Cases

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves for summary affirmance of the April 30, 1998 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting the United States’ motion for summary judgment. Leonardo Nery et al. oppose. Nery et al. served the United States as New Philippine Scouts during and after World War II. Nery et al. filed a civil action

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 29, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk

Appellate Case: 20-2145 Document: 010110830843 Date Filed: 03/22/2023 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 22, 2023

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Evidence, filed August 17, 2018 (Doc. 236)("MIL 1"). The Court held a hearing on September 14, 2018. The primary issue is whether evidence of land use by other than Plaintiff Pueblo of Jemez after 1848 -- the year when the Pueblo Indians can under United States jurisdiction -- is

Duefee, Senior Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: These cases are before the court on an interlocutory appeal by the Government from a decision of the Indian Claims Commission, rendered on May 9, 1973, and reported in 30 Ind. Cl. Comm. 234 (1973). The three Indian pueblos of San Ildefonso, Santo Domingo and Santa Clara filed claims with the Commission, pursuant to clause 4 of section 2 of the

OPINION FUTEY, Judge. Plaintiff, Pueblo of Santo Domingo, moves the court to amend a 1969 stipulation and map setting forth defendant’s liability for extinguishing plaintiff’s aboriginal title to certain lands. Defendant contends this court can not entertain plaintiff’s motion because it is untimely and jurisdictionally barred pursuant to section 12 of the Indian Claims Commission Act. For the reasons stated

NICHOLS, Judge, dissenting: The court is denying the motions without oral argument or receipt of any testimony. I dissent, respectfully, because I do not think we should make a decision on the grounds given without the facts we do not have and which a trial judge could provide. I favor a remand to obtain those facts. The panel has such a useful set of assumptions it does not need facts.

167 U.S. 529 (1897) WHITNEY v. UNITED STATES. No. 271. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 9, 1897. Decided May 24, 1897. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. *534 Mr. John H. Knaeble for appellants. Mr. Matthew G. Reynolds for appellees. Mr. Solicitor General was on

Davis, J., delivered the opinion of the court: This court has now delivered three opinions upon general issues raised in the French Spoliations Cases. The first related to the broad questions as to the validity, against France, of the claims as a class, and the resulting liability of the United States to the claimants; the second was directed more especially to forms of pleading, the value of evidence, and righ

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: June 16, 2016 4 NO. S-1-SC-34287 5 HAMAATSA, INC., 6 a New Mexico not-for-profit corporation, 7 Plaintiff-Respondent, 8 v. 9 PUEBLO OF SAN FELIPE, 10 a federally recognized Indian tribe, 11 Defendant-Petitioner. 12 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI 13 John F. Davis, District Judge 14 Samuel D. Gollis, Attorney at Law, P.C. 15 Samuel D. Gollis 16 Gwenellen P. Janov

OPINION ALARID, Judge. {1} This case presents a question of the State’s jurisdiction to prosecute a member of Taos Pueblo charged with committing an aggravated battery upon another member of Taos Pueblo on land located within the original boundaries of the land grant from the King of Spain to Taos Pueblo, but which is now part of the town of Taos, New Mexico. We hold that by

BRORBY, Circuit Judge. Neighbors for Rational Development, Inc. (“Neighbors”), appeals a district court order upholding a decision made by the Secretary of the United States Department of Interior (“Secretary”) to acquire certain property in trust for the nineteen Indian Pueblos of New Mexico. After reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments, we conclude that to the extent

145 P.3d 738 (2006) Sue Sun Won WITTIG, And As To Some Claims, On Behalf of the Class of Other Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLIANZ, A.G.,; Fireman's Fund, and Nelson B. Befitel, Director, Department of Labor, State of Hawai`i, Defendants-Appellees, and John Doe 1-10, et al., Defendants. No. 26227. Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai`i. June 26, 2006.

Mr. Justice del Toro delivered the opinion of the court. This is an action for the acknowledgment of certain annuities and the collection of interest thereon. The action was brought by Bishop Jones of the Catholic Church, of Porto Rico against the present owners of house No. 7 Cristo. Street, San Juan, P. R. The complaint was demurred to and the demurrer was overruled. After a trial the district court entered judg

Rodey, Judge, delivered tbe following opinion: This is an action of ejectment, wherein tbe plaintiff seeks to recover tbe possession of tbe south half of a building on San Justo street, in the city of San Juan, Porto Rico, from tbe defendants, and to have an accounting for tbe rental value thereof at $45 per month, with interest on tbe deferred payments for something like eleven years last past. Tbe suit invo