Cases

PER CURIAM.* Armando Lozano-Salazar appeals his conviction of being found in the United *925States following deportation after conviction of an aggravated felony. He argues, for the first time on appeal, that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it treats a prior conviction for a felony or aggravated felony as a sentencing factor

PER CURIAM:* Edwardo Perala-Salazar appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Perala-Salazar complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Perala-Salazar t

PER CURIAM:* Otoniel Salazar-Martinez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Salazar-Martinez contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one und

PER CURIAM.* Martin Valle-Salazar appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Valle-Salazar complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. Chavez contends 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional. Valle-Salazar thus con

PER CURIAM.* Cesar Salazar-Gonzalez (“Salazar”) pleaded guilty to one count of being found in the United States after deportation following conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court sentenced Salazar to 70 months’ imprisonment and three years’ supervised release. Salazar argues, for the first time on appeal, that the

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: Felipe de Jesus Salazar-Olivares appeals his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States after having previously been deported. He was sentenced to 46 months’ imprisonment and three months supervised release. Appellants’ principal complaints arise out of the district court’s condu

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1114C (Filed: May 3, 2022) FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** CORNELIO SALAZAR * D/B/A USA RANCH, * * Plaintiff, * * v.

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before MONAHAN, STEPHENS, and DEERWESTER Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Roger J. SALAZAR Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2696 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARNEZ J. SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 16, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50060 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00173- v. GW-DMG-66 MARTIN SALAZAR, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Ca

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Defendant Alex Salazar appeals his sentence for forging immigration documents. Finding no error, we affirm. I. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) received a tip that Salazar was making and selling fraudulent immigration documents. INS ag

KATHLEEN CARDONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Defendant's Motion for Discovery Sanctions, ECF No. 51. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND On March 3, 2018, Defendant entered the United States from the Republic of Mexico at the Bridge of the Americas Port

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. This litigation concerns whether the Mineral Leasing Act (“the Act” or “MLA”), as amended by the Reform Act of 1987, requires the Secretary of the Interi- or (“the Secretary”) to issue leases for parcels of land to the highest bidding energy company within sixty days of payment to the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”). Appellants (collectively “Energy Com

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE, District Judge. For the third time since 1995, the issue of the use of motorized recreational off-road vehicles (ORVs) in the Big Cypress National Preserve is before the Court. The first case2, initiated by environmental interests, resulted in a Settlement Agreement, while the second3, initiated by ORV

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 50725 ELLEN SALAZAR, ) ) Petitioner-Respondent- ) Cross Appellant, ) Twin Falls, November 2024 Term ) v. ) Opinion Filed: December 19, 2024

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 25-6214 25-6470 Plaintiff – Appellant / Cross – Appellee, D.C. No. 2:25-cr-00240- v. GMN-BNW-1 DEVONTE DEVON JACKSON, OPINION Defendant – Appellee / Cross – Appellant. UNITED STATES OF A

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion to Suppress all evidence and statements obtained *551after a traffic stop on Texas Highway 131 filed by Defendant Sammy Salazar (“Defendant”). (Dkt. # 52.) The Government filed a response. (Dkt. # 60.) On January 23, 2014, De

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PER CURIAM: * Jose Gabriel Salazar-Medina (“Salazar”) pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, and he was sentenced to a 72-month term of imprisonment and to a five-year period of supervised release. Salazar appeals the district court’s determination that his sentence should be enhanced because it found that Salazar acted as an “organizer, leader, manager, or s