Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “United States v. SALAMAK”
Lowman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewpublic domain
CONCURRING & DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE McCULLOUGH Although I concur in the result reached, by the thoughtful Majority, I must re.-: spectfully depart from its reasoning and application of precedent in unemployment-compensation law. Based on this record, we are compelled to apply the standard test as developed and endorsed by our Supre
21 A.3d 1209 (2011) 2011 PA Super 91 ToDAY'S HOUSING, Appellant, v. TIMES SHAMROCK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., and Times Shamrock Communications, Inc., d/b/a/ Republican & Herald, and Pottsville Republican, Inc., and Pottsville Republican, Inc. d/b/a/ Republican & Herald, Appellee. No. 20 MDA 2010. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 8, 201
COLINS, President Judge. Richard Campbell (claimant) petitions for review of the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) finding him ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law)1 (relating to willful misconduct). We affirm. In the Montgomery County area, a particularly chilli
Rossi v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewpublic domain
KELTON, Senior Judge. Claimant John D. Rossi petitions for review of the October 5, 1995 order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), which affirmed the Referee’s denial of unemployment compensation benefits. Issues The issues before us for review are: (1) whether the Board erred as a matter of law in concluding that Claimant was self-employed and therefore ineligibl
Platz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewpublic domain
709 A.2d 450 (1998) Rose PLATZ, Petitioner, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs January 30, 1998. Decided March 27, 1998. *451 Andrew M. Hladio, Ambridge, for petitioner. Judith M. Gilroy, Assistant Counsel, and Clifford F. Blaze, Deputy Chief Co
DOYLE, Judge. Before this Court are the consolidated appeals of the Department of Transportation (DOT) and Anjo Construction Company from an order of the Board of Claims (Board) awarding Anjo $2,116,368.14 in damages plus 6% interest on a construction contract claim. On July 11, 1986, DOT contracted with Anjo to rehabilitate the Highland Park Bridge located in the Pittsburgh area. The bridge is the second bu