Court for an order di
In re the Search Warrant for [redacted].compublic domain
*973ORDER GRANTING IN PART ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO AMEND INDEFINITE NONDISCLOSURE ORDER ACCOMPANYING SEARCH WARRANT FREDERICK F. MUMM, United States Magistrate Judge I. PROCEEDINGS AND BACKGROUND On November 22, 2016, this Court issued under seal a search warrant (the ‘Warrant”) pursuant
In re Search Warrant executed on March 22, 2016public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENA HANOVICE PALERMO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Movant Justin Smith’s motions to unseal three affidavits supporting the search warrants executed at his home, place of business, and storage unit in March and April of 2016. The motions were referred for disposition and/or recommendation [Dkt. 17].1 On May 20, 2016, the Court issued a
509 F.Supp.2d 76 (2007) In re APPLICATIONS OF the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR ORDERS PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 2703(d). No. MBD-07-10192-RGS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 17, 2007. *77 Stephen P. Heymann, Robert E. Richardson, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for U.S.
In re § 2703(d) Order 10GJ3793public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION THERESA CARROLL BUCHANAN, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter came before the Court the Motion of Real Parties in Interest Jacob Appelbaum, Birgitta Jonsdottir, and Rop Gonggrijp to Vacate December 14, 2010 Order (“Motion to Vacate”, Dkt. 1) and Motion of Real Parties in Interest Jacob AppelBaum, Rop Gonggrijp, and Birgitta Jonsdottir for Unsealing of Sealed Court Rec
In the Matter of the Application of Jason Leopold to Unseal Certain Electronic Surveillance Applications and Orderspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 25, 2019 Decided July 7, 2020 No. 18-5276 IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JASON LEOPOLD TO UNSEAL CERTAIN ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE APPLICATIONS AND ORDERS, JASON LEOPOLD AND REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, APPELLANTS v. UNITED ST
In Re: 2703public domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT In Re: APPLICATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 2703(D) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 11-5151 JACOB APPELBAUM; ROP GONGGRIJP; BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR, Defendants-Appellants, and TWITTER, INCORPORATED, Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JASON LEOPOLD TO UNSEAL Misc. Action No. 13-mc-00712 CERTAIN ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE APPLICATIONS AND ORDERS. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell MEMORANDUM OPINION Jason Leopold and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press filed petitions to unseal voluminous judicial records, dating
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JASON LEOPOLD TO UNSEAL Misc. Action No. 13-mc-00712 CERTAIN ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE APPLICATIONS AND ORDERS. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell MEMORANDUM OPINION Invoking both the First Amendment and common law rights of access to judicial records, Jason Leopold, an investigative journal
In re: Sealed Case (AMENDED REDACTED OPINION)public domain
PUBLIC COPY - SEALED INFORMATION DELETED ~nih~o ~httcs C!Iourt of J\ppcals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 19, 2023 Decided July 18, 2023 Reissued August 9, 2023 No. 23-5044 lNRE: SEALED CASE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:23-sc-00031) Ari Holtzbl
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH [REDACTED]@MAC.COM Magistrate Case. No. 14-228 (JMF) THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY APPLE, INC. SECOND MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is a Renewed Application for a search and seizure warrant pursuant to
In re United States for an Order for Authorization to Obtain Location Data Concerning an At & T Cellular Telephonepublic domain
ORDER MICHAEL P. MILLS, District Judge. This cause comes before the court on the motion of the government, appealing the Magistrate Judge’s denial of its application for a warrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(1)(A) of the Stored Communications Act (SCA), which sought to compel the disclosure of cell phone records to be used as part of an ongoing drug trafficking investigation in this district.
534 F.Supp.2d 585 (2008) In the Matter of the Application of the UNITED STATES of America FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING A PROVIDER OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION SERVICE TO DISCLOSE RECORDS TO THE GOVERNMENT. Magistrate's No. 07-524M. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. February 19, 2008. Soo C. Song, United States Attorney's Office, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff.
In Re: Application for Warrantpublic domain
~` t"`) 1") UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ~ ) APPLICATION FOR WARRANT ) FOR ACCOUNT ~ ) Heoacte:tj , GMAIL_CDM ) MAINTAINED ON COMPUTER SERVERS -) \’\<\ a.g. OPERATED BY GOOGLE, INC., ) Ma'j'. No. 10-29l-M-01 HEADQUARTERED AT ) (A.K/JMF/RCL) _ _ 1600 AMPHITHEATRE PARKWAY ) - __ MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA ’ ) F I L E D ) nov -1 2010 Clark, U.S. District & Bankruptcy MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Cnurts for the District of Columb\a Before the Court is the government’s Motion f
In re the Search of Black Iphone 4public domain
*75MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER , JOHN M. FACCIOLA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court are six Applications for search and seizure warrants pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for various electronic devices that were seized in a hotel room in Solomons, Maryland. See Affidavit In Support of Search W
In Re Search of Electronic Communicationspublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 14-3752 IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS (BOTH SENT AND RECEIVED) IN THE ACCOUNT OF CHAKAFATTAH@GMAIL.COM AT INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER GOOGLE, INC. Chaka Fattah, Appellant _____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Distri