Cases

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Dominic L. RUIZ, Corporal United States Marine Corps, Appellant No. 24-0158 Crim. App. No. 202300007 Argued March 18, 2025—Decided August 8, 2025 Military Judges: Adam M. King (arraignme

Appellate Case: 23-3172 Document: 48-1 Date Filed: 01/14/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH January 14, 2025

Appellate Case: 23-2027 Document: 83-1 Date Filed: 09/16/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 16, 2024

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1156 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. MINERVA RUIZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1937 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. HIRAM JOSÉ RUIZ-VALLE, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Jay A. García-Gregory, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1937 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. HIRAM JOSÉ RUIZ-VALLE, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Jay A. García-Gregory, U.S. District Judge]

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-386 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-01331- GPC-1 v. ALEX RUIZ, AMENDED

Appellate Case: 24-2128 Document: 51-1 Date Filed: 01/12/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 12, 2026

Appellate Case: 24-2128 Document: 59 Date Filed: 01/28/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 28, 2026

Appellate Case: 24-2128 Document: 77 Date Filed: 05/05/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 5, 2026

Appellate Case: 24-2128 Document: 58-1 Date Filed: 01/28/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 28, 2026

Appellate Case: 24-2128 Document: 59-1 Date Filed: 01/28/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS January 28, 2026

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-386 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-01331- GPC-1 v. ALEX RUIZ, OPINION Defendant -

MEMORANDUM ** Thomas Romero Ruiz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial convictions and 56-month concurrent sentences for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600424 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. MATTHEW A. RUIZ Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ruben Ruiz-Gaona has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ruiz-Gaona has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Ruiz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ruiz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

Before DIAZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Unpublished opinions are not binding ■ precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Hector Edgardo Ruiz-Zunigo appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion to reduce his sentence under Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af

ORDER Neil V. Wake, Senior United States District Judge Defendant Maria Magdalena Ruiz-Cela-ya has filed a Motion for Reconsideration and Offer of Proof urging the Court to allow her to present a duress defense at trial. (Docs. 105 and 113.) The Court now considers this motion, the government’s response (Doc. 114), and Ruiz-Celaya’s reply (Doc. 118). I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Gustavo Ruiz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ruiz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief *295<