Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Sanchez-Garcia”
United States v. Sanchez-Garciapublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roman Sanchez-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Sanchez-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
United States v. Sanchez-Garciapublic domain
642 F.3d 658 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto SANCHEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-2266. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: February 15, 2011. Filed: June 22, 2011. *660 Richard Haile McWilliams, AFPD, argued, Omaha, NE, for appellant. Debra K.
United States v. Sanchez-Garciapublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Moisés Sanchez-Garcia appeals from the 63-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm, but remand to correct the judgment. Sanchez-Garcia contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district cour
United States v. Sanchez-Garciapublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Moisés Sanchez-Garcia appeals from the 63-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm, but remand to correct the judgment. Sanchez-Garcia contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because the district cour
United States v. Sanchez-Garciapublic domain
501 F.3d 1208 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis SANCHEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-2262. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. September 6, 2007. *1209 Terri J. Abernathy, Assistant United States Attorney (David C. Iglesias, United States Attorney, with her on the brief), Las Cruc
United States v. Sanchez-Garciapublic domain
*912MEMORANDUM** Victor Sanchez-Garcia appeals his sentence for conspiring to export cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963 and being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because Sanchez-Garcia did not challenge his resentencing on Sixth Amendment gro
United States v. Sanchez-Garciapublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated cases, Victor Sanchez-Garcia appeals pro se the district court’s partial denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his concurrent sentences of 360 months for conspiracy to export a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 963, 953, and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and 120 months for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1
United States v. Sanchez-Garciapublic domain
PER CURIAM: Jose Sanchez-Garcia (Sanchez) appeals the sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for being found in the United States after a prior deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). He argues that the district court erred in going beyond the statute of conviction and the charging instrument to determine that
United States v. Sanchez-Garciapublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant Bernardo Sanchez-Garcia appeals his sentence of 97 months imposed after a plea of guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and one count of aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2(a).<
United States v. Jorge Sanchez-Garciapublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 22-4072 Doc: 108 Filed: 04/04/2024 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-4072 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JORGE SANCHEZ-GARCIA, a/k/a Jorge Sa
Sanchez-Garcia v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
United States v. Saul Garcia-Sanchezpublic domain
CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: Defendant-Appellant Saul Garcia-Sanchez appeals his 37-month sentence of imprisonment following his guilty plea conviction of illegal reentry after deportation. We affirm. I. Facts & Procedural History Garcia-Sanchez is a citizen of El Salvador not authorized to live in the United States.
United States v. Garcia-Sanchezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Angel Garcia-Sanchez *885has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in "accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Sanchez has
United States v. Fernando Sanchez-Garciapublic domain
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Torrance Bunch and Fernando Sanchez-Garcia were each convicted by a jury of *749 conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii), and 846. The jury also found Bunch guilty of three
Sanchez-Garcia v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Garcia-Sanchezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rolando Garcia-Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Garcia-Sanchez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, co
United States v. v. Sanchez-Garciapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-3561 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States
United States v. Garcia-Sanchezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Gerardo Garcia-Sanchez appeals from the 47-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 *427U.S.C. § 1826. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Garcia-Sanchez contends that after Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530
United States v. Garcia-Sanchezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Gerardo Garcia-Sanchez appeals from the 47-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 *427U.S.C. § 1826. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Garcia-Sanchez contends that after Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530
Sanchez-Garcia v. United Statespublic domain
543 U.S. 1115 SANCHEZ-GARCIAv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-7647. Supreme Court of United States. January 24, 2005. 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 670; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, an