⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Ruiz-Caceres”

District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001-11-14 · Published · cited 1× · 175 F. Supp. 2d 129; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19316; 2001 WL 1481441
175 F.Supp.2d 129 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. [05] Martires Paulino CASTRO, [08] Esteban Martinez García, [23] Carlos Valdes, Defendants Criminal No. 00-0693(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 14, 2001. *130 Miriam R. Ramos-Grateroles, San Juan, for Rafael Reynoso-De-La-Cruz. Marl
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 355 F. Supp. 3d 554
Andrew S. Hanen, United States District Court Judge Omar Hernandez Lozano ("Hernandez Lozano") and Juan Gabriel Ruiz-Baena ("Ruiz-Baena") are charged with illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and § 1326(a) respectively. They seek to have their indictments dismissed because the
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 0× · 356 F. Supp. 3d 619
DAVID C. GUADERRAMA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant Luis Roberto Arroyo's ("Defendant") "Motion to Dismiss" (ECF No. 26). Defendant, a citizen of Mexico, was indicated on one count of illegal reentry after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Defendant moves to dismiss the Indictment
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-05-15 · Published · cited 0× · 312 F. Supp. 3d 60
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge On May 17, 2017, the Acting Attorney General of the United States appointed Robert S. Mueller III to serve as Special Counsel for the U.S. Department of Justice.1 Paragraph (b) of the Appointment Order authorized him "to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intel
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-05-16 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. Action No. 17-0201-01 (ABJ) ) PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., ) ) Defendant.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-05-15 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. Action No. 17-0201-01 (ABJ) ) PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., ) ) Defendant.
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 383 F. Supp. 3d 707
Andrew S. Hanen, United States District Judge *708Juan Angel Porras-Avila ("Porras-Avila" or "Defendant") is charged with illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). He seeks to have his indictment dismissed bec
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-06-21 · Published · cited 19× · 826 F.3d 1265; 100 Fed. R. Serv. 831; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11207; 2016 WL 3407626
McHUGH, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Appellant Ivan Bennett Willis was charged with aggravated sexual abuse committed in Indian country. Mr. Willis admitted he had sex with a seventeen-year-old acquaintance, K.M., and that the events occurred in Indian country. But Mr. .Willis maintained that K.M. consented to the encounter. Thus, the only issue at
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016-01-14 · Published · cited 5× · 157 F. Supp. 3d 80; 2016 WL 183651
OPINION AND ORDER PEDRO A. DELGADO-HERNÁNDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Mario Lebrón-Caceres was indicted for coercion and enticement of an individual to engage in a sexual activity, and with interstate extortion as proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a) and § 875(d) (Docket No. 10). Before the court is Lebrón’s “Motion to Dismiss Count One of the Indictment” (Docket No. 24), which the government opposed (Dock
District Court, D. Utah · 2013-08-15 · Published · cited 4× · 966 F. Supp. 2d 1207; 2013 WL 4434215; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116442
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPRESS CLARK WADDOUPS, District Judge. Defendant filed his Motion to Suppress (Dkt. No. 258) on April 13, 2012. The court heard three days of evidence on the Motion to Suppress on November 8, 14, and 28, 2012, and oral argument on April 18, 2013. The parties filed lengthy post-hearing briefs on the Motion to Suppr
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011-03-03 · Published · cited 51× · 14 A.3d 1094; 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 108; 2011 WL 721540
FISHER, Associate Judge, dissenting: When analyzing appellant’s claim that the government violated its obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), it is important to keep two points firmly in mind. First, appellant does not deny that the videotape itself was disclosed in a timely fashion; he concedes that defense counsel “had received from the government,
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007-10-11 · Published · cited 0× · 516 F. Supp. 2d 971; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75522; 2007 WL 2948559
516 F.Supp.2d 971 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lisa Leann NEWELL; University of Iowa Community Credit Union a/k/a U of I Community Credit Union; and City of North Liberty, Iowa, Defendants. No. 3:06-cv-00100. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Davenport Division. October 11, 2007. *972 Gary L. Hayward, Uni
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2026-07-23 · Published · cited 0×
This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Danielle E. Deremer, Private First Class United States Marine Corps, Appellee No. 25-0158 Crim. App. No. 202300205 Argued January 28, 2026—July 23, 2026 Military Judge: Benjamin A. Roble
United States Court of International Trade · 2003-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 2003 CIT 93; 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 1070
OPINION RlDGWAY, Judge: The United States (“Government”) has moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction this action in which pro se plaintiff Daniel Atteberry contests the decision of the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) 1 re
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002-04-29 · Published · cited 0× · 39 F. App'x 574
*575MEMORANDUM * Martin and Nanja Rutherford (“the Rutherfords”) appeal their convictions by a jury for making and filing false income tax returns for 1992, and for failing to file income tax returns for 1993. Specifically, they argue that the district court erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence, in denying their Rule 29 motions for judg
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002-06-27 · Published · cited 2× · 230 F. Supp. 2d 138; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20227; 2002 WL 31387531
230 F.Supp.2d 138 (2002) UNITED STATES, v. Luis Angel FLORES, Victor Laboy, Edgardo Colon, Wilberto Colon, Antonio Santiago, Roberto Pagan, and John Doe, Defendants. No. CR. 1:00CR10029-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 27, 2002. William F. Sinnott, United States Attorney's Office, John A. Wortmann, Jr., *139
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001-06-05 · Published · cited 1× · 152 F. Supp. 2d 137; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8536; 2001 WL 709209
152 F.Supp.2d 137 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Luis GINES PEREZ and Ricardo Melendez Perez, Defendants. No. CRIM 98-164 DRD. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 5, 2001. *138 Edwin O. Vazquez-Berrios, U.S. Attorney's Office District of P.R., Criminal Division, Hato Rey, PR, for plaintiff. J
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000-08-21 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 99-2721 & 99-2874 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUAN CHAPARRO-ALCANTARA and JAIME ROMERO-BAUTISTA, Defendants-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. No. 98 CR 30070--Jeanne E. Scott, Judge. Argued December 7, 1999--Decided August 21, 2000 Before HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., RIPPLE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Juan
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996-04-18 · Published · cited 15× · 675 A.2d 474; 1996 D.C. App. LEXIS 67; 1996 WL 189795
675 A.2d 474 (1996) Andrew C. HOLT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 95-CF-17. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued March 7, 1996. Decided April 18, 1996. *476 Robert C. Bonsib, Gaithersburg, for appellant. Magdalena A. Bell, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Eric H. Holder, Jr
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999-04-19 · Published · cited 7× · 173 F.3d 323; 1999 CCH OSHD 31,814; 18 OSHC (BNA) 1685; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7533; 1999 WL 225205
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Cargill, Incorporated, General Chemical Corporation, Mississippi Lime Management Company, Morton International, OCI of Wyoming, Lonny Badeaux, Joseph Vendetti, the Methane Awareness Resource Group, and the Diesel Coalition, which we refer to collectively as “MARG,” 1 appeal the denial of injunctive and declaratory relief from alleged violations of the Fed