Cases

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

Case: 19-50855 Document: 00516409077 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/27/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 27, 2022

Appellate Case: 22-3010 Document: 010110685424 Date Filed: 05/17/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 17, 2022

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 18-1993 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. HERZZON SANDOVAL, a/k/a Casper, Defendant, Appellant. No. 18-2165 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. EDWIN GUZMAN, a/k/a Playa, Defe

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0164p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Rene Garcia appeals from a two-level sentencing enhancement for possession of a dangerous weapon in connection with a drug offense under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) § 2Dl.l(b)(l). Garcia argues that the district judge unfairly relied on testimony that the district judge had heard in a separate criminal proceeding

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Jesus Ibarra-Diaz appeals from his conviction for possession with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(B)(viii), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Mr. Ibarra-Diaz asserts four claims of error on appeal: (1) the district court violated his Sixth Amendment confrontati

PER CURIAM: Defendants-Appellants J. Jeffrey Pruett, Louisiana Land & Water Co., and LWC Management, who own and operate *237numerous wastewater treatment facilities, were charged with knowingly violating the Clean Water Act. After a ten-day trial, Defendants-Appellants were convicted on multiple counts. They now appeal their convictions and sentences. Fo

HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Distilled, this appeal raises a pure question of statutory interpretation. Congress criminalizes obstructing “the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress.” 18 U.S.C. § 1505. The defendant contends, and th

589 F.Supp.2d 777 (2008) UNITED STATES of America v. Demond Andrew ALEXANDER. Criminal Action No. 4:08-CR-104. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division. August 27, 2008. *780 Maureen E. Smith, U.S. Attorney's Office, Sherman, TX, for Plaintiff. Denise S. Benson, Federal Defender's Office, Sherman, TX, for

512 F.3d 1268 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. and United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adalberto Aguilar-Banuelos, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 07-4040, 07-4063[*]. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. January 15, 2008. *1269

DENNIS, Circuit Judge: This case is before us on appeal of defendant Mario Alfredo Salinas’s conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM Salinas’s conviction. I. Background and Proceedings Below At

339 F.Supp.2d 781 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lorena CORRAL, Defendant. No. EP-04-CR-543-PRM. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. October 1, 2004. *782 *783 *784 Stephen G. Jurecky, U.S. Attorneys Office, El Paso,

241 F.Supp.2d 1164 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Nic T. LOGAN, Wendy J. Darnall and Bennie U. Reed, Defendants. Nos. 02-40051-01-SAC, 02-40051-02-SAC, 02-40051-03-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 16, 2002. *1168 Marilyn M. Trubey, David J. Phillips, Office of Federal Public Defender, Topeka,

388 F.3d 1199 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Frank FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Roy Gavaldon, aka Spider, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David Gonzales-Contreras, aka David Contreras-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Dominick Shewmaker Gonzales, aka Solo, aka Domi

911 F.Supp. 261 (1995) UNITED STATES of America v. Victor Manuel DOMINGUEZ. Criminal No. L-95-241. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Laredo Division. December 26, 1995. *262 Juan Ramon Flores, Federal Public Defenders Office, Laredo, TX, Adriana Arce-Flores, Fed. Public Defender, Laredo, TX, Victor Manuel Dominguez, Rio B

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. After his trial and conviction on one count of using the United States Postal Service to facilitate possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, one count of possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute, and one count of conspiracy, Lafayette James was sentenced to 188 months in prison. James now appeals several aspects of his tri

*1487EBEL, Circuit Judge. The defendant-appellant, Carmen Maestas, appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence of marijuana found in her car at a fixed Border Patrol checkpoint in New Mexico as well as certain incriminating statements she made while at the checkpoint. She contends that she was subject to a pretextual seizure when she passed