Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Ruiz-Caceres”
United States v. Castropublic domain
175 F.Supp.2d 129 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. [05] Martires Paulino CASTRO, [08] Esteban Martinez García, [23] Carlos Valdes, Defendants Criminal No. 00-0693(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 14, 2001. *130 Miriam R. Ramos-Grateroles, San Juan, for Rafael Reynoso-De-La-Cruz. Marl
United States v. Lozanopublic domain
Andrew S. Hanen, United States District Court Judge Omar Hernandez Lozano ("Hernandez Lozano") and Juan Gabriel Ruiz-Baena ("Ruiz-Baena") are charged with illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and § 1326(a) respectively. They seek to have their indictments dismissed because the
United States v. Arroyopublic domain
DAVID C. GUADERRAMA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant Luis Roberto Arroyo's ("Defendant") "Motion to Dismiss" (ECF No. 26). Defendant, a citizen of Mexico, was indicated on one count of illegal reentry after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Defendant moves to dismiss the Indictment
United States v. Manafortpublic domain
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge On May 17, 2017, the Acting Attorney General of the United States appointed Robert S. Mueller III to serve as Special Counsel for the U.S. Department of Justice.1 Paragraph (b) of the Appointment Order authorized him "to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intel
United States v. Manafortpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. Action No. 17-0201-01 (ABJ) ) PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., ) ) Defendant.
United States v. Manafortpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. Action No. 17-0201-01 (ABJ) ) PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., ) ) Defendant.
United States v. Porras-Avilapublic domain
Andrew S. Hanen, United States District Judge *708Juan Angel Porras-Avila ("Porras-Avila" or "Defendant") is charged with illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). He seeks to have his indictment dismissed bec
United States v. Willispublic domain
McHUGH, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Appellant Ivan Bennett Willis was charged with aggravated sexual abuse committed in Indian country. Mr. Willis admitted he had sex with a seventeen-year-old acquaintance, K.M., and that the events occurred in Indian country. But Mr. .Willis maintained that K.M. consented to the encounter. Thus, the only issue at
United States v. Lebrón-Cacerespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER PEDRO A. DELGADO-HERNÁNDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Mario Lebrón-Caceres was indicted for coercion and enticement of an individual to engage in a sexual activity, and with interstate extortion as proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a) and § 875(d) (Docket No. 10). Before the court is Lebrón’s “Motion to Dismiss Count One of the Indictment” (Docket No. 24), which the government opposed (Dock
United States v. Koerberpublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPRESS CLARK WADDOUPS, District Judge. Defendant filed his Motion to Suppress (Dkt. No. 258) on April 13, 2012. The court heard three days of evidence on the Motion to Suppress on November 8, 14, and 28, 2012, and oral argument on April 18, 2013. The parties filed lengthy post-hearing briefs on the Motion to Suppr
Miller v. United Statespublic domain
FISHER, Associate Judge, dissenting: When analyzing appellant’s claim that the government violated its obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), it is important to keep two points firmly in mind. First, appellant does not deny that the videotape itself was disclosed in a timely fashion; he concedes that defense counsel “had received from the government,
United States v. Newellpublic domain
516 F.Supp.2d 971 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lisa Leann NEWELL; University of Iowa Community Credit Union a/k/a U of I Community Credit Union; and City of North Liberty, Iowa, Defendants. No. 3:06-cv-00100. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Davenport Division. October 11, 2007. *972 Gary L. Hayward, Uni
United States v. Deremerpublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Danielle E. Deremer, Private First Class United States Marine Corps, Appellee No. 25-0158 Crim. App. No. 202300205 Argued January 28, 2026—July 23, 2026 Military Judge: Benjamin A. Roble
Atteberry v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION RlDGWAY, Judge: The United States (“Government”) has moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction this action in which pro se plaintiff Daniel Atteberry contests the decision of the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) 1 re
United States v. Rutherfordpublic domain
*575MEMORANDUM * Martin and Nanja Rutherford (“the Rutherfords”) appeal their convictions by a jury for making and filing false income tax returns for 1992, and for failing to file income tax returns for 1993. Specifically, they argue that the district court erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence, in denying their Rule 29 motions for judg
United States v. Florespublic domain
230 F.Supp.2d 138 (2002) UNITED STATES, v. Luis Angel FLORES, Victor Laboy, Edgardo Colon, Wilberto Colon, Antonio Santiago, Roberto Pagan, and John Doe, Defendants. No. CR. 1:00CR10029-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 27, 2002. William F. Sinnott, United States Attorney's Office, John A. Wortmann, Jr., *139
United States v. Gines Perezpublic domain
152 F.Supp.2d 137 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Luis GINES PEREZ and Ricardo Melendez Perez, Defendants. No. CRIM 98-164 DRD. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 5, 2001. *138 Edwin O. Vazquez-Berrios, U.S. Attorney's Office District of P.R., Criminal Division, Hato Rey, PR, for plaintiff. J
United States v. Chaparro-Alcantarapublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 99-2721 & 99-2874 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUAN CHAPARRO-ALCANTARA and JAIME ROMERO-BAUTISTA, Defendants-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois. No. 98 CR 30070--Jeanne E. Scott, Judge. Argued December 7, 1999--Decided August 21, 2000 Before HARLINGTON WOOD, JR., RIPPLE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Juan
Holt v. United Statespublic domain
675 A.2d 474 (1996) Andrew C. HOLT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 95-CF-17. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued March 7, 1996. Decided April 18, 1996. *476 Robert C. Bonsib, Gaithersburg, for appellant. Magdalena A. Bell, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Eric H. Holder, Jr
Cargill, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Cargill, Incorporated, General Chemical Corporation, Mississippi Lime Management Company, Morton International, OCI of Wyoming, Lonny Badeaux, Joseph Vendetti, the Methane Awareness Resource Group, and the Diesel Coalition, which we refer to collectively as “MARG,” 1 appeal the denial of injunctive and declaratory relief from alleged violations of the Fed