Cases

602 F.3d 152 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellant v. Frederick S. SCHIFF. Nos. 08-1903, 08-1909. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued May 11, 2009. Opinion filed April 7, 2010. *155 Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney, Ralph J. Marra, Jr., Acting United States Attorney, George S. Leone,

538 F.Supp.2d 818 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Frederick SCHIFF, Defendant. Crim. No. 06-406 (FSH). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 19, 2008. *824 David M. Zornow, Lawrence Spiegel, Steven R. Glaser, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant. George Stanley Leone,

MEMORANDUM ** Irwin A. Schiff appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the government in its action seeking to reduce to judgment income tax, penalty, and interest assessments for tax years 1979-1985. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Hansen v. United States, 7 F.3d 137, 138 (9th Cir.1993) (per curiam), and we affirm.

MEMORANDUM *** Irwin A. Schiff appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the government in its action seeking to reduce to judgment income tax, penalty, and interest assessments for tax years 1979- 1985. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Hansen v. United States, 7 F.3d 137, 138 (9th Cir.1993) (per curiam), and we affirm.

MEMORANDUM *** Irwin A. Schiff appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the government in its action seeking to reduce to judgment income tax, penalty, and interest assessments for tax years 1979- 1985. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Hansen v. United States, 7 F.3d 137, 138 (9th Cir.1993) (per curiam), and we affirm.

379 F.3d 621 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Irwin A. SCHIFF; Cynthia Neun; Lawrence N. Cohen, aka Larry D.C. No. Cohen, individually, and all doing business as Freedom Books, www.livetaxfree.com, www.paynoincometax.com and www.ischiff.com, Defendants-Appellants. No. 03-16319. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February

HUG, Circuit Judge: Appellants Irwin Schiff, Lawrence Cohen, and Cynthia Nuen contest the constitutionality of a preliminary injunction entered by the District of Nevada enjoining them from promoting their “zero-income” tax theories. Specifically they argue (1) that the injunction is overbroad as it relates to a book they sell, The Federal Mafia, (2) that the requirement that they give the government their customer

269 F.Supp.2d 1262 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Irwin SCHIFF, Cynthia Neun, Lawrence N. Cohen aka Larry Cohen, individually and doing business as Freedom Books, www.livetaxfree.com, www.paynoincometax.com, and www.ischiff.com, Defendants. No. CV-S-03-0281-LDG RJJ. United States District Court, D. Nevada. June 16, 2003.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 649.

OMNIBUS ORDER K. MICHAEL MOORE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants Allergy, Dermatology & Skin Cancer Center, Inc. (“ADSCC”) and Gary Marder, D.O.’s (“Dr. Marder”) (collectively, the “Marder Defendants”) Motion for Continuance of Trial Date (ECF No. 230) and the Marder Defendants’ Notice of Supplemental Authority (ECF No. 236) and Defendants Robert I. K

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

647 F.2d 163 U. S.v.Schiff 80-1297 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit 1/28/81 1 D.Conn. 2 AFFIRMED*

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Case below, 528 Fed.Appx. 743.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

ORDER REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge. On September 19, 1991, this court’s opinion granted defendant’s RUSCC 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss plaintiff's tax refund complaint for want of jurisdiction.1 Concomitantly therewith, we denied defendant’s motion for a RUSCC 11 sanction on the authority of Johns-Manville Corp. v. United States, 893 F.2d 324, 326-327 (Fed. Cir.1989); and

OPINION REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge: In this tax refund case, plaintiff, Irwin A. Schiff, seeks a refund of $18,260.34 for income taxes, penalties, and interest assessed for the 1974 taxable year allegedly in violation of the due process and taxing clauses of the Constitution, several sections of the 1954 Internal Revenue Code (IRC), and various Treasury Department regulations. The United States, acting thr

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

SNEED, Circuit Judge: Schiff appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion to dismiss the indictment and motion for disclosure of grand jury transcripts. We dismiss the appeal. I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW This appeal is a result of a Justice Department investigation of the Synanon Church.