⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. SEALED”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022-09-21 · Published · cited 16× · 49 F.4th 690
21-118 United States v. Sealed Defendant One United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2021 Submitted: May 11, 2022 Decided: September 21, 2022 No. 21-118 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018-04-10 · Published · cited 1× · 887 F.3d 707
PER CURIAM: The government appeals Appellee's sentence of 80 months of imprisonment based on a 120-month statutory minimum that applies to Appellee's conviction and the absence of a motion by the government pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (e) to depart from tha
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015-03-31 · Published · cited 24× · 781 F.3d 747; 2015 WL 1449878
FORTUNATO P. BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns a 15-year-old juvenile who has been sentenced to detention and a subsequent period of juvenile delinquent supervision in connection with a conviction for abusive sexual contact with a minor who had not attained the age of 12 years. In this appeal, we review several special conditions imposed for juvenile delinquent supe
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017-08-21 · Published · cited 37× · 868 F.3d 385; 2017 WL 3587338; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15905
XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge: On the basis of sealed probable cause affidavits, the Government obtained and executed three pre-indictment search warrants of Appellant Justin Smith’s home, business, and storage unit in March and April of 2016. Smith filed motions in the district court seeking to unseal the affidavits supporting these warrants. The Magistrate Judge initially gra
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 855 F.3d 769; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7793; 2017 WL 1623532
KANNE, Circuit Judge. Three juveniles — including M.G., who is the defendant-appellant here — and one adult allegedly robbed an Indianapolis CVS pharmacy at gunpoint on October 14, 2015. They were charged with Hobbs Act Robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), and possession of a firearm during that robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). 1
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-12-30 · Published · cited 0× · 363 F. App'x 439
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 108-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 5 kilograms or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grou
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009-12-30 · Published · cited 10× · 591 F.3d 812; 2009 WL 5067521
591 F.3d 812 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEALED APPELLANT 1; Sealed Appellant 2, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 08-30284, 08-30551. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 28, 2009. *815 Michael Edward McMahon, Stephen Andrew Higginson, Asst. U.S. Attys., New Orleans, LA, for U.S. S
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008-04-25 · Published · cited 23× · 526 F.3d 241; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9123; 2008 WL 1838321
526 F.3d 241 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEALED APPELLANT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-60477 Summary Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 25, 2008. *242 Paul David Roberts, Asst. U.S. Atty., Oxford, MS, for U.S. Bobby T. Vance, Batesville, MS, for Sealed Appellant.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006-06-14 · Published · cited 0× · 185 F. App'x 336
PER CURIAM: * Counsel on direct appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the record, and the appellant’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issues *337for appeal. Accordingly,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 255 F. App'x 254
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant appeals from his sentence of time served following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(vii), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no ground
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003-07-21 · Published · cited 0× · 70 F. App'x 774
PER CURIAM.* Gene Earl Pettaway (federal prisoner # 95088-080) moves this court for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as untimely. To obtain a COA, Pettaway must make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). *775
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000-11-01 · Published · cited 2× · 231 F.3d 484; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11687; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8783; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27216; 2000 WL 1634226
231 F.3d 484 (9th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,v.SEALED 1, LETTER OF REQUEST FOR LEGAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE DEPUTY PROSECUTOR GENERAL OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, PURSUANT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL LAW MATTERS IN THE CRIMINAL MATTER OF, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. No. 00-35347
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 180 F.3d 263; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8966
180 F.3d 263 U.S.v.Sealed* NO. 97-30933 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. April 20, 1999 Appeal From: W.D.La. , No.97-CR-60001 1 Affirmed.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999-10-07 · Published · cited 5× · 192 F.3d 488; 1999 WL 798640
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a district court’s denial of a juvenile defendant’s motion to dismiss an information filed by the government. The defendant moved to dismiss the information based on the government’s failure to bring the defendant to trial within the 30-day period set forth in the speedy trial provision of the Juvenile Delinquency Act, 18 U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000-08-24 · Published · cited 7× · 225 F.3d 507; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 21289; 2000 WL 1206028
FURGESON, District Judge: Defendant-Appellant Sealed Juvenile 1(SJ) appeals his conviction for knowingly and intentionally possessing with the intent to distribute over 100 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and § 841(a)(1)(B). SJ was found guilty in a bench trial on stipulated facts after the government submitted a need certification pursuant to the Ju
Sealed v. Sealedpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-10-04 · Published · cited 2× · 83 F.4th 399
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED October 4, 2023 No. 22-11146 Lyle W. Cayce ____________
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995-01-09 · Published · cited 0× · 46 F.3d 65; 1995 WL 29193
46 F.3d 65 U.S.v.Sealed case NO. 94-10444 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Jan 09, 1995 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 4:94-CR-006-A(1) 2 VACATED.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-02-19 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 1166; 203 L. Ed. 2d 210
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997-09-12 · Published · cited 8× · 123 F.3d 232; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 24419; 1997 WL 570351
*233 W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: In this consolidated appeal, Sealed Defendants challenge district court orders rendered pursuant to the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 5031-5042, sentencing them to terms of official detention followed by supervised release. We vacate those portion of t
Sealed v. Sealedpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-04-15 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 1593
Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.