Cases

ORDER Last time this case was before us, the district court had sentenced Cruz Saenz to 293 months’ imprisonment for transporting drug money, but we vacated and remanded because there was no evidentiary basis to support the district court’s denial of a minor role reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. United States v. Saenz, 623 F.3d 461, 467 (7th Cir.2010) (hereinafter “Saenz I ”). We then explained that applying t

623 F.3d 461 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cruz SAENZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-3647. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 9, 2010. Decided October 13, 2010. *462 Bradley Blackington, Melanie C. Conour (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapol

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Roque Saenz-Quintela has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Saenz-Quintela has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Saenz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Saenz has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to w

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Angela Lea Saenz has moved for leave to *301withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Saenz has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Guadalupe Saenz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Saenz has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to w

429 F.Supp.2d 1109 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Kim Darby SAENZ, Defendant. No. CR 03-4089-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. April 24, 2006. Jamie D. Bowers, U.S. Attorney's Office, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff. Joseph J. Hrvol, Council Bluffs, IA, for Defendant. *1110

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* MICHAEL W. McCONNELL, Circuit Judge. Abel Saenz, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order denying his habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Because we find that the district court abused its discretion in denying Mr. Saenz an evidentiary hearing, we reverse and remand. BACKGROUND

429 F.Supp.2d 1081 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Kim Darby SAENZ, Defendant. No. CR03-4089-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. March 23, 2006. *1082 Joseph J. Hrvol, Council Bluffs, IA, for Defendant. Jamie D. Bowers, U.S. Attorney's Office, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff.

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Antonio Saenz-Franco appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. As the district court sentenced SaenzFranco at a time when the United States Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory, and they are now discretionary, we remand to the district co

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents an issue of first impression in this circuit: whether the district court abused its discretion by denying, as time-barred, Zosimo Reyes Saenz’s motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, rather than deciding whether, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, to allow the amendment. Saenz, federal prisoner # 274

ORDER Maximino Saenz-Sigala appeals his conviction and sentence. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). Saenz-Sigala pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(

MEMORANDUM ** Ricardo Saenz-Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Saenz-Ramirez claims that the district court erred in refusing to adjust his sentence for acceptance of responsibility and in misconstruing his pro se request for a downward departure. We reject these claims and affirm.<

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Oscar Saenz appeals his jury conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 113(a)(3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291,. and because of an intervening and recent en banc decision, United States v. James, 169 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir.1999) (eri banc), unavailable to the district court at the time of its ruling, w

REVISED, March 31, 1998 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 96-40546 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BALTAZAR SAENZ, Defendant-Appell

91 F.3d 138 U.S.v.Saenz* NO. 95-11087 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. May 30, 1996 Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 2:95-CR-18-(1) 1 DISMISSED.

OPINION AND ORDER NORGLE, District Judge: Before the court is the motion of defendant Robert Saenz (“Saenz”) to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons that follow, the motion is denied. I. Facts1 In January 1991, Saenz conspired with Wilson Edward Turner

52 F.3d 1070 U.S.v.Saenz* NO. 93-4958 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Apr 05, 1995 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla., No. 92-00451-CR-FAM 2

30 F.3d 1493 U.S.v.Saenz** NO. 93-01815 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. July 21, 1994 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2