Cases

PER CURIAM: Lloyd Mack Royal, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the dist

MEMORANDUM ** Dana Tyrone Royal (“Royal”) appeals his jury conviction for conspiracy to commit bank fraud pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1344 and for depositing counterfeit securities pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 513. Royal contends that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand for a new trial. On

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. After prevailing, in a previous appeal to this court, on his motion to inspect the jury selection records of the Eastern Division of the District of Massachusetts, Jerome E. Royal moved for a new trial, claiming that the selection process used to pick the jury panel that convicted him of conspiracy and mail fraud violated the Sixth Amendment and the Jury Sele

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 98-1825 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v.

7 F.Supp.2d 96 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jerome E. ROYAL, Defendant. No. CR. 92-10297-REK. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 12, 1998. *97 Opinion KEETON, District Judge. The matter before the court is Defendant Jerome Royal's Motion for New Trial (Docket No. 230, filed Decemb

USCA1 Opinion November 25, 1996 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 95-2176 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v.

TORRUELLA, Chief Judge. Appellant Jerome Royal (“Royal”) makes several claims on appeal. Specifically, he challenges the denial of his motions relating to jury selection and jury instructions, the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction, and sentencing considerations. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse the denial of Royal’s motion to inspect the master j

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-3096 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff-Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court

*638 MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Royal Terrell Arrington appeals from his resentencing after remand. On the original appeal from his conviction and 77 month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, he attacked a sentencing enhancement applied by the district court. We held that it was unclear fro

FAGG, Circuit Judge. Royal Terrell Arrington appeals his conviction and sentence as a felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We affirm Arrington’s conviction, but vacate his sentence and remand to the district court. Arrington was arrested in Hennepin County, Minnesota after a high speed chase that ended when Arrington and his passeng

902 F.Supp. 268 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lloyd ROYAL, Defendant. Cr. No. 95-420 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 24, 1995. *269 Kenneth Whitted, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Reita Pendry, Federal Public Defender Service, Washington, DC, for de

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-204C (Filed July 26, 2022) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HAYWOOD ROYAL, * Motion for Judgement on the * Administrative Record; Plaintiff, * Instrumentality of War; Arbitrary * and

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-3444 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v.

971 F.2d 756 U.S.v.Royal NO. 91-7566 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. July 30, 1992 1 Appeal From: M.D.Ala. 2 AFFIRMED.

979 F.2d 213 U.S.v.Royal* NO. 91-8197 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Nov 03, 1992 1 Appeal From: M.D.Ga. 2

951 F.2d 368 U.S.v.Royal* NO. 90-8939 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Dec 11, 1991 1 Appeal From: S.D.Ga. 2

11 F.Supp.2d 1358 (1998) UNITED STATES of America v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD., a/k/a "Royal Caribbean International," Defendant. No. 98-0103-CR. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. May 12, 1998. *1359 *1360 *1361 Thomas Watts-Fitzgerald, Asst. U

8 F.Supp.2d 690 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ROYAL GEROPSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 4:97-CV-218. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. June 2, 1998. *691 Kent W. Penhallurick, Richard H. Blake, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Cleveland, OH, for United States of America, p

759 F.Supp. 1238 (1990) UNITED STATES of America v. Calvin ROYAL. No. 1:90-CR-119-3. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. December 28, 1990. Debra A. Carr, Asst. U.S. Atty., Beaumont, Tex., for plaintiff. Donald O. Pinkston, New Orleans, La., for defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER COBB, District Judge. The defen

Slip Op. 23- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ROYAL BRUSH MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Chief Judge Court No. 19-00198 Defendant, and DIXON TICONDEROGA CO., Defendant-Intervenor. OPINION [