Cases

24 F.Supp.2d 1133 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Julian SANCHEZ-RUEDA, Defendant. No. 97-10143. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 8, 1998. *1134 Michael G. Christensen, Office of U.S. Attorney, Wichita, KS, for Plaintiff. Cyd K. Gilman, Office of Federal Public Defender, Wichita, KS, for Defend

MOORE, Circuit Judge: The United States appeals from an order entered in the Southern District of New York, dated August 31, 1976, granting the motion of defendant Elíseo Sanchez Rueda to suppress evidence, namely, a matchbook, obtained in a search incident to his arrest. The court found that no probable cause existed for the arrest of Sanchez Rueda when he was apprehended in a

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Julio Sanchez-Ruedas was convicted of illegally reentering the United States after having been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He appeals his sentence, *411 including the application of a sixteen-level crime-of-violence enhancement and the denial of a two-level aec

(Reported below: 45 Fed. Appx. 322); (45 Fed. Appx. 322); (45 Fed. Appx. 322); (45 Fed. Appx. 322); (45 Fed. Appx. 321); (45 Fed. Appx. 321); (45 Fed. Appx. 321); (45 Fed. Appx. 322); (45 Fed. Appx. 322); (45 Fed. Appx. 321); (45 Fed. Appx. 322). C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Case: 24-50075 Document: 112-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/08/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-50075 FILED

*939(Reported below: 10 Fed. Appx. 608); *940(13 Fed. Appx. 541); (20 Fed. Appx. 609); C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1292THIS MATTER is before the Court on Ollisha Nicole Easley's Motion to Suppress. [Doc. 20]. Having reviewed the Motion, briefs, testimony, and relevant law, for the reasons below, the Court grants the Motion. BACKGROUND This Mo

*586GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The strong interest in uniform application of the law means that we should usually follow unpublished decisions. But the difference between published and unpublished decisions must mean something. Otherwise, we should just “publish” everything and give all opinions the weight of binding authority.1

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANDREW S. HANEN, District Judge. The Court is faced with Defendant’s objection to the Pre-sentence Investigation Report (“PSR”) prepared by the United States Probation Office. The PSR, as filed with the Court, included a sixteen-point sentencing enhancement to the level eight base offense pursuant to United States Sentencing Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). The basis of

EDWARD C. PRADO, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Gerardo Hernandez-Rodriguez appeals the district court’s application of a sixteen-level “crime of violence” sentencing enhancement based on his prior Louisiana aggravated battery conviction. Addressing the question we left open in United States v. Herrera-Alvarez, 753 F.3d 132, 142 n. 5 (5th Cir.2014), we conc

GRAVES, Circuit Judge, concurring: I agree that Rodriguez’s challenge based on the definition of “minor” is foreclosed by this court’s earlier decisions holding that Texas Penal Code § 22.011(a)(2) constitutes both “statutory rape” and “sexual abuse of a minor” for the purposes of the § 2L1.2 sentencing enhancement. I write separately to emphasize that these decisions are unsupported by the proper analysis an

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Jose Alfredo Sanchez-Sanehez appeals his sentence and challenges the district court’s application of an enhancement based on a prior Texas conviction for a crime of violence. We are asked to determine whether the district court was pre- *303 eluded from relyin

598 F.3d 227 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronnie WILLIAMSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-10079. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 2, 2010. *228 James Wesley Hendrix, Asst. U.S. Atty., Dallas, TX, for U.S. Christopher Allen Curtis, Fed. Pub. Def., Fort Worth, TX, for Williamson.

MEMORANDUM ** Rafael Balderas, a citizen of Mexico, appeals his jury conviction and sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We affirm. We affirm the district court’s decision to deny the motion to dismiss § 1326 indictment. The Immigration Judge failed to make a voluntar

MEMORANDUM ** Rafael Balderas, a citizen of Mexico, appeals his jury conviction and sentence for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We affirm. We affirm the district court’s decision to deny the motion to dismiss § 1326 indictment. The Immigration Judge failed to make a voluntar

557 F.3d 200 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francis Javier RAMIREZ, also known as Javier Antonio Ramirez, also known as Javier Antonio Ramirez-Cermeno, also known as Javier Mario Lopez, also known as Pelon, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-40442. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 28, 2009. *202</

641 F.3d 667 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio Adalberto FLORES-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-40312. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. May 23, 2011. *669 Stuart Douglas Alcorn (argued), Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Brownsville, TX, Mary Jane Harmon, James

PER CURIAM: This is a direct appeal from a felony conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 1326(b). Appellant challenges only his sentence, arguing that his prior New Jersey conviction for third degree aggravated assault does not constitute a crime of violence under the sentencing guidelines. U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). We agree an

632 F.3d 192 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Guadalupe HERNANDEZ-GALVAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-40872. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 31, 2011. *195 Lauretta Drake Bahry (argued), James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, TX, for U.S. Kimberly S. Keller (argued)