Cases

PER CURIAM: Appellants Eric Schulz and Kelly Schulz (“the Schulzes”) appeal their convictions for conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, and possess with intent to manufacture and distribute more than 100 marijuana plants, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(B)(vii). On appeal, the Schulzes argue that the district court erred in denying their motions to suppress statements made before and during the search

07-3729-cv USA v. Schulz UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2007 (Argued: February 4, 2008 Decided: February 22, 2008) Docket No. 07-3729-cv _____________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

529 F.Supp.2d 341 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Robert L. SCHULZ; We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc.; and We the People Congress, Inc., Defendants. No. 1:07-cv-0352. United States District Court, N.D. New York. August 9, 2007. *342 *343

517 F.3d 606 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert L. SCHULZ, We The People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc., and We The People Congress, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 07-3729-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: February 4, 2008. Decided: February 22, 2008. Arthur T. Catterall,

MEMORANDUM—DECISION AND ORDER Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, United States District Court Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff pro se Robert L. Schulz brings this action against Defendant United States (“the Government”), under 26 U.S.C. § 6703(c)(2), alleging that he received an erroneous tax assessment penalty from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in the amount of $225,000 related to his pro

Slip Op. 23-51 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE SXP SCHULZ XTRUDED PRODUCTS LLC, Plaintiff, Before: Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge v. Court No. 22-00136 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [Granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROBERT L. SCHULZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 21-cv-448 (DLF) CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is the plaintiffs’ Motion for Expedited Summary Judgment, Dkt. 2, and Motio

MEMORANDUM ** Robert L. Schulz appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his petition to quash a third party summons directed at PayPal in connection with an investigation of Schulz’s internet tax evasion scheme. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The district court’s decision to enforce an IRS summons will not be disturbed unless its finding that the summonses were issued for a

487 F.2d 1399 U. S.v.Schulz 73-1800 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit 12/26/73 1 M.D.N.C. AFFIRMED

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff Robert L. Schulz appeals the dismissal of his petition to quash an IRS third-party subpoena pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7609(b)(2), and of his request for injunctive relief against the defendants named in this action. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the issues on appeal and the procedural history. Upon a review of the record, we conclude that the District Court did not err

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada denied. Same case below, 126 Nev. 754.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. *514Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Same case below, 370 Fed. Appx. 201.

105 F.3d 127 Axel SCHULZ; Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd.; Der FirmerSauerland Promotion, A.G.; Wilfried Sauerland,v.UNITED STATES BOXING ASSOCIATION; International BoxingFederation, a Division Thereof; Francois Botha;Michael Moorer,Francois Botha, Appellant in 96-5200.United States Boxing Association and International BoxingFederation, Appellant in 96-5239. Nos. 96-5200, 96-5239.

776 F.2d 1049 Schulzv.U.S. 84-3115 United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. 9/4/85 1 E.D.Wis. AFFIRMED

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT AUGUST 19, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN

Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.