⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Salmon”

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2025-09-09 · Published · cited 0×
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HARRELL, GANNON and de GROOT Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Marrio M. SALMON Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps
District Court, S.D. Texas · 1981-01-13 · Published · cited 1× · 504 F. Supp. 1270; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10314
504 F.Supp. 1270 (1981) UNITED STATES of America v. Rene Ruben SALMON. Crim. No. B-80-524. United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Brownsville Division. January 13, 1981. *1271 *1272 Charles Lewis, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brownsville, Tex., for plaintiff. Daniel Alfaro, Corpus Christi, Te
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 476 F. App'x 749
OPINION PER CURIAM. Salmon petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) August 11, 2011 order upholding the decision of the Immigration Judge denying Salmon’s request for a continuance of his removal proceedings while he pursued post-conviction relief and ordering Salmon removed to Jamaica. The Government filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the petition for review was not timely f
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972-01-07 · Published · cited 0× · 455 F.2d 608
455 F.2d 608 *United Statesv.Salmon 71-2659 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit Jan. 7, 1972 1 N.D.Fla. 2 (The decision of the Court is referenced in a 'Table o
United States Court of International Trade · 2009-05-13 · Published · cited 2× · 626 F. Supp. 2d 1277; 33 Ct. Int'l Trade 515; 33 C.I.T. 515; 31 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1410; 2009 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 41
626 F.Supp.2d 1277 (2009) SALMON SPAWNING & RECOVERY ALLIANCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Slip Op. 09-40., Court No. 06-00191. United States Court of International Trade. May 13, 2009. *1278 Marten Law Group PLLC (Svend Brandt-Erichsen) for Plaintiffs. Michael F. Hertz, Deputy Assistant Attorney G
Jackson v. Salmonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-10-21 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 474; 187 L. Ed. 2d 321; 82 U.S.L.W. 3234; 571 U.S. 975; 2013 WL 4402306; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7642
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008-07-15 · Published · cited 4× · 532 F.3d 1338; 38 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20175; 30 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1257; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14915; 2008 WL 2736031
532 F.3d 1338 (2008) SALMON SPAWNING & RECOVERY ALLIANCE, Native Fish Society and Clark-Skamania Flyfishers, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES Customs and Border Protection, Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of the Interior, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Carlos Gutierrez, Secretary of Commerce, United States Department of Commerce, D. Robert Lohn, in his official capacity, Deborah J. Spero,
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997-11-13 · Published · cited 17× · 719 A.2d 949; 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 262; 1997 WL 703058
RUIZ, Associate Judge, dissenting: This ease is one of first impression under the Jury Trial Amendment Act of 1994, D.C. Law 10-232, D.C.Code § 16-705(c) (1997) (“JTAA”). I agree with the majority that although Salmon’s trial counsel did not explicitly state the reasons now advanced on appeal in support of a mistrial, we should review the trial court’s ruling on the merits for abuse of discretion. The unantici
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997-04-29 · Published · cited 0× · 114 F.3d 1174; 1997 WL 230871; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 12122
114 F.3d 1174 U.S.v.Ricky Salmon NO. 96-1625 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Apr 29, 1997 Appeal From: E.D.Pa. ,No.95-cr-00409 1 Affirmed.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 568 U.S. 820; 133 S. Ct. 409
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011-12-09 · Published · cited 17× · 663 F.3d 1378; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24408; 2011 WL 6117297
663 F.3d 1378 (2011) Victoria V. SALMON, Petitioner, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. No. 2011-3029. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. December 9, 2011. *1379 Phillip R. Kete, of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. *1380 Hillary A. Stern, Senior Trial Cou
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008-12-18 · Published · cited 43× · 550 F.3d 1121; 39 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20304; 68 ERC (BNA) 1041; 30 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1865; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 27452; 2008 WL 5247721
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. This case concerns the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) and the scope of the jurisdiction of the United States Court of International Trade. Plaintiffs-Appellants Salmon Spawning and Recovery Alliance, Native Fish Society, and Clark-Skamania Flyfishers (collectively “Salmon Spawning” or “plaintiffs”) appeal
United States Court of International Trade · 2000-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 101 F. Supp. 2d 821; 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 263; 24 C.I.T. 263; 2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 44
101 F.Supp.2d 821 (2000) COALITION FOR FAIR ATLANTIC SALMON TRADE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, and Asociación de Productores de Salmón Y Trucha de Chile AG, and Aguas Claras S.A., Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 00-43, No. 98-09-02782. United States Court of International Trade. April 20, 2000. Collier, Shannon, Rill & Scott, PLLC,
Salmon v. NDCpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002-06-24 · Published · cited 0× · 40 F. App'x 560
MEMORANDUM** Taxpayer Sam Salmon, dba Salmon Construction (Salmon), appeals from the district court’s summary judgment holding that: (1) the Internal Revenue Service had a tax lien with priority over attorney fees earned by Salmon’s attorney, Kevin Mirch; and (2) the IRS was entitled to the full *561amount of the tax lien. We have jurisdiction under
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991-11-12 · Published · cited 22× · 948 F.2d 776; 292 U.S. App. D.C. 184; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26532; 1991 WL 230045
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge: In compliance with a plea agreement, Fitzroy Salmon entered a plea of guilty to three counts of distributing cocaine powder (in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & *778 841(b)(l)(A)(iii)).
District Court, D. Maine · 2004-03-10 · Published · cited 0× · 307 F. Supp. 2d 187; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3756; 2004 WL 439954
307 F.Supp.2d 187 (2004) UNITED STATES PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP et al., Plaintiffs v. ATLANTIC SALMON OF MAINE, LLC, Defendant No. CIV. 00-151-B-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. March 10, 2004. *188 Bruce M. Merrill, Portland, ME, David A. Nicholas, National Environmental Law Center, Boston, MA, Charles C. Caldart
District Court, D. Maine · 2003-02-13 · Published · cited 1× · 243 F. Supp. 2d 2; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2107; 2003 WL 328436
243 F.Supp.2d 2 (2003) UNITED STATES PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, et al., Plaintiffs v. ATLANTIC SALMON OF MAINE, LLC, Defendant No. CIV. 00-151-B-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. February 13, 2003. Bruce M. Merrill, Portland, Charles C. Caldart, Seattle, WA, David A. Nicholas, Joseph J. Mann, Joshua R. Kratka, Boston, MA, for United States Public Inter
Byrd v. Salmonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2000-06-26 · Published · cited 0× · 530 U.S. 1259; 120 S. Ct. 2710
Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Byrd v. Salmonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2000-06-26 · Published · cited 0× · 530 U.S. 1259
Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
Carrillo v. Salmonpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2000-02-28 · Published · cited 0× · 528 U.S. 1186; 120 S. Ct. 1238
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and ease remanded for further consideration in light of Roe v. Flores-Ortega, ante, p. 470.