Cases

SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Philroy Johnson developed a penchant for illegally carrying firearms. When he pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm with an obliterated serial number, that was his fifth firearm conviction. The district court varied upward from the guidelines range by 14 months and sentenced him to the statutory maximum: 60 months. Because the sentence was procedurally and substa

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants Estates of Ernest and Judit Gottdiener, Ervin Tausky, and Suan Investments (“Plaintiffs”) appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dismissing their claims against Defendants-Appellees Felix Sater and Salvatore Lauria (“Defendants”) for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq.

OPINION AND ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: On March 18, 2013, Plaintiffs commenced this civil suit against Defendants for violations of the Racketeer Influenced *389and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). On August 2, 2013, Plaintiffs filed the First Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”). The case is now before this Court on Def

ORDER Appellee, United States of America, filed a petition for panel rehearing, or, in the alternative, for rehearing en banc. The panel that determined the appeal has considered the request for panel rehearing, and the active members of the Court have considered the request for rehearing en banc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied.

813 F.Supp.2d 210 (2011) Kenneth W. JONES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 11-203 (JEB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 28, 2011. *211 Kenneth W. Jones, Cleveland, OH, pro se. Thomas McLean Nanni, Social Security Administration Office of the Genera

ORDER SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Bankruptcy Trustee Michael Baker’s motion to stay second final order of forfeiture (Doc. No. 151). For the reasons that follow, this motion is not well-taken and is DENIED. From 1999 through March 2002, the Defendant in this case, A. William Erpen-beck, perpetrated through his home construction b

AMENDED OPINION WHITE, Circuit Judge. The United States appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and grant of the State of Ohio’s and Buckingham Coal Company’s (“Buckingham”) motions for summary judgment in this action challenging Ohio’s right to lease Buckingham the right to mine coal lying beneath land acquired for a flo

OPINION and ORDER Gordon, Judge: This action involves the fourth administrative review (and aligned new shipper review) conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce' (“Commerce”) of the anti-dumping duty order covering steel wire garment hangers from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). See Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the PRC, 73 Fed. Reg. 58,111

REYNA, Circuit Judge. Appellants appeal a decision of the U.S. Court of International Trade that affirmed a U.S. Department of Commerce determination to select Thailand as the surrogate country for China in the second administrative review of an antidumping duty order on certain steel threaded rod from China. 1 We hold

Order (1) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Relators’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and (2) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ and Relators’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 249) and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 256). This False Claims Act lawsuit concer

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

532 F.3d 423 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. A. William ERPENBECK, Jr., Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 06-4247, 06-4248, 06-4386, 06-4389. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: April 23, 2008. Decided and Filed: July 2, 2008. *425 ARGUED: Eric W.

ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., District Judge. This is a qui tam action where the government declined to intervene. It is be*1340fore the Court on Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 28], Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Relators’ First Amended Complaint [Doc. 35], and Relat

OPINION GOLDBERG, Senior Judge: Plaintiff CP Kelco U.S. (“Kelco”), a domestic manufacturer of xanthan gum and petitioner in the antidumping proceeding that underlies this case, challenges the final determination of the International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) that domestic industry suffered no present material injury by reason of subject imports. Xanthan Gum from Austria and China

490 F.Supp.2d 885 (2007) UNITED STATES Of America, v. Ronald J. BOGART, et al, Defendants. No. C2-01-CR-164. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. June 1, 2007. *886 *887 *888 Brenda S. Shoemaker, United States Attorney's Office, Columb

OPINION AND ORDER RESTANI, Judge: This action challenges the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) final results rendered in the first antidumping (“AD”) review of certain steel threaded rods (“STR”) from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). See Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Fi

295 F.Supp.2d 816 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Respondents, v. Bradford Lee BUTLER, Jr., Petitioner. No. C2-03-531. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. December 11, 2003. *817 Daniel Allen Brown, United States Attorney's Office, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiffs. David Freeman Axelrod, Vorys Sater Sey

*381 OPINION BASKIR, Judge. Plaintiff Cygnus Corporation, Inc. (Cygnus) is the incumbent contractor providing services to meet the general research and support requirements of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), an operating division -within the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Cygnus filed this bid protest

621 F.3d 465 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Board of Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, *466 City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF LOVELAND, OHIO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-3116. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: August 6, 2010.

533 F.Supp.2d 1348 (2008) BRATSK ALUMINUM SMELTER and Rual Trade Limited, Plaintiffs, and Sual Holding and Zao Kremny, and General Electric Silicones LLC, Plaintiff-Intervenors v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Globe Metallurgical Inc. and Simcala, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 08-5. Court No. 03-00200. United States Court of International Trade. January 15, 2008