⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Sanchez-Cuevas”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-01-07 · Published · cited 0× · 534 U.S. 1099; 122 S. Ct. 853
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987-06-29 · Published · cited 73× · 821 F.2d 248; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9524; 56 U.S.L.W. 2059
GEE, Circuit Judge: Jesus Fernando Cuevas-Sanchez appeals his conviction of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. In the district court, Cuevas moved to suppress the evidence used to convict him on the ground that it was derived from the unlawful video surveillance of his property. The district court denied this motion and, after Cuevas waived a jury trial, found hi
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011-04-19 · Published · cited 0× · 423 F. App'x 368
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Sanchez-Magana (Sanchez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the releva
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-09-09 · Published · cited 0× · 292 F. App'x 622
HUG, Circuit Judge: I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority on all aspects except for those reasons set forth in section 5. The majority mentions an agreement of the parties that the convictions would not be presented to the jury. That agreement was in the prior trial that was dismissed as a mistrial. In that trial, the parties had discussed the possible admission of the convictions for the impeach
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 274 F. App'x 364
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Pedro Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Sanchez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to wit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 546 U.S. 904; 126 S. Ct. 251; 163 L. Ed. 2d 229; 74 U.S.L.W. 3209; 2005 U.S. LEXIS 6623
C. A: 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002-02-19 · Published · cited 14× · 282 F.3d 74; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2832
282 F.3d 74 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.George RIVERA, Ward Johnson, Luis Gautier, Ralph Hernandez, Jamie Cuevas, Victor Briggs, Anthony Briggs, Willie Claussen, Kenroy Prentice, George Vasquez, Elizabeth Velasquez, Desiree Sidberry, Ketty Turino, Andrew Simmons, Ruben Rodriquez, John Marrero, Vicki Dowdy, Madeline Rodriquez, Mark Sanchez, Albert Delmoral, Edgardo Delmoral, Anthony Garay, Veronica Aviles, Matthew Williams, Jonathan
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000-06-21 · Published · cited 21× · 282 F.3d 74
PER CURIAM. Defendant-appellant Walter David Cook has petitioned this court for rehearing based on our summary order of June 21, 2000 affirming Cook’s conviction and sentence. We deny the petition, but write to explain why Cook’s sentence was not unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), which was decided after our order had i
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-07-27 · Published · cited 14× · 41 F.4th 732
Case: 19-50855 Document: 00516409077 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/27/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 27, 2022
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-11-05 · Published · cited 4× · 120 F.4th 1313
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1950 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHARLES HOUSE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Sout
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-11-05 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1950 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHARLES HOUSE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Sout
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-08-15 · Published · cited 19× · 77 F.4th 1228
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-50167 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 8:16-cr-00054- v. CJC-1 LEON CURTIS ECKFORD, AKA Porky, AKA Spank, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021-06-02 · Published · cited 33× · 998 F.3d 1094
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit June 2, 2021 PUBLISH Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025-02-13 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 22-12800 Document: 141-1 Date Filed: 02/13/2025 Page: 1 of 46 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12800 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019-05-16 · Published · cited 1× · 385 F. Supp. 3d 721
HON. PAMELA PEPPER, United States District Judge On February 19, 2019, Magistrate Judge David E. Jones issued a report recommending that this court deny defendant Fontae Kelly's motion to suppress the fruits of a video surveillance search. Dkt. No. 219. The defendant filed a timely objection to the recommendation, dkt. no. 223, and the government responded, dkt. no. 225. Because the court finds that the defendant did not have a reas
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022-06-09 · Published · cited 11× · 36 F.4th 320
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 19-1582 19-1625 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. NIA MOORE-BUSH, a/k/a Nia Dinzey, Defendant, Appellee. Nos. 19-1583 19-1626 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. DAPHNE MOORE
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022-01-20 · Published · cited 16× · 23 F.4th 153
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 16-2089 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JEFFRI DÁVILA-REYES, Defendant, Appellant. No. 16-2143 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ D. REYES-VALDIVIA,
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021-07-14 · Published · cited 20× · 4 F.4th 505
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-2352 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRAVIS TUGGLE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992-07-30 · Published · cited 107× · 971 F.2d 876; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17609
971 F.2d 876 36 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 554 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.George RIVERA, Ward Johnson, Walter David Cook, LuisGautier, Ralph Hernandez, Jaime Cuevas, Victor Briggs,Anthony Briggs, Willie Claussen, Kenroy Prentice, Bob Lemon,John Doe, Elizabeth Velasquez, Desiree Sidberry, KettyTurino, Andrew Simmons, Ruben Rodriguez, John Marrero,Raymond Marrero, Vickie Dowdy, Madeline Rodr
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992-07-30 · Published · cited 162× · 971 F.2d 876
J. DANIEL MAHONEY, Circuit Judge: Defendants-appellants George Rivera (also known as “Boy George”), Ketty Turi-no (“K. Turino”), Vickie Dowdy, Anthony Garay, Danny Delgado, Arycelis Turino (“A. Turino”), and Anthony Cruz appeal from judgments of conviction for engaging in a conspiracy to distribute heroin and (in the case of Rivera) attempted income tax evasion entered, after a jury trial, in the United States District Court