Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge This matter comes before the court on defendant Michael L. Stratton’s Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 19). Defendant asserts that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated when Sony searched information stored on his PlayStation3 gaming device and, as a result, that the court must suppress (1) evidence the National Center for Missing

519 F.3d 1305 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph James STRATTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-10080 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. March 13, 2008. William Mallory Kent, Law Office of William Mallory Kent, Jacksonville, FL, for Stratton. *1306 Karin B. Hop

MEMORANDUM ** Vadis, David, and Mark Stratton (“the Strattons”) appeal pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in this action alleging the Strattons are trespassing on National Forest System land without authorization from the United States Forest Service. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment, Rossi v. Motion Picture Ass’n of Am.

39 F.3d 1173 U.S.v.Stratton (Maurice) NO. 94-7205 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Sept 30, 1994 Appeal From: D.Del., Robinson, J. 1 AFFIRMED.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE GENE CARTER, District Judge. I. Introduction Defendant Stratton stands convicted in this Court of conspiracy to distribute hashish, and in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of three federal narcotics violations including managing a continui

915 F.2d 1578 U.S.v.Stratton (Vernon) NO. 89-5612 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. SEP 28, 1990 1 Appeal From: D.S.D. 2 AFFIRMED.

583 F.Supp. 1234 (1984) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Richard Lowell STRATTON, a/k/a "Richard Lowell," et al., Defendants. No. S 83 Cr. 482 (CBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 19, 1984. *1235 Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty., Southern District of New York by Stuart E. Abrams, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Y

751 F.2d 373 U.S.v.Stratton NO. 84-1105 United States Court of Appeals,second Circuit. JUL 30, 1984 Appeal From: S.D.N.Y., 583 F.Supp. 1234 1 AFFIRMED.

732 F.2d 139 U.S.v.Stratton 83-1322 United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. 1/27/84 1 D.Me. AFFIRMED

*999DECISION MILES, Senior Judge: Despite his pleas, the accused was convicted at a general court-martial bench trial of carnal knowledge, sodomy and uttering three worthless checks in violation of Articles 120, 125 and 184 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 925, 934. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, con

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi denied.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

*89Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

523 F.2d 1052 U. S.v.Stratton 75-1611 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 10/17/75 E.D.Pa., 392 F.Supp. 557 AFFIRMED

527 F.2d 646 U. S.v.Stratton 75-1912 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 1/19/76 1 E.D.Pa. AFFIRMED

392 F.Supp. 552 (1975) UNITED STATES of America v. Nathaniel STRATTON. Crim. No. 74-581. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. April 28, 1975. *553 Robert E. J. Curran, U. S. Atty., for the E. D. Pa., Walter S. Batty, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. Ronald B. Abrams, Philadelphia, Pa.,

544 U.S. 1042 STRATTONv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-9636. Supreme Court of United States. May 16, 2005. 1 C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John S. Stritzinger seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to reopen his ease. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.