⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Rumaner”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987-05-14 · Published · cited 0× · 818 F.2d 870
818 F.2d 870 U.S.v.Rumaner 86-1172 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 5/14/87 1 D.Ariz. AFFIRMED
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2003-01-07 · Published · cited 0× · 308 F. Supp. 2d 902; 93 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 771; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24567; 2003 WL 23316942
308 F.Supp.2d 902 (2003) Nick KIKALOS and Helen Kikalos, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 2:98 CV 618. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. January 7, 2003. *903 Donald E. Schlyer, Roger A. Weitgenant, David Ronald Novak, Schlyer & Associates PC, Elizabeth A. Deremiah, Ruman Cle
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2003-01-12 · Published · cited 2× · 313 F. Supp. 2d 876; 2003 WL 23374570
313 F.Supp.2d 876 (2003) Nick KIKALOS and Helen Kikalos, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 2:98 CV 618. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. January 12, 2003. Donald E Schlyer, Schlyer & Associates PC, Elizabeth A Deremiah, Ruman Clements Tobin and Holub PC, Roger A Weitgenant, David Ronald Novak, Schlyer & Asso
United States Court of Military Commission Review · 2011-06-24 · Published · cited 3× · 801 F. Supp. 2d 1247; 2011 U.S. CMCR LEXIS 1; 2011 WL 2923945
801 F.Supp.2d 1247 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Salim Ahmed HAMDAN. CMCR 09-002. United States Court of Military Commission Review. June 24, 2011. *1253 Joseph M. McMillan argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Harry H. Schneider, Jr., Charles C. Sipos, Adam Thurschwell, and Captain Michael G. Thieme, U
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007-07-16 · Published · cited 4× · 523 F. Supp. 2d 759; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51141; 2007 WL 2075632
523 F.Supp.2d 759 (2007) Innocent Likonga KASONGO, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Jacqueline Makombe, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 04 C 4901. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 16, 2007. *760 *761
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984-09-18 · Published · cited 0× · 592 F. Supp. 1287; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23515
ORDER MOODY, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by the defendants on November 16, 1983. The motion seeks dismissal of this action under, alternatively, Rule 12(b)(1), for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, or under Rule 12(b)(6), for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, or under Rule 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Beca
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968-04-01 · Published · cited 17× · 392 F.2d 885
MAJOR, Senior Circuit Judge. This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Fortunato Rivera Echevarria, an infant, resulting from defendant’s alleged negligence, and for medical expense and loss of services to his father, Jose Rivera Echevarria. The case was tried to a jury which returned verdicts fav
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 153 A.D. 885; 137 N.Y.S. 1057
Per Curiam: This case differs, from the case of People ex rel. Ruman v. Nat. Slavonic Society (144 App. Div. 574), in that it appears in this case that the parent society, a' membership corporation organized finder the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, has been authorized to do business in this State. But it is none the less a foreign corporation. The relator is a non-resident, and the subordinate lodge from wh
Huq v. Gonzalespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-12-12 · Published · cited 0× · 210 F. App'x 737
MEMORANDUM ** Manzurul Huq, his wife and two children (“Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Bangladesh, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their second motion to reopen deportation proceedings so as to renew their applications for asylum, withholding of deportation, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) in light of changed country conditi
Bottos v. Rumanpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1977-11-07 · Published · cited 0× · 434 U.S. 942; 98 S. Ct. 437
Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.
Crumpacker v. Rumanpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1977-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 431 U.S. 904; 97 S. Ct. 1696
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1980-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 446 U.S. 964; 100 S. Ct. 2939
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Ferraro v. Humphreypublic domain
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2017-03-17 · Published · cited 0× · 242 F. Supp. 3d 732; 2017 WL 1035896; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38599
OPINION AND ORDER THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, CHIEF JUDGE This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. *73624] filed by American National Services Corporation (“ANSC”), Masco Corporation, and Old Republic Insurance Company (the “Masco Defendants”); a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 27] filed by Plaintiff Peter Fer
Crumpacker v. Rumanpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1977-06-13 · Published · cited 0× · 431 U.S. 962; 97 S. Ct. 2917
Motion of respondents to assess damages denied.
Zaza v. Ashcroftpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-09-07 · Published · cited 0× · 106 F. App'x 640
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge, Dissenting. I believe that when the Muslim Brotherhood’s threats that Ms. Ruman “should pay a price” and “should be taught a lesson” are understood in the larger context in which they were made, it becomes clear that she — and her three young daughters — face a likelihood of persecution if forced to return to Jordan. These threats come from a group that “teaches” women lessons by thr
Padula v. Leimbachpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 740 F. Supp. 2d 980; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96125; 2010 WL 3715637
740 F.Supp.2d 980 (2010) William PADULA, Administrator of the Estate of Jerome Clement, Plaintiff, v. Timothy LEIMBACH, Jesus Arceo, N. London Officer # 136, M. Harretos, Officer # 127, City of East Chicago, East Chicago Police Department, Angelo Machuca, Jr., Chief, Defendants. Cause No.: 2:07-CV-35 JVB. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division. September 1
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009-09-04 · Published · cited 11× · 581 F.3d 480; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19961; 2009 WL 2835426
581 F.3d 480 (2009) Lela CICIORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CCAA, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Burrito Jalisco and Bridgeview Bank Group, Trust 13137, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-1099. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 13, 2009. Decided September 4, 2009. *481 Steven J. Sersic (argued), Kevin
Reiner v. Dandurandpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014-07-16 · Published · cited 55× · 33 F. Supp. 3d 1018; 2014 WL 3519062; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96453
OPINION AND ORDER PAUL R. CHERRY, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [DE 6], filed on October 18, 2013. I. Procedural Background On August 29, 2013, Plaintiffs James E. Reiner and Dana Reiner filed an eleven-count Complaint against Defendants Anthony Dandurand, Travis Thomas, and th
Padula v. Leimbachpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011-08-29 · Published · cited 125× · 656 F.3d 595; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17996; 2011 WL 3796265
656 F.3d 595 (2011) William PADULA, Administrator of the Estate of Jerome Clement, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy LEIMBACH, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-3395. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued May 4, 2011. Decided August 29, 2011. *597 Michael E. Polen, Jr., Adam John Sedia (argued)
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014-06-25 · Published · cited 1× · 12 N.E.3d 285; 2014 WL 2880773; 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 280
OPINION NAJAM, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Lloyd J. Diehl appeals the trial court’s order granting Larry J. Clemons’ motion to correct error, following a jury trial, and ordering a new trial on the question of damages owed by Diehl to Clemons. Diehl raises three issues for our review, which we restate as the following two issues