Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. SCANTLIN”
Spurgeon v. SCANTLINpublic domain
502 F.Supp.2d 1021 (2007) Patrick C. SPURGEON, Plaintiff, v. Wesley R. SCANTLIN, Defendant. No. 06-0422-CV-W-HFS. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division. June 11, 2007. *1022 Robert B. Evans, III, Burgos & Evans, LLC, New Orleans, LA, Sean T. Bradley, Erickson & Kleypas, LLC, Kansas City, MO, for Pl
Johnny Francis Scantlin v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 3, 2007 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 3, 2007. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Archer v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION RADER, Judge. Plaintiffs, twenty individual employees of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (Bureau), Department of the Treasury *604(Treasury), originally brought this action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia through their union, the Bank Note Engravers Guild. Plaintiffs claimed that the Bureau unreasonably
United States v. Harperpublic domain
514 F.3d 456 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Gene HARPER; Jimmie Clyde Collins, Defendants-Appellants. No. 05-10247. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 17, 2008. *457 *458 *459 Renee Harris Toliver (argued)
Scantlin v. Allisonpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by Valentine, J.: George Allison in his lifetime executed a will devising and bequeathing all his real and personal property to his five children, in equal shares. He also willed that said property should be sold whenever a majority of his heirs desired the same to be done. But as to how it should be sold, or who should sell it, or who should receive, take charge of, or dist
Scantlin v. Garvinpublic domain
Downey, J. This was an action by the appellants against the appellees, to recover certain real estate, being a part of what was the original public square as laid off in Evansville. The action was commenced in the Vanderburgh Circuit Court, but by change of venue was tried in the Posey Circuit Court. The defendants filed an answer consisting of a single special paragraph, in which they set forth their title at length. The plainti
ORDER PRO, District Judge. On November 24, 1987, Plaintiff, United States of America, for the use of Las Vegas Building Materials, Inc., a Nevada corporation, filed a Complaint (# 1) to recover the sum of $20,682.00 due and owing for concrete supplied by Plaintiff to Defendant. On January 27,1989, Defendants George Bernadot, individually, George Bernadot dba George Bemadot Construction
322 F.3d 1133 Arleen FREEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; James Alexander, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, andEdward Y. Urata, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,v.SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS; North San Diego County Association of Realtors; Pacific Southwest Association of Realtors, Inc.; East San Diego County A
Hargreaves v. United Statespublic domain
75 F.2d 68 (1935) HARGREAVES v. UNITED STATES.[*] No. 7593. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. January 21, 1935. *69 Wm. H. Neblett, H. H. MacDonald, and Harry W. Dudley, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Peirson M. Hall, U. S. Atty., and Robert W. Daniels, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Ca
Dunn v. United Insurance Co. of Americapublic domain
OPINION DEL SOLE, Judge: Joseph V. Dunn, Jr., prior to the time of his death, was employed by the Defendant, United Insurance Company of America (hereinafter “United”). On June 23, 1979, he sustained a heart attack from which he was recovering. On September 28, 1979, United, acting through either or both Harry Fleisher and William Formwalt, co-employees, contacted Mr. Dunn at his home and advised him that hi
Rainsdon v. Farson (In Re Farson)public domain
387 B.R. 784 (2008) In re Judith M.K. FARSON, Debtor. Gary L. Rainsdon, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Judith M.K, Farson and David L. Scantlin, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 05-41966-JDP. Adversary No. 07-8077. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho. April 3, 2008. *787 William R. Hollifield, Hepworth & Associates, Twin Falls, ID
Grabowski, M. v. Carelink Communitypublic domain
J-A04044-20 2020 PA Super 56 MICHELLE GRABOWSKI : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : :
Grabowski, M. v. Carelink Communitypublic domain
J-A04044-20 2020 PA Super 56 MICHELLE GRABOWSKI : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellant : : : v. : :
Mapp v. UMG Recordings, Inc.public domain
I. Factual Background1 Plaintiff is a record producer, singer, and songwriter residing in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. (Doc. 51 at 2). Defendant is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in California that is engaged in the business of manufacturing, distributing, and selling records in various mediums and formats. (Id. at 2). Tyga Music, LLC ("Tyga Musi
Donna Zink & Jeff Zink v. City of Mesapublic domain
FILED JUNE 1, 2021 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE DONNA ZINK and JEFF ZINK, wife )
MARZIALE v. BROWNpublic domain
Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 468 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CV-22-679 CHRISTINA MARZIALE, Opinion Delivered October 8, 2025 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS MOTHER OF APPEAL FROM THE JEFFERSON BABY BOY MARZIALE; AND DANA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT MCLAIN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter concerns a dispute over an insurance contract. A court trial was held commencing on October 18, 2016 and "concluding on October 27, 2016. For the reasons explained below, the court finds plaintiff has not met its burden of proof and therefore finds in favor of defendant and will direct that judgment be entered
My Thi Tieu v. Statepublic domain
*218SUBSTITUTE MAJORITY OPINION WILLIAM J. BOYCE, Justice. Appellant My Thi Tieu filed a petition for discretionary review. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 50, we withdraw our opinion of July 80, 2009, and issue this substitute opinion in its place. Appellant challenges the effectiveness of her trial counsel in connect
Prendiville v. Contemporary Homes, Inc.public domain
32 Kan.App. 2d 435 (2004) 83 P.3d 1257 DAN PRENDIVILLE, Appellant, v. CONTEMPORARY HOMES, INC., et al., Appellees. No. 88,395 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed February 13, 2004. Paul M. Dent, of Kansas City, for appellant. Heather A. Jones and James A. Durbin, of Swanson Midgley, LLC, of Kansas City, Misso
Finke v. Hunter's View, Ltd.public domain
596 F.Supp.2d 1254 (2009) D.J. (Darus) FINKE and Shea Finke, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. HUNTER'S VIEW, LTD. and Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated, Defendants. Civil File No. 07-4267 (MJD/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. February 3, 2009. *1257 Blake W. Duerre, Mark S. Brown, Paul E.D. Darsow, and Christopher D.