Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Santos”
United States v. SANTOSpublic domain
Before KISOR, HARRELL, and PICTON Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Victor SANTOS Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
United States v. SANTOSpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KISOR, FLUHR, and MIZER Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Patricia A. SANTOS Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marin
United States v. Santos Castropublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4685 Doc: 51 Filed: 02/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 39 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4656 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MOISES ORLANDO ZELAYA-VELIZ, a/k/a Moises Zelaya-Beliz, Moizes Zelaya Bonilla, a/k
United States v. Santospublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Patti B. Saris, Chief United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Pro se petitioner Sherwin Santos has moved the Court to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He alleges ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amend*146ment. Docket No. 30. The motion is DENIED.
United States v. Santos-Rodriguezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lazaro Santos-Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. Cali*485fornia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Santos-Rodrigue
United States v. Santospublic domain
Slip Op. 13- 154 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, Before: Richard W. Goldberg, Senior Judge v. Court No. 13-00025 ALEJANDRO SANTOS and ALEJANDRO SANTOS, CHB, Defendants.
United States v. Santos Casaspublic domain
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Three defendants appeal their convictions for conspiracy to manufacture and distribute controlled substances and related charges. These defendants were part of a group of thirty-seven people who were indicted for a drug conspiracy after a mul-ti-year FBI investigation that recorded over 77,000 telephone calls. Other than the three defendants here (
United States v. Santos-Sotopublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. After a six-day jury trial, Defendants-Appellants Norma Santos-Soto (“Santos”) and Carlos Plaza-Santiago (“Plaza”), former police agents of the Puerto Rico Police, were convicted of conspiracy to injure, oppress, threaten, and intimidate persons in the town of Arecibo in the exercise of their constitutional rights in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Count 1)
United States v. Santos Casaspublic domain
Case: 14-40046 Document: 00513311818 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2015 REVISED DECEMBER 16, 2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 14-40046 FILED
United States v. Santos Zamora-Salazarpublic domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: Defendant-Appellant Santos Alfonso Zamora-Salazar appeals his convictions for conspiracy to import and importation of methamphetamine. He also appeals the sentencing enhancement imposed by the district court. For the following reasons, we affirm the convictions and sentence. I. Facts & Procedural History
United States v. Santospublic domain
OPINION POGUE, Chief Judge: This is an action by United States Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) to recover civil penalties from a customs broker, Mr. Alejandro Santos (“Santos”), for violating Customs’ regulations. Customs’ Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 10, filed pursuant to USCIT R. 55(b), is currently before the court. B
United States v. Santos Centenopublic domain
OPINION SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge. Baldwin and Santos Centeno appeal their convictions and sentences arising *382 from violent assaults at the Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia. 1 Each challenges th
United States v. Santospublic domain
CCA 37669. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to November 2, 2011.
United States v. Santos Chavarria-Ortizpublic domain
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Santos Chavarria-Ortiz pleaded guilty to one count of illegal reentry after removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court 1 determined an advisory sentencing guideline range of 70 to 87 months’ imprisonment, rejected Cha-varria-Ortiz’s request for a downward variance
United States v. Santos-Riverapublic domain
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Following a sixteen-day trial, a jury convicted the defendants on conspiracy and drug possession charges stemming from their role in a criminal organization operating a 24-hour “drug point” in the Jesus T. Piñero Public Housing Project in Canóvanas, Puerto Rico. Each of the three defendants was convicted of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute at
United States v. Santospublic domain
OPINION BARRY, Circuit Judge. Angel Santos (“Santos”) was convicted on two counts of heroin distribution and one count of possession with intent to distribute heroin, and sentenced to 240 months’ imprisonment. He appeals his conviction and sentence on a variety of grounds. We will affirm. I. Because we write solely for the parties, we presume familiarity with the fa
United States v. Santospublic domain
589 F.3d 759 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone SANTOS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-31225. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 2, 2009. *761 Josette Louise Cassiere, Carol Mignonne Griffing, Asst. U.S. Attys., Shreveport, LA, for U.S. Wayne Joseph Blanchard, Fed. Pub. Def., L
United States v. Santospublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Defendant Deonte Santos was convicted of using a facility or means of interstate commerce to persuade, induce, and entice *224a minor to engage in unlawful sexual conduct, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422(b) and 2 (Count I), and sex trafficking of a child, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§
United States v. Santospublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Defendant Deonte Santos was convicted of using a facility or means of interstate commerce to persuade, induce, and entice *224a minor to engage in unlawful sexual conduct, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422(b) and 2 (Count I), and sex trafficking of a child, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§
United States v. Santospublic domain
OPINION BARRY, Circuit Judge. Angel Santos (“Santos”) was convicted on two counts of heroin distribution and one count of possession with intent to distribute heroin, and sentenced to 240 months’ imprisonment. He appeals his conviction and sentence on a variety of grounds. We will affirm. I. Because we write solely for the parties, we presume familiarity with the fa